Paper · 2022 · ENTOMOLOGIA HELLENICA

Evaluation and economic analysis of ecofriendly biological approaches for the management of shoot and fruit borer (Earias vittella F.) of okra

Jaydeep Halder; K. K. Pandey; T. K. Behera

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

During the years 2020 and 2021, the effects of various biopesticides and the egg parasitoid Trichogramma chilonis on the okra shoot and fruit borer were investigated in open fields. All interventions outperformed over the untreated control. The entomopathogenic bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis was the most promising biopesticide tested, with the lowest shoot (5.49% and 6.87% in 2020 and 2021, respectively) and fruit damage (4.95% and 5.65% in 2020 and 2021, respectively), followed by the entomopathogenic fungi Beauveria bassiana (7.08%, 8.04% shoot damage and 6.78% and 6.73% fruit damage during 2020 and 2021, respectively). Interestingly, all biopesticides evaluated were shown to be safe for the polyphagous predators occurring in the okra habitat, such as the ladybird beetles Menochilus sexmaculatus and Micraspis discolour and the spiders Marpissa spp. and Oxyopes lineatipes. However, emamectin benzoate 5% SG was the most effective treatment in terms of minimizing okra shoot and fruit damage, resulting in a maximum percent reduction over control (PROC) (85.54 and 80.90 against shoot damage and 76.60 and 71.33 against fruit damage during 2020 and 2021, respectively). Each treatment's economics were also analysed. The experimental plots treated with emamectin benzoate had the highest cost:benefit ratio (1:11.16), while B. thuringiensis had the highest (1:7.06) among the biopesticide / parasitoid releasing plots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested interventions (biopesticides and the egg parasitoid Trichogramma chilonis) outperformed the untreated control against the okra shoot and fruit borer in open fields.

Treatment
All interventionse0
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellat0pest
Outcome
outperformed over the untreated controle0
Direction
outperformede0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All interventions outperformed over the untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–239 · show in text ↑
t0

“Earias vittella F.) of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus thuringiensis was the most promising biopesticide, giving the lowest okra shoot damage (5.49% in 2020 and 6.87% in 2021).

Treatment
Bacillus thuringiensise0
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellat0pest
Second interactor
Bacillus thuringiensisBacillus thuringiensise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
shoote0
Direction
loweste0
Value
5.49% and 6.87%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus thuringiensis
Bacillus thuringiensis · Second interactorSam LaRussa · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacillus thuringiensis was the most promising biopesticide tested, with the lowest shoot (5.49% and 6.87% in 2020 and 2021, respectively) and fruit damage (4.95% and 5.65% in 2020 and 2021, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–475 · show in text ↑
t0

“Earias vittella F.) of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus thuringiensis gave the lowest okra fruit damage among the biopesticides (4.95% in 2020 and 5.65% in 2021).

Treatment
Bacillus thuringiensise0
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellat0pest
Second interactor
Bacillus thuringiensisBacillus thuringiensise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
fruit damagee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
4.95% and 5.65%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus thuringiensis
Bacillus thuringiensis · Second interactorSam LaRussa · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacillus thuringiensis was the most promising biopesticide tested, with the lowest shoot (5.49% and 6.87% in 2020 and 2021, respectively) and fruit damage (4.95% and 5.65% in 2020 and 2021, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–475 · show in text ↑
t0

“Earias vittella F.) of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beauveria bassiana, next after B. thuringiensis, gave okra shoot damage of 7.08% in 2020 and 8.04% in 2021.

Treatment
Beauveria bassianae0
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellat0pest
Second interactor
Beauveria bassianaBeauveria bassianae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
shoot damagee0
Value
7.08%, 8.04%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Beauveria bassiana
Beauveria bassiana · Second interactorBealeiderman · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Beauveria bassiana (7.08%, 8.04% shoot damage and 6.78% and 6.73% fruit damage during 2020 and 2021, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–630 · show in text ↑
t0

“Earias vittella F.) of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beauveria bassiana gave okra fruit damage of 6.78% in 2020 and 6.73% in 2021.

Treatment
Beauveria bassianae0
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellat0pest
Second interactor
Beauveria bassianaBeauveria bassianae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
fruit damagee0
Value
6.78% and 6.73%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Beauveria bassiana
Beauveria bassiana · Second interactorBealeiderman · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Beauveria bassiana (7.08%, 8.04% shoot damage and 6.78% and 6.73% fruit damage during 2020 and 2021, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–630 · show in text ↑
t0

“Earias vittella F.) of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All biopesticides evaluated were safe for the polyphagous predators (ladybird beetles and spiders) occurring in the okra habitat.

Treatment
biopesticidese0
Interactor
polyphagous predatorse0other
Outcome
safe for the polyphagous predatorse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all biopesticides evaluated were shown to be safe for the polyphagous predators occurring in the okra habitat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–756 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emamectin benzoate 5% SG was the most effective treatment against okra shoot damage, with a maximum percent reduction over control of 85.54 in 2020 and 80.90 in 2021.

Treatment
emamectin benzoate 5% SGe0
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellat0pest
Outcome
shoot damagee0
Direction
minimizinge0
Value
85.54 and 80.90e0
Qualifier
percent reduction over control (PROC)e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“emamectin benzoate 5% SG was the most effective treatment in terms of minimizing okra shoot and fruit damage, resulting in a maximum percent reduction over control (PROC) (85.54 and 80.90 against shoot damage and 76.60 and 71.33 against fruit damage during 2020 and 2021, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–1183 · show in text ↑
t0

“Earias vittella F.) of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emamectin benzoate 5% SG was the most effective treatment against okra fruit damage, with a maximum percent reduction over control of 76.60 in 2020 and 71.33 in 2021.

Treatment
emamectin benzoate 5% SGe0
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellat0pest
Outcome
fruit damagee0
Direction
minimizinge0
Value
76.60 and 71.33e0
Qualifier
percent reduction over control (PROC)e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“emamectin benzoate 5% SG was the most effective treatment in terms of minimizing okra shoot and fruit damage, resulting in a maximum percent reduction over control (PROC) (85.54 and 80.90 against shoot damage and 76.60 and 71.33 against fruit damage during 2020 and 2021, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–1183 · show in text ↑
t0

“Earias vittella F.) of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–142 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Okra plots treated with emamectin benzoate had the highest cost:benefit ratio, 1:11.16.

Treatment
emamectin benzoatee0
Outcome
cost:benefit ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1:11.16e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The experimental plots treated with emamectin benzoate had the highest cost:benefit ratio (1:11.16)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1331 · show in text ↑
t0

“Earias vittella F.) of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–142 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among the biopesticide and parasitoid-release plots, B. thuringiensis had the highest cost:benefit ratio, 1:7.06.

Treatment
B. thuringiensise0
Outcome
higheste0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1:7.06e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while B. thuringiensis had the highest (1:7.06) among the biopesticide / parasitoid releasing plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1432 · show in text ↑
t0

“Earias vittella F.) of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–142 · show in text ↑

Bacillus thuringiensis · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Beauveria bassiana · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

emamectin benzoate · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

21 papers: 21 positive, 0 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

biocontrol · ecology: diversity · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.