Abstract
The current study was carried out at Central Research Farm, SHUATS, Naini, Prayagraj, U.P during kharif season of 2021. Two applications of seven insecticides were used against Eariasvittellaand the resultsrevealed that Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC had the lowest percent of shoot and fruit infestation with 11.71% and 11.96% followed by Emamectin benzoate 5% SG (12.96% and 14.11%), Spinetoram 11.7% SC (13.28% and 14.70%), Imidacloprid 17.8% SL (14.71% and 16.35%), Flonicamid 50 WG (14.90% and 17.31%), Acephate 75 SP (15.74% and 17.65%) and Diafenthiuron 50 WP (16.39% and 19.61%) respectively as compared to control (water spray) with 20.75% and 24.75%. Benefit cost ratio was found highest in Chlorantraniliprole (1: 4.4) followed by Imidacloprid (1: 4.2), Emamectin benzoate (1: 4.2), Spinetoram (1: 3.4), Diafenthiuron (1: 3.3), Flonicamid (1: 3.3), Acephate (1: 3.1) and Control (1: 1.6).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC gave the lowest shoot and fruit infestation (11.71% and 11.96%), lower than the water-spray control (20.75% and 24.75%).
- Taxon
- Okra
.jpg?width=60)
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SCe0
- Interactor
- Earias Vittella
_Figure_26b.jpg?width=60)
Earias vittellat0pest - Outcome
- shoot and fruit infestatione0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 11.71% and 11.96%e0
- Comparator
- control (water spray)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
_Figure_26b.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Efficacy and Economics of Some Selected Insecticides Against Shoot and Fruit Borer (Earias Vittella) of Okra”
e0“Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC had the lowest percent of shoot and fruit infestation with 11.71% and 11.96%”
e1“as compared to control (water spray) with 20.75% and 24.75%”
Claim · model-written summary
Emamectin benzoate 5% SG gave shoot and fruit infestation of 12.96% and 14.11%.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Emamectin benzoate 5% SGe3
- Interactor
- Earias VittellaEarias vittellat0pest
- Outcome
- shoot and fruit infestatione0
- Value
- 12.96% and 14.11%e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Efficacy and Economics of Some Selected Insecticides Against Shoot and Fruit Borer (Earias Vittella) of Okra”
e0“Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC had the lowest percent of shoot and fruit infestation with 11.71% and 11.96%”
e3“Emamectin benzoate 5% SG (12.96% and 14.11%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Spinetoram 11.7% SC gave shoot and fruit infestation of 13.28% and 14.70%.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Spinetoram 11.7% SCe3
- Interactor
- Earias VittellaEarias vittellat0pest
- Outcome
- shoot and fruit infestatione0
- Value
- 13.28% and 14.70%e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Efficacy and Economics of Some Selected Insecticides Against Shoot and Fruit Borer (Earias Vittella) of Okra”
e0“Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC had the lowest percent of shoot and fruit infestation with 11.71% and 11.96%”
e3“Spinetoram 11.7% SC (13.28% and 14.70%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid 17.8% SL gave shoot and fruit infestation of 14.71% and 16.35%.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Imidacloprid 17.8% SLe3
- Interactor
- Earias VittellaEarias vittellat0pest
- Outcome
- shoot and fruit infestatione0
- Value
- 14.71% and 16.35%e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Efficacy and Economics of Some Selected Insecticides Against Shoot and Fruit Borer (Earias Vittella) of Okra”
e0“Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC had the lowest percent of shoot and fruit infestation with 11.71% and 11.96%”
e3“Imidacloprid 17.8% SL (14.71% and 16.35%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Flonicamid 50 WG gave shoot and fruit infestation of 14.90% and 17.31%.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Flonicamid 50 WGe3
- Interactor
- Earias VittellaEarias vittellat0pest
- Outcome
- shoot and fruit infestatione0
- Value
- 14.90% and 17.31%e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Efficacy and Economics of Some Selected Insecticides Against Shoot and Fruit Borer (Earias Vittella) of Okra”
e0“Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC had the lowest percent of shoot and fruit infestation with 11.71% and 11.96%”
e3“Flonicamid 50 WG (14.90% and 17.31%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Acephate 75 SP gave shoot and fruit infestation of 15.74% and 17.65%.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Acephate 75 SPe3
- Interactor
- Earias VittellaEarias vittellat0pest
- Outcome
- shoot and fruit infestatione0
- Value
- 15.74% and 17.65%e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Efficacy and Economics of Some Selected Insecticides Against Shoot and Fruit Borer (Earias Vittella) of Okra”
e0“Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC had the lowest percent of shoot and fruit infestation with 11.71% and 11.96%”
e3“Acephate 75 SP (15.74% and 17.65%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Diafenthiuron 50 WP gave shoot and fruit infestation of 16.39% and 19.61%.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Diafenthiuron 50 WPe3
- Interactor
- Earias VittellaEarias vittellat0pest
- Outcome
- shoot and fruit infestatione0
- Value
- 16.39% and 19.61%e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Efficacy and Economics of Some Selected Insecticides Against Shoot and Fruit Borer (Earias Vittella) of Okra”
e0“Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC had the lowest percent of shoot and fruit infestation with 11.71% and 11.96%”
e3“Diafenthiuron 50 WP (16.39% and 19.61%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Benefit cost ratio was highest for chlorantraniliprole (1: 4.4).
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Chlorantraniliprolee2
- Outcome
- Benefit cost ratioe2
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 1: 4.4e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Efficacy and Economics of Some Selected Insecticides Against Shoot and Fruit Borer (Earias Vittella) of Okra”
e2“Benefit cost ratio was found highest in Chlorantraniliprole (1: 4.4) followed by Imidacloprid (1: 4.2), Emamectin benzoate (1: 4.2), Spinetoram (1: 3.4), Diafenthiuron (1: 3.3), Flonicamid (1: 3.3), Acephate (1: 3.1) and Control (1: 1.6)”
Claim · model-written summary
Benefit cost ratio for imidacloprid was 1: 4.2.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Imidaclopride2
- Outcome
- Benefit cost ratioe2
- Value
- 1: 4.2e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Efficacy and Economics of Some Selected Insecticides Against Shoot and Fruit Borer (Earias Vittella) of Okra”
e2“Benefit cost ratio was found highest in Chlorantraniliprole (1: 4.4) followed by Imidacloprid (1: 4.2), Emamectin benzoate (1: 4.2), Spinetoram (1: 3.4), Diafenthiuron (1: 3.3), Flonicamid (1: 3.3), Acephate (1: 3.1) and Control (1: 1.6)”
Claim · model-written summary
Benefit cost ratio for emamectin benzoate was 1: 4.2.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Emamectin benzoatee2
- Outcome
- Benefit cost ratioe2
- Value
- 1: 4.2e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Efficacy and Economics of Some Selected Insecticides Against Shoot and Fruit Borer (Earias Vittella) of Okra”
e2“Benefit cost ratio was found highest in Chlorantraniliprole (1: 4.4) followed by Imidacloprid (1: 4.2), Emamectin benzoate (1: 4.2), Spinetoram (1: 3.4), Diafenthiuron (1: 3.3), Flonicamid (1: 3.3), Acephate (1: 3.1) and Control (1: 1.6)”
Claim · model-written summary
Benefit cost ratio for spinetoram was 1: 3.4.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Spinetorame2
- Outcome
- Benefit cost ratioe2
- Value
- 1: 3.4e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Efficacy and Economics of Some Selected Insecticides Against Shoot and Fruit Borer (Earias Vittella) of Okra”
e2“Benefit cost ratio was found highest in Chlorantraniliprole (1: 4.4) followed by Imidacloprid (1: 4.2), Emamectin benzoate (1: 4.2), Spinetoram (1: 3.4), Diafenthiuron (1: 3.3), Flonicamid (1: 3.3), Acephate (1: 3.1) and Control (1: 1.6)”
Claim · model-written summary
Benefit cost ratio for diafenthiuron was 1: 3.3.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Diafenthiurone2
- Outcome
- Benefit cost ratioe2
- Value
- 1: 3.3e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Efficacy and Economics of Some Selected Insecticides Against Shoot and Fruit Borer (Earias Vittella) of Okra”
e2“Benefit cost ratio was found highest in Chlorantraniliprole (1: 4.4) followed by Imidacloprid (1: 4.2), Emamectin benzoate (1: 4.2), Spinetoram (1: 3.4), Diafenthiuron (1: 3.3), Flonicamid (1: 3.3), Acephate (1: 3.1) and Control (1: 1.6)”
Claim · model-written summary
Benefit cost ratio for flonicamid was 1: 3.3.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Flonicamide2
- Outcome
- Benefit cost ratioe2
- Value
- 1: 3.3e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Efficacy and Economics of Some Selected Insecticides Against Shoot and Fruit Borer (Earias Vittella) of Okra”
e2“Benefit cost ratio was found highest in Chlorantraniliprole (1: 4.4) followed by Imidacloprid (1: 4.2), Emamectin benzoate (1: 4.2), Spinetoram (1: 3.4), Diafenthiuron (1: 3.3), Flonicamid (1: 3.3), Acephate (1: 3.1) and Control (1: 1.6)”
Claim · model-written summary
Benefit cost ratio for acephate was 1: 3.1.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Acephatee2
- Outcome
- Benefit cost ratioe2
- Value
- 1: 3.1e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Efficacy and Economics of Some Selected Insecticides Against Shoot and Fruit Borer (Earias Vittella) of Okra”
e2“Benefit cost ratio was found highest in Chlorantraniliprole (1: 4.4) followed by Imidacloprid (1: 4.2), Emamectin benzoate (1: 4.2), Spinetoram (1: 3.4), Diafenthiuron (1: 3.3), Flonicamid (1: 3.3), Acephate (1: 3.1) and Control (1: 1.6)”
Claim · model-written summary
Benefit cost ratio of the control (no insecticide, water spray) was 1: 1.6.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Controle2
- Outcome
- Benefit cost ratioe2
- Value
- 1: 1.6e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Efficacy and Economics of Some Selected Insecticides Against Shoot and Fruit Borer (Earias Vittella) of Okra”
e2“Benefit cost ratio was found highest in Chlorantraniliprole (1: 4.4) followed by Imidacloprid (1: 4.2), Emamectin benzoate (1: 4.2), Spinetoram (1: 3.4), Diafenthiuron (1: 3.3), Flonicamid (1: 3.3), Acephate (1: 3.1) and Control (1: 1.6)”
The same questions in other papers
chlorantraniliprole · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
14 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.