Paper · 2023 · Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences F Toxicology & Pest Control

Impacts of Some Garlic Extracts on Tomato Growth and Physio-Bio Chemistry Under Infection of Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita

Adel Soliman; Ahmed Khattab; Hamdy Ali; et al.

6
claims
15
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) is one of the most damaging species of plant nematodes to vegetable crops. The efficacy of ethanolic, methanolic and aqueous extracts of garlic for suppression of M. incognita infecting tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) plants were evaluated under greenhouse conditions. Results showed that all tested extracts caused significant reductions (P≤0.05) in the nematode criteria, final population, rate of reproduction and percentages of nematode reduction compared to nematicide and non-treated plants. The methanolic extract at 6 ml/plant caused the best effect on the previous criteria (5536, 1.85 and 92.43%) respectively, compared with the non-treated control. On the other hand, all tested extracts decreased the negative effects of root-knot nematode and an enhancement in the growth parameters of tomato plants. Where the methanolic extract achieved the best results at the highest concentration in both measures of vegetative growth and the chemical content of defensive compounds for plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All garlic extracts significantly reduced nematode final population, reproduction rate and nematode reduction percentages compared with nematicide and non-treated plants

Treatment
ethanolic, methanolic and aqueous extracts of garlice1
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
Outcome
final population, rate of reproduction and percentages of nematode reductione2
Direction
significant reductionse2
Comparator
nematicide and non-treated plantse2
Setting
greenhouse conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The efficacy of ethanolic, methanolic and aqueous extracts of garlic for suppression of M. incognita infecting tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) plants were evaluated under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–311 · show in text ↑
e2

“Results showed that all tested extracts caused significant reductions (P≤0.05) in the nematode criteria, final population, rate of reproduction and percentages of nematode reduction compared to nematicide and non-treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–540 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methanolic extract at 6 ml/plant gave the lowest nematode final population (5536) relative to the non-treated control

Treatment
methanolic extract at 6 ml/plante3
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
Outcome
final populatione2
Direction
decreaseinferrede2
Value
5536e3
Comparator
non-treated controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The efficacy of ethanolic, methanolic and aqueous extracts of garlic for suppression of M. incognita infecting tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) plants were evaluated under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–311 · show in text ↑
e2

“Results showed that all tested extracts caused significant reductions (P≤0.05) in the nematode criteria, final population, rate of reproduction and percentages of nematode reduction compared to nematicide and non-treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–540 · show in text ↑
e3

“The methanolic extract at 6 ml/plant caused the best effect on the previous criteria (5536, 1.85 and 92.43%) respectively, compared with the non-treated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–702 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methanolic extract at 6 ml/plant gave the lowest rate of nematode reproduction (1.85) relative to the non-treated control

Treatment
methanolic extract at 6 ml/plante3
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
Outcome
rate of reproductione2
Direction
decreaseinferrede2
Value
1.85e3
Comparator
non-treated controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The efficacy of ethanolic, methanolic and aqueous extracts of garlic for suppression of M. incognita infecting tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) plants were evaluated under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–311 · show in text ↑
e2

“Results showed that all tested extracts caused significant reductions (P≤0.05) in the nematode criteria, final population, rate of reproduction and percentages of nematode reduction compared to nematicide and non-treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–540 · show in text ↑
e3

“The methanolic extract at 6 ml/plant caused the best effect on the previous criteria (5536, 1.85 and 92.43%) respectively, compared with the non-treated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–702 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methanolic extract at 6 ml/plant gave the highest percentage of nematode reduction (92.43%) relative to the non-treated control

Treatment
methanolic extract at 6 ml/plante3
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
Outcome
percentages of nematode reductione2
Direction
increaseinferrede2
Value
92.43%e3
Comparator
non-treated controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The efficacy of ethanolic, methanolic and aqueous extracts of garlic for suppression of M. incognita infecting tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) plants were evaluated under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–311 · show in text ↑
e2

“Results showed that all tested extracts caused significant reductions (P≤0.05) in the nematode criteria, final population, rate of reproduction and percentages of nematode reduction compared to nematicide and non-treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–540 · show in text ↑
e3

“The methanolic extract at 6 ml/plant caused the best effect on the previous criteria (5536, 1.85 and 92.43%) respectively, compared with the non-treated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–702 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All garlic extracts enhanced tomato growth parameters and reduced the negative effects of root-knot nematode

Treatment
all tested extractse1
Interactor
root-knot nematodeMeloidogynee1pathogen
Outcome
growth parameterse1
Direction
enhancemente1
Comparator
non-treated plantse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“On the other hand, all tested extracts decreased the negative effects of root-knot nematode and an enhancement in the growth parameters of tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–856 · show in text ↑
e2

“Results showed that all tested extracts caused significant reductions (P≤0.05) in the nematode criteria, final population, rate of reproduction and percentages of nematode reduction compared to nematicide and non-treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–540 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methanolic extract at the highest concentration gave the best results in vegetative growth and in the chemical content of defensive compounds of tomato

Treatment
methanolic extracte2
Outcome
vegetative growth and the chemical content of defensive compoundse2
Direction
best resultse2
Qualifier
at the highest concentratione2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The efficacy of ethanolic, methanolic and aqueous extracts of garlic for suppression of M. incognita infecting tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) plants were evaluated under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–311 · show in text ↑
e2

“Where the methanolic extract achieved the best results at the highest concentration in both measures of vegetative growth and the chemical content of defensive compounds for plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–1038 · show in text ↑

Allium sativum · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

botanical · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

117 papers: 115 positive, 2 negative or no effect

114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

113 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

botanical · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 203 positive, 88 negative or no effect

202 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

287 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

botanical · Meloidogyne · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

37 papers: 37 positive, 0 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.