Paper · 2023 · Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems

Inoculation of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria improves soil phosphorus mobilization and maize productivity

Isidro Beltran-Medina; Felipe Romero-Perdomo; Lady Molano-Chavez; et al.

7
claims
19
verbatim quotes
36
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria represent a bioalternative in making soil-immobilized phosphorus (P) available to plants, and consequently improve agriculture sustainability and reduce nutrient pollution. In this study, we examined whether Rhizobium sp. B02 inoculation can affect the soil P fractions. Moreover, we investigated how inoculation influences the growth, physiological traits, and productivity of the maize crop. Field tests were carried out to evaluate the combined application of strain B02 and reduced doses of P fertilizer. Soil P fractionation was performed after crop harvesting, assessing the P dynamics. To study the plant response, samplings were carried out in three phenological stages—the vegetative stage of the 7 fully emerged leaves with leaf collars (V7), the vegetative stage of the tassel (VT), and the reproductive stage of physiological maturity (R6). Using 50% of P fertilizer recommended, the strain inoculation increased the labile inorganic P fraction by 14% compared to the control treatment at the same dose, indicating that it favored the Pi mobility. Under these same conditions in the V7 and VT phenological stages, the inoculation significantly improved shoot length (28 and 3%) and shoot dry weight (9.8 and 12%). B02 inoculation increased grain yield by 696 kg ha −1 using 50% of the recommended rate of P fertilizer, phenocopying the complete P fertilization treatment without inoculation. Therefore, Rhizobium sp. B02 inoculation replaced 50% of P fertilizer in maize and increased the soil P availability.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium B02 inoculation with half-rate P fertilizer increased labile inorganic P by 14% over the same-rate control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
strain inoculatione0
Interactor
Rhizobium sp. B02e1symbiont
Outcome
labile inorganic P fractione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
14%e0
Qualifier
50% of P fertilizer recommendede0
Comparator
control treatment at the same dosee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using 50% of P fertilizer recommended, the strain inoculation increased the labile inorganic P fraction by 14% compared to the control treatment at the same dose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1055 · show in text ↑
e1

“Therefore, Rhizobium sp. B02 inoculation replaced 50% of P fertilizer in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1523 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

B02 inoculation increased maize shoot length at V7 by 28%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
V7e0
Treatment
inoculatione0
Interactor
Rhizobium sp. B02e1symbiont
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
improvede0
Value
28e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under these same conditions in the V7 and VT phenological stages, the inoculation significantly improved shoot length (28 and 3%) and shoot dry weight (9.8 and 12%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1265 · show in text ↑
e1

“Therefore, Rhizobium sp. B02 inoculation replaced 50% of P fertilizer in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1523 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

B02 inoculation increased maize shoot length at VT by 3%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
VTe0
Treatment
inoculatione0
Interactor
Rhizobium sp. B02e1symbiont
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
improvede0
Value
3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under these same conditions in the V7 and VT phenological stages, the inoculation significantly improved shoot length (28 and 3%) and shoot dry weight (9.8 and 12%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1265 · show in text ↑
e1

“Therefore, Rhizobium sp. B02 inoculation replaced 50% of P fertilizer in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1523 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

B02 inoculation increased maize shoot dry weight at V7 by 9.8%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
V7e0
Treatment
inoculatione0
Interactor
Rhizobium sp. B02e1symbiont
Outcome
shoot dry weighte0
Direction
improvede0
Value
9.8e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under these same conditions in the V7 and VT phenological stages, the inoculation significantly improved shoot length (28 and 3%) and shoot dry weight (9.8 and 12%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1265 · show in text ↑
e1

“Therefore, Rhizobium sp. B02 inoculation replaced 50% of P fertilizer in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1523 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

B02 inoculation increased maize shoot dry weight at VT by 12%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
VTe0
Treatment
inoculatione0
Interactor
Rhizobium sp. B02e1symbiont
Outcome
shoot dry weighte0
Direction
improvede0
Value
12%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under these same conditions in the V7 and VT phenological stages, the inoculation significantly improved shoot length (28 and 3%) and shoot dry weight (9.8 and 12%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1265 · show in text ↑
e1

“Therefore, Rhizobium sp. B02 inoculation replaced 50% of P fertilizer in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1523 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B02 with half-rate P fertilizer increased maize grain yield by 696 kg ha −1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
B02 inoculatione0
Interactor
Rhizobium sp. B02e1symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
696 kg ha −1e0
Qualifier
50% of the recommended rate of P fertilizere0
Comparator
complete P fertilization treatment without inoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B02 inoculation increased grain yield by 696 kg ha −1 using 50% of the recommended rate of P fertilizer, phenocopying the complete P fertilization treatment without inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1443 · show in text ↑
e1

“Therefore, Rhizobium sp. B02 inoculation replaced 50% of P fertilizer in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1523 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude B02 inoculation can replace half of P fertilizer for maize and increase soil P availability.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Rhizobium sp. B02 inoculatione0
Interactor
Rhizobium sp. B02e0symbiont
Outcome
soil P availabilitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
50%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rhizobium sp. B02 inoculation replaced 50% of P fertilizer in maize and increased the soil P availability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1456–1561 · show in text ↑

inoculation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

538 papers: 479 positive, 59 negative or no effect

478 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

534 papers more in this group

See all 538 papers →

inoculation · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

699 papers: 635 positive, 64 negative or no effect

634 papers in the same direction as this paper · 61 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

695 papers more in this group

See all 699 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.