Abstract
This study was carried out in a private orchard located in Biala, Kafr El-Sheikh governorate, Egypt to investigate the effect of Nano-fertilizers versus chemical fertilizers on the growth and productivity of Valencia orange.Two rates of Nano-fertilizers (11.45 and 19.8 g/tree) were applied to the soil, foliar, or mixed, resulting in six treatments, with chemical fertilizers (0.55, 0.12, 0.46 Kg of N, P2O5, and K2O/tree/year, respectively) serving as the control.When compared to the control, Nano-fertilizer treatments increased tree canopy volume, leaf area, chlorophyll and nutrient contents, yield, and fruit quality.T7 (19.8 g/tree-half soil and half foliar application) produced consistent results in both seasons of the study, recording the highest canopy volume, leaf area, chlorophyll and nutrient content, yield, and fruit quality, which included vitamin C and TSS.Nano-foliar application was found to be more effective than soil application.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Nano-fertilizer treatments increased tree canopy volume and leaf area of Valencia orange compared with the chemical fertilizer control.
- Taxon
- Valencia orange
Citrus sinensise0 - Treatment
- Nano-fertilizer treatmentse1
- Outcome
- tree canopy volume, leaf areae1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Comparator
- controle1
- Setting
- Biala, Kafr El-Sheikh governorate, Egypte0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“This study was carried out in a private orchard located in Biala, Kafr El-Sheikh governorate, Egypt to investigate the effect of Nano-fertilizers versus chemical fertilizers on the growth and productivity of Valencia orange”
e1“When compared to the control, Nano-fertilizer treatments increased tree canopy volume, leaf area, chlorophyll and nutrient contents, yield, and fruit quality”
Claim · model-written summary
Nano-fertilizer treatments increased chlorophyll and nutrient contents of Valencia orange compared with the chemical fertilizer control.
- Taxon
- Valencia orangeCitrus sinensise0
- Treatment
- Nano-fertilizer treatmentse1
- Outcome
- chlorophyll and nutrient contentse1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Comparator
- controle1
- Setting
- Biala, Kafr El-Sheikh governorate, Egypte0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“This study was carried out in a private orchard located in Biala, Kafr El-Sheikh governorate, Egypt to investigate the effect of Nano-fertilizers versus chemical fertilizers on the growth and productivity of Valencia orange”
e1“When compared to the control, Nano-fertilizer treatments increased tree canopy volume, leaf area, chlorophyll and nutrient contents, yield, and fruit quality”
Claim · model-written summary
Nano-fertilizer treatments increased yield of Valencia orange compared with the chemical fertilizer control.
- Taxon
- Valencia orangeCitrus sinensise0
- Treatment
- Nano-fertilizer treatmentse1
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Comparator
- controle1
- Setting
- Biala, Kafr El-Sheikh governorate, Egypte0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“This study was carried out in a private orchard located in Biala, Kafr El-Sheikh governorate, Egypt to investigate the effect of Nano-fertilizers versus chemical fertilizers on the growth and productivity of Valencia orange”
e1“When compared to the control, Nano-fertilizer treatments increased tree canopy volume, leaf area, chlorophyll and nutrient contents, yield, and fruit quality”
Claim · model-written summary
Nano-fertilizer treatments increased fruit quality of Valencia orange compared with the chemical fertilizer control.
- Taxon
- Valencia orangeCitrus sinensise0
- Treatment
- Nano-fertilizer treatmentse1
- Outcome
- fruit qualitye1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Comparator
- controle1
- Setting
- Biala, Kafr El-Sheikh governorate, Egypte0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“This study was carried out in a private orchard located in Biala, Kafr El-Sheikh governorate, Egypt to investigate the effect of Nano-fertilizers versus chemical fertilizers on the growth and productivity of Valencia orange”
e1“When compared to the control, Nano-fertilizer treatments increased tree canopy volume, leaf area, chlorophyll and nutrient contents, yield, and fruit quality”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T7 (19.8 g/tree, half soil and half foliar) recorded the highest canopy volume, leaf area, chlorophyll and nutrient content of Valencia orange in both seasons.
- Taxon
- Valencia orangeCitrus sinensise0
- Treatment
- T7 (19.8 g/tree-half soil and half foliar application)e2
- Outcome
- canopy volume, leaf area, chlorophyll and nutrient contente2
- Direction
- higheste2
- Qualifier
- in both seasonse2
- Setting
- Biala, Kafr El-Sheikh governorate, Egypte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“This study was carried out in a private orchard located in Biala, Kafr El-Sheikh governorate, Egypt to investigate the effect of Nano-fertilizers versus chemical fertilizers on the growth and productivity of Valencia orange”
e2“T7 (19.8 g/tree-half soil and half foliar application) produced consistent results in both seasons of the study, recording the highest canopy volume, leaf area, chlorophyll and nutrient content, yield, and fruit quality, which included vitamin C and TSS”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T7 recorded the highest yield and fruit quality, including vitamin C and TSS, of Valencia orange.
- Taxon
- Valencia orangeCitrus sinensise0
- Treatment
- T7 (19.8 g/tree-half soil and half foliar application)e2
- Outcome
- yield, and fruit qualitye2
- Direction
- higheste2
- Qualifier
- vitamin C and TSSe2
- Setting
- Biala, Kafr El-Sheikh governorate, Egypte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“This study was carried out in a private orchard located in Biala, Kafr El-Sheikh governorate, Egypt to investigate the effect of Nano-fertilizers versus chemical fertilizers on the growth and productivity of Valencia orange”
e2“T7 (19.8 g/tree-half soil and half foliar application) produced consistent results in both seasons of the study, recording the highest canopy volume, leaf area, chlorophyll and nutrient content, yield, and fruit quality, which included vitamin C and TSS”
Claim · model-written summary
Nano-foliar application was more effective than soil application of nano-fertilizers on Valencia orange.
- Taxon
- Valencia orangeCitrus sinensise0
- Treatment
- Nano-foliar applicatione3
- Outcome
- effectivee3
- Direction
- moree3
- Comparator
- soil applicatione3
- Setting
- Biala, Kafr El-Sheikh governorate, Egypte0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“This study was carried out in a private orchard located in Biala, Kafr El-Sheikh governorate, Egypt to investigate the effect of Nano-fertilizers versus chemical fertilizers on the growth and productivity of Valencia orange”
e3“Nano-foliar application was found to be more effective than soil application”
The same questions in other papers
application · quality: grain · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →application · physiology: pigments · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →nanoparticle · physiology: pigments · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →nanoparticle · yield · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →nanoparticle · growth · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.