Paper · 2023 · Agronomy

Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) Interruption Cultivation Evidently Decreases the Anthracnose in the Succeeding Crop Chilli (Capsicum annuum L.)

Feihu Liu; Xuan Li; Huaran Hu; et al.

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Continuous cropping increases disease severity and causes arrested development of chilli plants and the decrease of yield and quality. Hemp-chilli rotation cropping evidently eased chilli diseases, but the causation remains unknown. This paper investigated the disease index (DI) of chilli’s anthracnose for hemp-chilli and continuous chilli cropping, the antifungal effect of water extract of hemp and chilli residues, and bacteria antagonistic to chilli anthracnose fungus from hemp and chilli rhizosphere. Hemp grown as a preceding crop decreased anthracnose DI from 35–39% for the continuous chilli to 14–15% for hemp-chilli rotation. Hemp residue water extract executed suppression of chilli anthracnose fungus and the efficiency increased as the extract concentration increased from 1% to 5%. Hemp extract concentration 5% gave a mean inhibition ratio (IR) of 32.34% to spore germination and IR 53.72% to mycelia growth, which was much greater than that of the chilli extract. Antagonistic bacteria isolated from the hemp rhizosphere evidently depressed the mycelia growth of the fungus with a mean IR 32.35%, while no antagonistic bacteria were obtained from the chilli rhizosphere. The stronger allelopathy of preceding hemp plants and antagonistic bacteria from the hemp rhizosphere synergistically suppressed the fungus growth and eased the disease in the succeeding chilli crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hemp as the preceding crop reduced chilli anthracnose disease index from 35–39% to 14–15%.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
Hemp grown as a preceding crope0
Outcome
anthracnose DIe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
14–15%e0
Qualifier
35–39%e0
Comparator
continuous chillie0

Verbatim

e0

“Hemp grown as a preceding crop decreased anthracnose DI from 35–39% for the continuous chilli to 14–15% for hemp-chilli rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–637 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hemp residue water extract suppressed the chilli anthracnose fungus, with greater inhibition at higher extract concentration.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
Hemp residue water extracte0
Outcome
chilli anthracnose funguse0
Direction
suppressione0
Qualifier
from 1% to 5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Hemp residue water extract executed suppression of chilli anthracnose fungus and the efficiency increased as the extract concentration increased from 1% to 5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–797 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 5%, hemp extract inhibited spore germination by 32.34%.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
Hemp extract concentration 5%e0
Outcome
spore germinatione0
Direction
inhibitione0
Value
32.34%e0
Comparator
chilli extracte0

Verbatim

e0

“Hemp extract concentration 5% gave a mean inhibition ratio (IR) of 32.34% to spore germination and IR 53.72% to mycelia growth, which was much greater than that of the chilli extract”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–981 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 5%, hemp extract inhibited mycelial growth by 53.72%.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
Hemp extract concentration 5%e0
Outcome
mycelia growthe0
Direction
inhibitione0
Value
53.72%e0
Comparator
chilli extracte0

Verbatim

e0

“Hemp extract concentration 5% gave a mean inhibition ratio (IR) of 32.34% to spore germination and IR 53.72% to mycelia growth, which was much greater than that of the chilli extract”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–981 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacteria from the hemp rhizosphere inhibited fungal mycelial growth by a mean 32.35%.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
Antagonistic bacteria isolated from the hemp rhizospheree0
Interactor
funguse0pathogen
Second interactor
Antagonistic bacteriae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
mycelia growth of the funguse0
Direction
depressede0
Value
32.35%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Antagonistic bacteria isolated from the hemp rhizosphere evidently depressed the mycelia growth of the fungus with a mean IR 32.35%, while no antagonistic bacteria were obtained from the chilli rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1188 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No antagonistic bacteria were obtained from the chilli rhizosphere.

Taxon
chillie0
Outcome
no antagonistic bacteria were obtainede0

Verbatim

e0

“no antagonistic bacteria were obtained from the chilli rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1188 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute reduced chilli disease to stronger hemp allelopathy and antagonistic hemp-rhizosphere bacteria acting together.

Taxon
chillie0
Interactor
funguse0pathogen
Second interactor
antagonistic bacteriae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
eased the disease in the succeeding chilli crope0
Qualifier
stronger allelopathy of preceding hemp plants and antagonistic bacteria from the hemp rhizospheree0

Verbatim

e0

“The stronger allelopathy of preceding hemp plants and antagonistic bacteria from the hemp rhizosphere synergistically suppressed the fungus growth and eased the disease in the succeeding chilli crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1388 · show in text ↑

botanical · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 23 positive, 7 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

inoculation · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

56 papers: 48 positive, 8 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

botanical · disease · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

24 papers: 24 positive, 0 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.