Paper · 1991 · The Korean Journal of Crop Science

Effect of Period and Storehouse-Grade in Grain Storage and Degree of Milling on the Sensory Taste of Cooked Rice

Yong-Woong Kwon; Jeon-Woo Bang

7
claims
9
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The changes in fat acidity of brown rice and eating quality of rice during long term grain storage of unhulled rice were evaluated for the government managed rices. The Tongil type rice grains had consistently significantly lower fat acidity during three and half year storage than the Japonica type rice. On sensory evaluation of the fresh milled cooked rice the eating quality of the long term stored rices, 1987, 1988, and 1989 produce Tongil did not differ much each other even though increase in fat acidity by year of storage. The Japonica rices produced in 1989 and 1990 in different locations and stored there also did not differ much in eating quality. The grains stored in storehouses of super grade did not differ significantly from those stored in the first grades, but the grains stored (4 , RH 50%) grains have kept the eating quality almost same as the fresh grains even after two and half years. A higher degree of milling did not improve significantly the sensory taste of cooked rice of the grains long term stored.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tongil type rice had lower fat acidity than Japonica type rice during three and a half years of storage

Material
Tongil typee1
Treatment
three and half year storagee1
Outcome
fat aciditye1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
Japonica typee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The Tongil type rice grains had consistently significantly lower fat acidity during three and half year storage than the Japonica type rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–304 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eating quality of Tongil rice stored for 1987 to 1989 did not differ much between storage years

Material
Tongile2
Treatment
long term storede2
Outcome
eating qualitye2
Direction
did not differ muche2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“On sensory evaluation of the fresh milled cooked rice the eating quality of the long term stored rices, 1987, 1988, and 1989 produce Tongil did not differ much each other even though increase in fat acidity by year of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–531 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fat acidity increased with year of storage

Treatment
year of storagee2
Outcome
fat aciditye2
Direction
increasee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“On sensory evaluation of the fresh milled cooked rice the eating quality of the long term stored rices, 1987, 1988, and 1989 produce Tongil did not differ much each other even though increase in fat acidity by year of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–531 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Japonica rices produced in 1989 and 1990 and stored in different locations did not differ much in eating quality

Material
Japonica ricese3
Outcome
eating qualitye3
Direction
did not differ muche3
Setting
different locationse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The Japonica rices produced in 1989 and 1990 in different locations and stored there also did not differ much in eating quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–660 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grains stored in storehouses of super grade did not differ significantly in eating quality from grains stored in the first grades

Treatment
storehouses of super gradee4
Outcome
eating qualitye2
Direction
did not differ significantlye4
Comparator
first gradese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“On sensory evaluation of the fresh milled cooked rice the eating quality of the long term stored rices, 1987, 1988, and 1989 produce Tongil did not differ much each other even though increase in fat acidity by year of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–531 · show in text ↑
e4

“The grains stored in storehouses of super grade did not differ significantly from those stored in the first grades”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–776 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A higher degree of milling did not improve the sensory taste of stored cooked rice

Treatment
higher degree of millinge5
Outcome
sensory taste of cooked ricee5
Direction
did not improvee5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“A higher degree of milling did not improve significantly the sensory taste of cooked rice of the grains long term stored”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1032 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stored grains kept eating quality almost the same as fresh grains after two and a half years

Outcome
eating qualitye6
Direction
almost samee6
Qualifier
even after two and half yearse6
Comparator
fresh grainse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“On sensory evaluation of the fresh milled cooked rice the eating quality of the long term stored rices, 1987, 1988, and 1989 produce Tongil did not differ much each other even though increase in fat acidity by year of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–531 · show in text ↑
e6

“the grains stored (4 , RH 50%) grains have kept the eating quality almost same as the fresh grains even after two and half years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–910 · show in text ↑

processing · quality: general · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 19 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.