Paper · 2002 · Acta Horticulturae

FOLIAR TREATMENTS AS A STRATEGY TO CONTROL IRON CHLOROSIS IN ORANGE TREES

M. Pestana; P.J. Correia; M.G. Miguel; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
18
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Different foliar treatments were applied to evaluate the recovery of iron chlorosis of orange trees (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osb. cv. 'Valencia late') grown on a calcareous soil. The treatments were: Fe (II) sulphate (500 mg Fe L-1), sulphuric acid (0.5 mM H2SO4), Fe (III)-chelate (Hampiron 654 GS, 120 mg Fe L-1) and distilled water as a control. The recovery from iron chlorosis was evaluated with the SPAD-502 apparatus and the values converted to total chlorophyll concentration. The effects of treatments on the mineral composition of leaves and flowers, and the size and quality of fruits were evaluated. The residual effect of treatments was also evaluated one year later. In orange trees, the use of frequent foliar sprays with Fe was able to alleviate Fe chlorosis and prevented yield and quality losses caused by Fe chlorosis. Compared with the control, sprays of Fe (II) sulphate led to higher concentrations of chlorophyll, Fe and Zn in leaves and flowers at the end of the experimental period, and significantly improved fruit size and quality. Leaf Fe concentration increased after the sulphuric acid spray, but this treatment did not affect fruit quality parameters. The mineral composition of flowers and leaves was correlated with some fruit quality parameters obtained one year later. These results suggest that foliar sprays with Fe could help to avoid fruit quality losses caused by Fe chlorosis in citrus orchards.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Frequent foliar iron sprays alleviated chlorosis in orange trees.

Taxon
orange treese0
Treatment
frequent foliar sprays with Fee0
Outcome
Fe chlorosise0
Direction
alleviatee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In orange trees, the use of frequent foliar sprays with Fe was able to alleviate Fe chlorosis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–771 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Frequent foliar iron sprays prevented yield and quality losses.

Taxon
orange treese0
Treatment
frequent foliar sprays with Fee0
Outcome
yield and quality lossese0
Direction
preventede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In orange trees, the use of frequent foliar sprays with Fe was able to alleviate Fe chlorosis and prevented yield and quality losses caused by Fe chlorosis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–833 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe(II) sulphate sprays increased leaf and flower chlorophyll, Fe and Zn concentrations versus control.

Taxon
ORANGE TREESt0
Organ / stage
leaves and flowerse0
Treatment
sprays of Fe (II) sulphatee0
Outcome
concentrations of chlorophyll, Fe and Zn in leaves and flowerse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the control, sprays of Fe (II) sulphate led to higher concentrations of chlorophyll, Fe and Zn in leaves and flowers at the end of the experimental period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–1003 · show in text ↑
t0

“ORANGE TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe(II) sulphate sprays significantly improved orange fruit size and quality.

Taxon
ORANGE TREESt0
Organ / stage
fruite0
Treatment
sprays of Fe (II) sulphatee0
Outcome
fruit size and qualitye0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
the controle1

Verbatim

e0

“sprays of Fe (II) sulphate led to higher concentrations of chlorophyll, Fe and Zn in leaves and flowers at the end of the experimental period, and significantly improved fruit size and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–1054 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–860 · show in text ↑
t0

“ORANGE TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphuric acid spray increased leaf Fe concentration.

Taxon
ORANGE TREESt0
Organ / stage
Leafe0
Treatment
sulphuric acid spraye0
Outcome
Leaf Fe concentratione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf Fe concentration increased after the sulphuric acid spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1118 · show in text ↑
t0

“ORANGE TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphuric acid spray did not affect fruit quality parameters.

Taxon
ORANGE TREESt0
Treatment
sulphuric acid spraye1
Outcome
fruit quality parameterse0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“this treatment did not affect fruit quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1178 · show in text ↑
e1

“sulphuric acid spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1118 · show in text ↑
t0

“ORANGE TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–73 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flower and leaf mineral composition correlated with fruit quality one year later.

Taxon
ORANGE TREESt0
Organ / stage
flowers and leavese0
Outcome
fruit quality parameterse0
Qualifier
one year latere0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The mineral composition of flowers and leaves was correlated with some fruit quality parameters obtained one year later”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1299 · show in text ↑
t0

“ORANGE TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–73 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest foliar Fe sprays could help avoid fruit quality losses in citrus orchards.

Taxon
citrusCitruse0
Treatment
foliar sprays with Fee0
Outcome
avoid fruit quality lossese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar sprays with Fe could help to avoid fruit quality losses caused by Fe chlorosis in citrus orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1328–1432 · show in text ↑

iron atom · physiology: pigments · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

sulfate · quality: general · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

iron atom · quality: general · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

sulfate · physiology: pigments · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · quality: general · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

application · quality: grain · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 10 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 22 positive, 4 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.