Paper · 2022 · Semina Ciências Agrárias

Induction of salt stress tolerance in cherry tomatoes under different salicylic acid application methods

André Alisson Rodrigues da Silva; Luana Lucas de Sá Almeida Veloso; Geovani Soares de Lima; et al.

4
claims
10
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Salinity is among the biggest challenges of irrigated agriculture, as it induces several limitations to the growth and physiology of plants; therefore, strategies should be sought that minimize its impacts on plants. In this scenario, the present study was developed to examine the effects of different salicylic acid (SA) application methods on photosynthetic pigments, chlorophyll a fluorescence, gas exchange, and biomass accumulation of cherry tomato under salt stress. The study was carried out in a greenhouse, using a Regosol soil (Psamments) with a sandy-loam texture. The treatments were distributed in a completely randomized design, in a 2 × 4 factorial arrangement consisting of two levels of electrical conductivity in the irrigation water (0.6 or 2.6 dS m-1) and four salicylic acid application methods (M1 = without SA [control] application; M2 = foliar spray; M3 = irrigation; or M4 = spray and irrigation), with five replicates. Irrigation with 2.6 dS m-1 salinity water negatively affected chlorophyll a fluorescence and the total chlorophyll, chlorophyll a, and carotenoid contents, in addition to inhibiting stem dry biomass production and root/shoot ratio. Foliar spray with salicylic acid minimized the deleterious effects of salt stress on gas exchange and chlorophyll content and increased leaf and root dry biomass accumulation and the root/shoot ratio of cherry tomatoes at 120 days after sowing.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saline irrigation negatively affected chlorophyll fluorescence and pigment contents.

Treatment
2.6 dS m-1 salinity watere0
Outcome
chlorophyll a fluorescence and the total chlorophyll, chlorophyll a, and carotenoid contentse0
Comparator
0.6e1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation with 2.6 dS m-1 salinity water negatively affected chlorophyll a fluorescence and the total chlorophyll, chlorophyll a, and carotenoid contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1100 · show in text ↑
e1

“two levels of electrical conductivity in the irrigation water (0.6 or 2.6 dS m-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–772 · show in text ↑
t0

“cherry tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saline irrigation inhibited stem dry biomass production and root to shoot ratio.

Organ / stage
steme0
Treatment
2.6 dS m-1 salinity watere0
Outcome
stem dry biomass production and root/shoot ratioe0
Direction
inhibitinge0
Comparator
0.6e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation with 2.6 dS m-1 salinity water negatively affected chlorophyll a fluorescence and the total chlorophyll, chlorophyll a, and carotenoid contents, in addition to inhibiting stem dry biomass production and root/shoot ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1177 · show in text ↑
e1

“two levels of electrical conductivity in the irrigation water (0.6 or 2.6 dS m-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–772 · show in text ↑
t0

“cherry tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar salicylic acid minimized adverse salt effects on gas exchange and chlorophyll content.

Treatment
Foliar spray with salicylic acide0
Outcome
gas exchange and chlorophyll contente0
Direction
minimizede0
Qualifier
salt stresse0
Comparator
without SA [control] applicatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar spray with salicylic acid minimized the deleterious effects of salt stress on gas exchange and chlorophyll content and increased leaf and root dry biomass accumulation and the root/shoot ratio of cherry tomatoes at 120 days after sowing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1422 · show in text ↑
e1

“M1 = without SA [control] application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–855 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar salicylic acid increased leaf and root biomass and root to shoot ratio at 120 days.

Treatment
Foliar spray with salicylic acide0
Outcome
leaf and root dry biomass accumulation and the root/shoot ratioe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
at 120 days after sowinge0
Comparator
without SA [control] applicatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar spray with salicylic acid minimized the deleterious effects of salt stress on gas exchange and chlorophyll content and increased leaf and root dry biomass accumulation and the root/shoot ratio of cherry tomatoes at 120 days after sowing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1422 · show in text ↑
e1

“M1 = without SA [control] application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–855 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

61 papers: 58 positive, 3 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

salicylic acid · physiology: gas exchange · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

salinity · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

71 papers: 11 positive, 60 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

application · physiology: gas exchange · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

salinity · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

160 papers: 18 positive, 142 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

156 papers more in this group

See all 160 papers →

application · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

253 papers: 225 positive, 28 negative or no effect

224 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

249 papers more in this group

See all 253 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.