Paper · 2023 · Water

Effects of Zeolite on Physiological Characteristics and Grain Quality in Rice under Alternate Wetting and Drying Irrigation

Yidi Sun; Jigan Xie; Huijing Hou; et al.

12
claims
29
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Background: Zeolite (Z) is gradually used in rice production due to its holding ability for water and nutrients, but limited information is available on how its physiological function affects rice grain yield and quality under water stress. Methods: This study aimed to investigate the effect of Z application on rice physiological characteristics, dry matter and nitrogen accumulation, grain yield and quality under continuous flooding (CF) and alternate wetting and drying irrigation (AWD). Results: The results showed that, compared with CF, AWD reduced leaf SPAD, root bleeding intensity, aboveground dry matter and nitrogen accumulation, resulted in lower grain yield without Z application, but improved root–shoot ratio and root N accumulation. Z application increased dry matter and N accumulation, and subsequent grain yield by improving leaf SPAD and root bleeding intensity. Both AWD and Z application improved water use efficiency. AWD reduced head rice rate, chalky rice rate and chalkiness, but improved the taste value by increasing the breakdown and reducing the setback. Z application improved protein content, reduced breakdown and setback, but increased chalky rice rate and chalkiness. Conclusions: These results indicated that AWD and Z application could achieve several benefits including improved grain yield, grain quality and water use efficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AWD reduced leaf SPAD and root bleeding intensity compared with CF.

Treatment
AWDe1
Outcome
leaf SPAD, root bleeding intensitye1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
CFe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“compared with CF, AWD reduced leaf SPAD, root bleeding intensity, aboveground dry matter and nitrogen accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–641 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Rice under”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AWD reduced aboveground dry matter and nitrogen accumulation compared with CF.

Treatment
AWDe1
Outcome
aboveground dry matter and nitrogen accumulatione1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
CFe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“compared with CF, AWD reduced leaf SPAD, root bleeding intensity, aboveground dry matter and nitrogen accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–641 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Rice under”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AWD resulted in lower grain yield without Z application.

Treatment
AWDe1
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
lowere2
Qualifier
without Z applicatione2
Comparator
CFe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“resulted in lower grain yield without Z application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–694 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with CF, AWD reduced leaf SPAD, root bleeding intensity, aboveground dry matter and nitrogen accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–641 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Rice under”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AWD improved root–shoot ratio and root N accumulation.

Treatment
AWDe1
Outcome
root–shoot ratio and root N accumulatione3
Direction
improvede3
Comparator
CFe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“improved root–shoot ratio and root N accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–749 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with CF, AWD reduced leaf SPAD, root bleeding intensity, aboveground dry matter and nitrogen accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–641 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Rice under”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Z application increased dry matter, N accumulation and subsequent grain yield by improving leaf SPAD and root bleeding intensity.

Treatment
Z applicatione4
Outcome
dry matter and N accumulation, and subsequent grain yielde4
Direction
increasede4
Qualifier
by improving leaf SPAD and root bleeding intensitye4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Z application increased dry matter and N accumulation, and subsequent grain yield by improving leaf SPAD and root bleeding intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–883 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Rice under”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AWD improved water use efficiency.

Treatment
AWDe5
Outcome
water use efficiencye5
Direction
improvede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Both AWD and Z application improved water use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–941 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Rice under”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Z application improved water use efficiency.

Treatment
Z applicatione5
Outcome
water use efficiencye5
Direction
improvede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Both AWD and Z application improved water use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–941 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Rice under”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AWD reduced head rice rate, chalky rice rate and chalkiness.

Treatment
AWDe6
Outcome
head rice rate, chalky rice rate and chalkinesse6
Direction
reducede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“AWD reduced head rice rate, chalky rice rate and chalkiness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1002 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Rice under”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AWD improved taste value by increasing breakdown and reducing setback.

Treatment
AWDe6
Outcome
taste valuee7
Direction
improvede7
Qualifier
by increasing the breakdown and reducing the setbacke7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“improved the taste value by increasing the breakdown and reducing the setback”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1085 · show in text ↑
e6

“AWD reduced head rice rate, chalky rice rate and chalkiness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1002 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Rice under”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Z application improved protein content.

Treatment
Z applicatione6
Outcome
protein contente6
Direction
improvede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Z application improved protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1125 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Rice under”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Z application reduced breakdown and setback.

Treatment
Z applicatione6
Outcome
breakdown and setbacke7
Direction
reducede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Z application improved protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1125 · show in text ↑
e7

“reduced breakdown and setback”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1156 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Rice under”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Z application increased chalky rice rate and chalkiness.

Treatment
Z applicatione6
Outcome
chalky rice rate and chalkinesse7
Direction
increasede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Z application improved protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1125 · show in text ↑
e7

“increased chalky rice rate and chalkiness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1203 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Rice under”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–83 · show in text ↑

processing · physiology: pigments · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

irrigation · quality: general · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 16 positive, 5 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

processing · quality: general · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 19 positive, 7 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

irrigation · physiology: pigments · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 21 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

processing · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 34 positive, 1 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

processing · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

88 papers: 56 positive, 32 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

84 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

processing · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

114 papers: 88 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 88 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

110 papers more in this group

See all 114 papers →

irrigation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 222 positive, 69 negative or no effect

221 papers in the same direction as this paper · 62 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

287 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.