Paper · 2022 · Frontiers in Microbiology

Soybean continuous cropping affects yield by changing soil chemical properties and microbial community richness

Yan Li; Chuanqi Shi; Dan Wei; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
43
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In agroecosystems, different cropping patterns cause changes in soil physicochemical properties and thus in microbial communities, which in turn affect crop yields. In this study, the yields of soybean continuous cropping for 5 years (C5), 10 years (C10), and 20 years (C20) and of soybean-corn rotational cropping (R) treatments were determined, and samples of the tillage layer soil were collected. High-throughput sequencing technology was used to analyze the diversity and composition of the soil bacterial and fungal communities. The factors influencing microbial communities, along with the effects of these communities and those of soil chemical indexes on yield, were further evaluated. The results showed that the community richness index of bacteria was higher in C20 than in R and that of fungi was highest in C5. The differences in the bacterial and fungal communities diversity indexes were not significant among the different continuous cropping treatments, respectively. The soil microbial community composition of all continuous cropping treatments differed significantly from R. The dominant bacterial phylum was Actinobacteriota and the dominant fungal phylum was Ascomycota. The relative abundance of Fusarium did not differ significantly among the continuous cropping treatments, while that of the plant pathogen fungi Lectera sp., Plectosphaerella sp., and Volutella sp. increased with continuous cropping years. Soil pH, SOM, N, and TP had significant effects on both bacterial and fungal communities, and TK and C/N had highly significant effects on fungal communities. The yield of C5 was significantly lower than that of R, and the differences in yield between C10, C20, and R were not significant. TN, TP, and pH had significant effects on yield, and fungal community abundance had a greater negative effect on yield than bacterial community abundance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial richness was higher after 20 years of continuous soybean than in rotation.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
C20e0
Outcome
community richness index of bacteriae0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Re0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“community richness index of bacteria was higher in C20 than in R”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–787 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal richness was highest after five years of continuous cropping.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
C5e0
Outcome
that of fungie0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“that of fungi was highest in C5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–823 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial and fungal diversity indexes did not differ significantly among continuous cropping treatments.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
different continuous cropping treatmentse0
Outcome
bacterial and fungal communities diversity indexese0
Comparator
different continuous cropping treatmentse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“differences in the bacterial and fungal communities diversity indexes were not significant among the different continuous cropping treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–970 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil microbial composition differed significantly between continuous cropping and rotation.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
all continuous cropping treatmentse0
Outcome
soil microbial community compositione0
Direction
differede0
Comparator
Re0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil microbial community composition of all continuous cropping treatments differed significantly from R”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1094 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Actinobacteriota was the dominant bacterial phylum and Ascomycota the dominant fungal phylum.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
dominant bacterial phylum was Actinobacteriota and the dominant fungal phylum was Ascomycotae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dominant bacterial phylum was Actinobacteriota and the dominant fungal phylum was Ascomycota”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1192 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium abundance did not differ significantly among continuous cropping treatments.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
continuous cropping treatmentse0
Interactor
FusariumFusariume0pathogen
Outcome
relative abundance of Fusariume0
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
continuous cropping treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“relative abundance of Fusarium did not differ significantly among the continuous cropping treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1298 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lectera sp., Plectosphaerella sp. and Volutella sp. increased with years of continuous cropping.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
continuous cropping yearse0
Interactor
Lectera sp.Lecterae0pathogen
Second interactor
Plectosphaerella sp.Plectosphaerellae0pathogen
Outcome
plant pathogen fungi Lectera sp., Plectosphaerella sp., and Volutella sp.e0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
Volutella sp.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant pathogen fungi Lectera sp., Plectosphaerella sp., and Volutella sp. increased with continuous cropping years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1432 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pH, SOM, N and TP significantly affected bacterial and fungal communities.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
bacterial and fungal communitiese0
Setting
Soile0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil pH, SOM, N, and TP had significant effects on both bacterial and fungal communities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1434–1522 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TK and C/N highly significantly affected fungal communities.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
fungal communitiese0
Setting
TK and C/Ne0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TK and C/N had highly significant effects on fungal communities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1528–1591 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Five years of continuous cropping significantly reduced soybean yield relative to rotation.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
C5e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
Re0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield of C5 was significantly lower than that of R”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1597–1647 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield under C10 and C20 did not differ significantly from rotation.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
C10, C20e0
Outcome
yielde0
Comparator
Re0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“differences in yield between C10, C20, and R were not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1657–1722 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TN, TP and pH significantly affected yield.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
yielde0
Setting
TN, TP, and pHe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TN, TP, and pH had significant effects on yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1724–1771 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal community abundance had a greater negative effect on yield than bacterial community abundance.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
negativee0
Comparator
bacterial community abundancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fungal community abundance had a greater negative effect on yield than bacterial community abundance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1777–1877 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑

rotation · Fusarium · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

rotation · soil: biology · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.