Paper · 2023 · Applied Microbiology

Impacts of Tillage Practices on Growth, Phosphorus Uptake, and Yield of Maize in Controlled and Field-Based Studies in Relation to Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi

Yuya Tatewaki; Masao Higo; Katsunori Isobe

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) on the growth, phosphorus (P) uptake, and yield of maize in the presence or absence of tillage. The two-year field experiment was conducted in Kanagawa, Japan. Firstly, we investigated whether the presence of indigenous AMF communities in the roots, as determined by amplicon sequencing analysis, contributed to maize growth in Experiment 1, a 2-year field-based study. The findings revealed that the maize (Zea mays L.) in rotary tillage had higher P uptake, growth at the six-leaves collar stage, and yield, compared to no tillage. The AMF communities colonizing maize roots were altered by the presence or absence of tillage; specifically, tillage increased the dominance of the Gigasporaceae, whereas no tillage increased the dominance of the Acaulosporaceae. Based on these findings, we confirmed whether the inoculation of similar AMF strains, as analyzed in the field study of tillage practices on maize roots, produces growth-promoting effects for maize growth in a controlled pot experiment consistent with the results of the field experiment. For experiment 2, Dentiscutata cerradensis TK-1, Cetraspora pellucida SZ-3 (Gigasporaceae), Acaulospora morrowiae AP-5, and A. longula F-1 (Acaulosporaceae) were inoculated as AMF inocula for a pot experiment. The results showed that aboveground biomass did not change with any inoculum compared to the control. The P concentration in maize was higher for D. cerradensis TK-1 and C. pellucida SZ-3 inoculation than for the control. However, inoculation with A. morrowiae AP-5 and A. longula F-1 did not change P concentrations from the control. This indicates that D. cerradensis TK-1 and C. pellucida SZ-3 are more effective in promoting P uptake in maize than in A morrowiae AP-5 and A. longula F-1. Based on field and pot experiments, our findings suggest that tillage practices lead to alterations in the AMF communities that colonize the roots, and this shift may also contribute to changes in P uptake and crop growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotary tillage increased maize P uptake compared with no tillage.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
rotary tillagee1
Outcome
P uptakee1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
no tillagee1
Setting
Kanagawa, Japane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The two-year field experiment was conducted in Kanagawa, Japan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–232 · show in text ↑
e1

“the maize (Zea mays L.) in rotary tillage had higher P uptake, growth at the six-leaves collar stage, and yield, compared to no tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–606 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotary tillage increased maize growth at the six-leaves collar stage and yield compared with no tillage.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
rotary tillagee1
Outcome
growth at the six-leaves collar stage, and yielde1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
no tillagee1
Setting
Kanagawa, Japane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The two-year field experiment was conducted in Kanagawa, Japan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–232 · show in text ↑
e1

“the maize (Zea mays L.) in rotary tillage had higher P uptake, growth at the six-leaves collar stage, and yield, compared to no tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–606 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage increased the dominance of Gigasporaceae AMF on maize roots.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Organ / stage
rootse2
Treatment
tillagee2
Interactor
AMFe2symbiont
Outcome
dominance of the Gigasporaceaee2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
no tillagee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the maize (Zea mays L.) in rotary tillage had higher P uptake, growth at the six-leaves collar stage, and yield, compared to no tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–606 · show in text ↑
e2

“The AMF communities colonizing maize roots were altered by the presence or absence of tillage; specifically, tillage increased the dominance of the Gigasporaceae, whereas no tillage increased the dominance of the Acaulosporaceae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–836 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage increased the dominance of Acaulosporaceae AMF on maize roots.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Organ / stage
rootse2
Treatment
no tillagee2
Interactor
AMFe2symbiont
Outcome
dominance of the Acaulosporaceaee2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
tillagee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the maize (Zea mays L.) in rotary tillage had higher P uptake, growth at the six-leaves collar stage, and yield, compared to no tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–606 · show in text ↑
e2

“The AMF communities colonizing maize roots were altered by the presence or absence of tillage; specifically, tillage increased the dominance of the Gigasporaceae, whereas no tillage increased the dominance of the Acaulosporaceae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–836 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with AMF did not change aboveground biomass of maize in pots.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse5
Treatment
any inoculume3
Outcome
aboveground biomasse3
Direction
did not changee3
Comparator
the controle3
Setting
controlled pot experimente5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The results showed that aboveground biomass did not change with any inoculum compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1337–1437 · show in text ↑
e5

“produces growth-promoting effects for maize growth in a controlled pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1073 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with D. cerradensis TK-1 increased maize P concentration compared with the control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse4
Treatment
D. cerradensis TK-1e4
Interactor
D. cerradensis TK-1Dentiscutata cerradensise4symbiont
Outcome
P concentratione4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
the controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The P concentration in maize was higher for D. cerradensis TK-1 and C. pellucida SZ-3 inoculation than for the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1439–1557 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with C. pellucida SZ-3 increased maize P concentration compared with the control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse4
Treatment
C. pellucida SZ-3e4
Interactor
C. pellucida SZ-3Cetraspora pellucidae4symbiont
Outcome
P concentratione4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
the controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The P concentration in maize was higher for D. cerradensis TK-1 and C. pellucida SZ-3 inoculation than for the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1439–1557 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with A. morrowiae AP-5 did not change maize P concentration from the control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse4
Treatment
A. morrowiae AP-5e6
Interactor
A. morrowiae AP-5Acaulospora morrowiaee6symbiont
Outcome
P concentrationse6
Direction
did not changee6
Comparator
the controle6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The P concentration in maize was higher for D. cerradensis TK-1 and C. pellucida SZ-3 inoculation than for the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1439–1557 · show in text ↑
e6

“However, inoculation with A. morrowiae AP-5 and A. longula F-1 did not change P concentrations from the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1559–1670 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with A. longula F-1 did not change maize P concentration from the control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse4
Treatment
A. longula F-1e6
Interactor
A. longula F-1Acaulospora longulae6symbiont
Outcome
P concentrationse6
Direction
did not changee6
Comparator
the controle6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The P concentration in maize was higher for D. cerradensis TK-1 and C. pellucida SZ-3 inoculation than for the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1439–1557 · show in text ↑
e6

“However, inoculation with A. morrowiae AP-5 and A. longula F-1 did not change P concentrations from the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1559–1670 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage-driven shifts in AMF communities may contribute to changes in maize P uptake and crop growth.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
tillage practicese7
Outcome
P uptake and crop growthe7
Qualifier
alterations in the AMF communities that colonize the rootse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the maize (Zea mays L.) in rotary tillage had higher P uptake, growth at the six-leaves collar stage, and yield, compared to no tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–606 · show in text ↑
e7

“tillage practices lead to alterations in the AMF communities that colonize the roots, and this shift may also contribute to changes in P uptake and crop growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1891–2050 · show in text ↑

tillage · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

127 papers: 93 positive, 34 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

123 papers more in this group

See all 127 papers →

inoculation · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

699 papers: 635 positive, 64 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 635 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

695 papers more in this group

See all 699 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.