Paper · 2023 · Seed Science and Technology

Dormancy Behaviour and Effectiveness of Dormancy Breaking Methods in Cucumber Seeds (Cucumis Sativus)

Nasrul Haq; Satriyas Ilyas; M. Rahmad Suhartanto; et al.

6
claims
16
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the dormancy behaviour and effectiveness of various dormancy breaking treatments on cucumber seeds. Freshly harvested cucumber seeds of varieties CU-1047 and CU-1051 were extracted, dried and stored for eight weeks at ambient temperature. The stored seed lots were tested for seed germination once a week and hormone analysis (ABA, GA, zeatin and kinetin) every two weeks. In a second experiment, dormancy breaking methods using dry heat treatment (DHT) at 36, 50 or 80°C for various lengths of time. Chemical treatments were also tested, with a 24-hour soaking time using GA 3 , KNO 3 or ultra-fine bubble (UFB) water. The results showed that the dormancy persistence in both varieties was three weeks after the seeds were harvested, by which time germination reached more than 85%. The decrease in ABA content during the storage period correlated with an increase in seed germination. The most effective methods of breaking dormancy were dry heat at 80°C for 24 hours (highest germination: 62%) and a DHT chamber (59%) compared with control (1%). An alternative method was soaking the seeds in 1% KNO 3 followed by drying to the initial moisture content (55% germination). UFB water was not effective in breaking the dormancy of cucumber seeds.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dormancy persisted three weeks in both cucumber varieties, when germination exceeded 85%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
dormancy persistencee0
Value
three weekse0
Qualifier
germination reached more than 85%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dormancy persistence in both varieties was three weeks after the seeds were harvested, by which time germination reached more than 85%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–810 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber Seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–83 · show in text ↑
t1

“Cucumber Seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–83 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Declining ABA during storage correlated with rising seed germination.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Compound
ABAe0
Outcome
seed germinatione0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
during the storage periode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The decrease in ABA content during the storage period correlated with an increase in seed germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–913 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber Seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–83 · show in text ↑
t1

“Cucumber Seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry heat at 80°C for 24 hours gave 62% germination versus 1% control.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
dry heat at 80°C for 24 hourse0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
higheste0
Value
62%e0
Qualifier
1%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dry heat at 80°C for 24 hours (highest germination: 62%) and a DHT chamber (59%) compared with control (1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1075 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber Seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–83 · show in text ↑
t1

“Cucumber Seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DHT chamber treatment gave 59% germination versus 1% control.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
DHT chambere0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
higheste0
Value
59%e0
Qualifier
1%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dry heat at 80°C for 24 hours (highest germination: 62%) and a DHT chamber (59%) compared with control (1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1075 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber Seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–83 · show in text ↑
t1

“Cucumber Seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soaking in 1% KNO 3 then drying gave 55% germination.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
soaking the seeds in 1% KNO 3 followed by drying to the initial moisture contente0
Outcome
germinatione0
Value
55%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soaking the seeds in 1% KNO 3 followed by drying to the initial moisture content (55% germination)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1201 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber Seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–83 · show in text ↑
t1

“Cucumber Seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UFB water did not effectively break cucumber seed dormancy.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
UFB watere0
Outcome
breaking the dormancy of cucumber seedse0
Direction
not effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UFB water was not effective in breaking the dormancy of cucumber seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1273 · show in text ↑

heat · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results differ

25 papers: 16 positive, 9 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

soil water · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

processing · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 20 positive, 8 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

application · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

73 papers: 66 positive, 7 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.