Paper · 1988 · American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Response to NaCl of Grapevines Regenerated from Multiple-Shoot Cultures Exhibiting Mild Salt Tolerancein vitro

K. G. M. Skene; M. Barlass

2
claims
5
verbatim quotes
8
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The response to NaCl of glasshouse-grown plants of Vitis vinifera cv. Cabernet Sauvignon and V. champini cv. Ramsey is described. The grapevines had been regenerated from in vitro multiple-shoot cultures that had shown a partial growth recovery, after an initial inhibition, when exposed to media containing between 50 and 100 mM NaCl for a minimum period of nine months. The plants were compared with others regenerated from cultures that had received no NaCl. Response in the glasshouse, in terms of both growth and chloride uptake, was virtually the same, irrespective of whether plants had received NaCl during in vitro culture. It is concluded that the apparent tolerance to elevated chloride levels in vitro was a temporary physiological adaptation to culture conditions, which did not persist in whole plants regenerated from culture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glasshouse growth and chloride uptake of grapevines did not differ between plants from NaCl-exposed and unexposed in vitro cultures.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Material
Cabernet Sauvignone0
Treatment
NaCl during in vitro culturee2
Outcome
growth and chloride uptakee2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2
Comparator
cultures that had received no NaCle1
Setting
glasshousee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The response to NaCl of glasshouse-grown plants of Vitis vinifera cv. Cabernet Sauvignon and V. champini cv. Ramsey is described”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–128 · show in text ↑
e1

“The plants were compared with others regenerated from cultures that had received no NaCl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–460 · show in text ↑
e2

“Response in the glasshouse, in terms of both growth and chloride uptake, was virtually the same, irrespective of whether plants had received NaCl during in vitro culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–631 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The apparent in vitro tolerance to elevated chloride was a temporary adaptation to culture conditions that did not persist in whole regenerated grapevines.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Outcome
apparent tolerance to elevated chloride levels in vitroe3
Qualifier
temporary physiological adaptation to culture conditionse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The response to NaCl of glasshouse-grown plants of Vitis vinifera cv. Cabernet Sauvignon and V. champini cv. Ramsey is described”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–128 · show in text ↑
e3

“It is concluded that the apparent tolerance to elevated chloride levels in vitro was a temporary physiological adaptation to culture conditions, which did not persist in whole plants regenerated from culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–840 · show in text ↑

sodium chloride · growth · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results differ

6 papers: 0 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

in vitro · growth · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.