Paper · 2016 · Proceedings of the Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences

THE EFFECT OF COOLING RATE ON CUCUMBER PLANT RESPONSE TO A DAILY SHORT-TERM TEMPERATURE DROP

Татьяна Геннадиевна Шибаева; Елена Георгиевна Шерудило; Александр Федорович Титов; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

We studied the effect of cooling rate on responses of cucumber plants (Cucumis sativus L.) to a daily short-term (2 hour) temperature reduction (DROP) at the end of the night (dark DROP) or at the beginning of the day (light DROP). The temperature was lowered from 20° to 9 °C gradually (at a rate of 0.4 °C/min) or sharply (11 °C/min) by transferring plants from one climate chamber to another. This work has shown that under short-term exposure to low non-injurious temperatures a fast versus slow cooling have somewhat different effects on plants. DROP with rapid cooling had a more pronounced negative impact on the state of the photosynthetic apparatus of the plants and biomass accumulation compared to DROP with slow temperature decrease. The differences were more pronounced when plants were treated by light DROP, which indicates that the time of day, or rather the presence or absence of light at a time when the plants are exposed to low temperature plays a significant role. At the same time, a plant height, leaf emergence rate and leaf chilling tolerance changed under the influence of DROP regardless of the cooling rate. All these factors should be considered in laboratory experiments, when low temperature effects on plants are studied at rapid cooling, when temperature changes are achieved by transferring plants from one growth chamber to another.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rapid cooling had a more negative impact on cucumber photosynthetic apparatus than slow cooling.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
DROP with rapid coolinge0
Outcome
state of the photosynthetic apparatuse0
Direction
more pronounced negative impacte0
Comparator
DROP with slow temperature decreasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DROP with rapid cooling had a more pronounced negative impact on the state of the photosynthetic apparatus of the plants and biomass accumulation compared to DROP with slow temperature decrease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–744 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCUMBER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rapid cooling more negatively affected cucumber biomass accumulation than slow cooling.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
DROP with rapid coolinge0
Outcome
biomass accumulatione0
Direction
more pronounced negative impacte0
Comparator
DROP with slow temperature decreasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DROP with rapid cooling had a more pronounced negative impact on the state of the photosynthetic apparatus of the plants and biomass accumulation compared to DROP with slow temperature decrease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–744 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCUMBER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cooling-rate differences were more pronounced under light DROP.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
light DROPe0
Outcome
differencese0
Direction
more pronouncede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The differences were more pronounced when plants were treated by light DROP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–821 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCUMBER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DROP changed cucumber height regardless of cooling rate.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
DROPe0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
changede0
Qualifier
regardless of the cooling ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a plant height, leaf emergence rate and leaf chilling tolerance changed under the influence of DROP regardless of the cooling rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1135 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCUMBER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DROP changed cucumber leaf emergence rate regardless of cooling rate.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
DROPe0
Outcome
leaf emergence ratee0
Direction
changede0
Qualifier
regardless of the cooling ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a plant height, leaf emergence rate and leaf chilling tolerance changed under the influence of DROP regardless of the cooling rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1135 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCUMBER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DROP changed cucumber leaf chilling tolerance regardless of cooling rate.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
DROPe0
Outcome
leaf chilling tolerancee0
Direction
changede0
Qualifier
regardless of the cooling ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a plant height, leaf emergence rate and leaf chilling tolerance changed under the influence of DROP regardless of the cooling rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1135 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCUMBER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑

processing · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 20 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

processing · physiology: photosynthesis · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.