Paper · 2023 · BioMetals

Changes in morphological traits, anatomical and molecular alterations caused by gamma-rays and zinc oxide nanoparticles in spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) plant

Amina A. Aly; Gehan Safwat; Noha E. Eliwa; et al.

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
14
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Spinach seeds were irradiated with gamma-rays after that soaked in zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs) at 0.0, 50, 100 and 200 ppm for twenty-four hours at room temperature. Vegetative plant growth, photosynthetic pigments, and proline contents were investigated. Also, anatomical studies and the polymorphism by the SCoT technique were conducted. The present results revealed that the germination percentage was at the maximum values for the treatment of 100 ppm ZnO-NPs (92%), followed by 100 ppm ZnO-NPs + 60 Gy (90%). The application of ZnO-NPs resulted in an enhancement in the plant length. The maximum of chlorophylls and carotenoids content was recorded in the treatment, 100 ppm ZnO-NPs + 60 Gy. Meanwhile, the irradiation dose level (60 Gy) with all ZnO-NPs treatments increased proline content and reached its maximum increase to 1.069 mg/g FW for the treatment 60 Gy combined with 200 ppm ZnO-NPs. Also, the anatomical studies declared that there were variations between the treatments; un-irradiated and irradiated combined with ZnO-NPs plants which reveal that the leave epidermal tissue increased with 200 ppm ZnO-NPs in both the upper and lower epidermis. While irradiated plants with 60 Gy combined with 100 ppm ZnO-NPs gave more thickness of upper epidermis. As well as SCoT molecular marker technique effectively induced molecular alterations between the treatments. Where, SCoT primers targeted many new and missing amplicons that are expected to be associated with the lowly and highly expressed genes with 18.2 and 81.8%, respectively. Also, showed that the soaking in ZnO-NPs was helped for reducing molecular alteration rate, both spontaneous and induced by gamma irradiation. This nominates ZnO-NPs as potential nano-protective agents that can reduce irradiation-induced genetic damage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinach germination percentage was highest (92%) with 100 ppm ZnO-NPs.

Treatment
100 ppm ZnO-NPse1
Outcome
germination percentagee1
Direction
maximum valuese1
Value
92%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–153 · show in text ↑
e1

“the germination percentage was at the maximum values for the treatment of 100 ppm ZnO-NPs (92%), followed by 100 ppm ZnO-NPs + 60 Gy (90%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–519 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinach germination percentage with 100 ppm ZnO-NPs plus 60 Gy was 90%, followed by the ZnO-NPs treatment.

Treatment
100 ppm ZnO-NPs + 60 Gye1
Outcome
germination percentagee1
Direction
followed bye1
Value
90%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–153 · show in text ↑
e1

“the germination percentage was at the maximum values for the treatment of 100 ppm ZnO-NPs (92%), followed by 100 ppm ZnO-NPs + 60 Gy (90%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–519 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnO-NPs enhanced spinach plant length.

Treatment
ZnO-NPse2
Outcome
plant lengthe2
Direction
enhancemente2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–153 · show in text ↑
e2

“The application of ZnO-NPs resulted in an enhancement in the plant length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–594 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined 100 ppm ZnO-NPs plus 60 Gy treatment gave the maximum chlorophyll and carotenoid content in spinach.

Treatment
100 ppm ZnO-NPs + 60 Gye3
Outcome
chlorophylls and carotenoids contente3
Direction
maximume3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–153 · show in text ↑
e3

“The maximum of chlorophylls and carotenoids content was recorded in the treatment, 100 ppm ZnO-NPs + 60 Gy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–702 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

60 Gy irradiation with all ZnO-NPs treatments increased spinach proline content.

Treatment
60 Gye4
Outcome
proline contente4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–153 · show in text ↑
e4

“the irradiation dose level (60 Gy) with all ZnO-NPs treatments increased proline content and reached its maximum increase to 1.069 mg/g FW for the treatment 60 Gy combined with 200 ppm ZnO-NPs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–907 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 60 Gy plus 200 ppm ZnO-NPs treatment gave the maximum proline increase in spinach, to 1.069 mg/g FW.

Treatment
60 Gy combined with 200 ppm ZnO-NPse4
Outcome
proline contente4
Direction
maximum increasee4
Value
1.069 mg/g FWe4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–153 · show in text ↑
e4

“the irradiation dose level (60 Gy) with all ZnO-NPs treatments increased proline content and reached its maximum increase to 1.069 mg/g FW for the treatment 60 Gy combined with 200 ppm ZnO-NPs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–907 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

200 ppm ZnO-NPs increased leaf epidermal tissue in both the upper and lower epidermis of spinach.

Organ / stage
leavee5
Treatment
200 ppm ZnO-NPse5
Outcome
epidermal tissuee5
Direction
increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–153 · show in text ↑
e5

“the leave epidermal tissue increased with 200 ppm ZnO-NPs in both the upper and lower epidermis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1169 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

60 Gy plus 100 ppm ZnO-NPs gave more thickness of the upper epidermis in spinach.

Organ / stage
upper epidermise6
Treatment
60 Gy combined with 100 ppm ZnO-NPse6
Outcome
thickness of upper epidermise6
Direction
moree6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–153 · show in text ↑
e6

“While irradiated plants with 60 Gy combined with 100 ppm ZnO-NPs gave more thickness of upper epidermis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1274 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SCoT primers targeted new and missing amplicons associated with lowly and highly expressed genes, at 18.2 and 81.8%.

Outcome
new and missing ampliconse7
Value
18.2 and 81.8%e7
Qualifier
associated with the lowly and highly expressed genese7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–153 · show in text ↑
e7

“SCoT primers targeted many new and missing amplicons that are expected to be associated with the lowly and highly expressed genes with 18.2 and 81.8%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1555 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The SCoT marker technique effectively induced molecular alterations between the treatments.

Outcome
molecular alterationse7
Comparator
between the treatmentse7

Verbatim

e7

“SCoT molecular marker technique effectively induced molecular alterations between the treatments. Where, SCoT primers targeted many new and missing amplicons that are expected to be associated with the lowly and highly expressed genes with 18.2 and 81.8%, respectively. Also, showed that the soaking in ZnO-NPs was helped for reducing molecular alteration rate, both spontaneous and induced by gamma irradiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1698 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soaking in ZnO-NPs reduced the molecular alteration rate in spinach, both spontaneous and gamma-induced.

Treatment
soaking in ZnO-NPse7
Outcome
molecular alteration ratee7
Direction
reducinge7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–153 · show in text ↑
e7

“SCoT molecular marker technique effectively induced molecular alterations between the treatments. Where, SCoT primers targeted many new and missing amplicons that are expected to be associated with the lowly and highly expressed genes with 18.2 and 81.8%, respectively. Also, showed that the soaking in ZnO-NPs was helped for reducing molecular alteration rate, both spontaneous and induced by gamma irradiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1698 · show in text ↑

zinc oxide · growth · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.