Paper · 2023 · Horticulturae

Effects of Exogenously Applied Copper in Tomato Plants’ Oxidative and Nitrogen Metabolisms under Organic Farming Conditions

Alexandre Alves; Rafael Ribeiro; Manuel Azenha; et al.

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Currently, copper is approved as an active substance among plant protection products and is considered effective against more than 50 different diseases in different crops, conventional and organic. Tomato has been cultivated for centuries, but many fungal diseases still affect it, making it necessary to control them through antifungal agents, such as copper, making it the primary form of fungal control in organic farming systems (OFS). The objective of this work was to determine whether exogenous copper applications can affect AOX mechanisms and nitrogen use efficiency in tomato plant grown in OFS. For this purpose, plants were sprayed with ‘Bordeaux’ mixture (SP). In addition, two sets of plants were each treated with 8 mg/L copper in the root substrate (S). Subsequently, one of these groups was also sprayed with a solution of ‘Bordeaux’ mixture (SSP). Leaves and roots were used to determine NR, GS and GDH activities, as well as proline, H2O2 and AsA levels. The data gathered show that even small amounts of copper in the rhizosphere and copper spraying can lead to stress responses in tomato, with increases in total ascorbate of up to 70% and a decrease in GS activity down to 49%, suggesting that excess copper application could be potentially harmful in horticultural production by OFS.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper supplied to the rhizosphere and by spraying induced tomato stress responses.

Treatment
copper sprayinge0
Outcome
stress responsese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“even small amounts of copper in the rhizosphere and copper spraying can lead to stress responses in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1109 · show in text ↑
e1

“two sets of plants were each treated with 8 mg/L copper in the root substrate (S)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–769 · show in text ↑
e2

“plants were sprayed with ‘Bordeaux’ mixture (SP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–673 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper treatment raised total ascorbate by up to 70%.

Treatment
copper sprayinge1
Outcome
total ascorbatee0
Direction
increasese0
Value
up to 70%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increases in total ascorbate of up to 70%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1157 · show in text ↑
e1

“even small amounts of copper in the rhizosphere and copper spraying can lead to stress responses in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper treatment reduced GS activity to 49%.

Treatment
copper sprayinge1
Gene
GSe0
Outcome
GS activitye0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
down to 49%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a decrease in GS activity down to 49%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1199 · show in text ↑
e1

“even small amounts of copper in the rhizosphere and copper spraying can lead to stress responses in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1109 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors warn that excess copper could harm organic horticultural production.

Outcome
excess copper application could be potentially harmful in horticultural production by OFSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“excess copper application could be potentially harmful in horticultural production by OFS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1306 · show in text ↑
e1

“stress responses in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1109 · show in text ↑

copper atom · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

copper atom · physiology: gas exchange · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

application · physiology: gas exchange · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

application · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 38 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.