Paper · 2022 · Indian Journal Of Nematology

Biological Control of Rice Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne graminicola in Transplanted Rice

Vinod Kumar; K. K. Verma; Anil Kumar; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The current study is designed for the management of rice root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne graminicola in rice (Oryza sativa L.) under laboratory, nursery and field conditions. Under laboratory conditions, all the substances viz., phytotherapeutic substances, rhizobacteria and chemicals inhibited the juvenile mortality of M. graminicola at all dilution levels at each interval of exposure periods. Among the rhizobacterial strains and plant extracts, the maximum juvenile mortality was observed in Azotobacter chroococcum (HT 54) which is statistically at par with aqueous extracts of Azadirachta indica and only 65.2 and 61.8% juvenile mortality was observed in this case, respectively. However, A. chroococcum, A. indica and carbosulfan gave maximum mortality at 1:5 and 1:10 dilutions irrespective of period of exposure. Under nursery conditions, treatments of neem cake @ 50g/pot (5 kg soil capacity) in combination with Pseudomonas fluorescens @ 50 g/pot significantly reduced the nematode reproduction and multiplication and improved the plant growth parameters of rice (var. PB 1121). In main field experiment, where treated nursery treatments were integrated with main field treatments, significantly highest and maximum yield (51.25 q/ha) was obtained in combination of treated nursery (neem cake @ 50g/pot+ P. fluorescens @ 50 g/pot) and two deep summer ploughing during the month of June also significantly reduced the nematode reproduction and multiplication. So, combination of treated nursery with neem cake and P. fluorescens along with deep summer ploughing in the main field before transplanting has reduced the nematode population and enhanced rice yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobacter chroococcum (HT 54) produced high M. graminicola juvenile mortality in the laboratory.

Treatment
Azotobacter chroococcum (HT 54)e0
Interactor
Meloidogyne graminicolaMeloidogyne graminicolat0pest
Outcome
juvenile mortalitye0
Direction
maximume0
Value
65.2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum juvenile mortality was observed in Azotobacter chroococcum (HT 54) which is statistically at par with aqueous extracts of Azadirachta indica and only 65.2 and 61.8% juvenile mortality was observed in this case, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–687 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biological Control of Rice Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne graminicola in Transplanted Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

aqueous extracts of Azadirachta indica produced high M. graminicola juvenile mortality in the laboratory.

Treatment
aqueous extracts of Azadirachta indicae0
Interactor
Meloidogyne graminicolaMeloidogyne graminicolat0pest
Outcome
juvenile mortalitye0
Direction
maximume0
Value
61.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum juvenile mortality was observed in Azotobacter chroococcum (HT 54) which is statistically at par with aqueous extracts of Azadirachta indica and only 65.2 and 61.8% juvenile mortality was observed in this case, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–687 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biological Control of Rice Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne graminicola in Transplanted Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. chroococcum gave maximum nematode mortality at 1:5 and 1:10 dilutions.

Treatment
A. chroococcume0
Interactor
Meloidogyne graminicolaMeloidogyne graminicolat0pest
Outcome
mortalitye0
Direction
maximume0
Qualifier
1:5 and 1:10 dilutionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A. chroococcum, A. indica and carbosulfan gave maximum mortality at 1:5 and 1:10 dilutions irrespective of period of exposure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–823 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biological Control of Rice Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne graminicola in Transplanted Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. indica gave maximum nematode mortality at 1:5 and 1:10 dilutions.

Treatment
A. indicae0
Interactor
Meloidogyne graminicolaMeloidogyne graminicolat0pest
Outcome
mortalitye0
Direction
maximume0
Qualifier
1:5 and 1:10 dilutionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A. chroococcum, A. indica and carbosulfan gave maximum mortality at 1:5 and 1:10 dilutions irrespective of period of exposure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–823 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biological Control of Rice Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne graminicola in Transplanted Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

carbosulfan gave maximum nematode mortality at 1:5 and 1:10 dilutions.

Treatment
carbosulfane0
Interactor
Meloidogyne graminicolaMeloidogyne graminicolat0pest
Outcome
mortalitye0
Direction
maximume0
Qualifier
1:5 and 1:10 dilutionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A. chroococcum, A. indica and carbosulfan gave maximum mortality at 1:5 and 1:10 dilutions irrespective of period of exposure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–823 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biological Control of Rice Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne graminicola in Transplanted Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem cake plus Pseudomonas fluorescens reduced nematode reproduction and multiplication in rice nursery plants.

Material
PB 1121e0
Treatment
neem cake @ 50g/pot (5 kg soil capacity) in combination with Pseudomonas fluorescens @ 50 g/pote0
Interactor
Meloidogyne graminicolaMeloidogyne graminicolat0pest
Second interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
nematode reproduction and multiplicatione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · Second interactorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatments of neem cake @ 50g/pot (5 kg soil capacity) in combination with Pseudomonas fluorescens @ 50 g/pot significantly reduced the nematode reproduction and multiplication and improved the plant growth parameters of rice (var. PB 1121).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–1091 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biological Control of Rice Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne graminicola in Transplanted Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The nursery treatment improved rice plant growth parameters.

Material
PB 1121e0
Treatment
neem cake @ 50g/pot (5 kg soil capacity) in combination with Pseudomonas fluorescens @ 50 g/pote0
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
plant growth parameterse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatments of neem cake @ 50g/pot (5 kg soil capacity) in combination with Pseudomonas fluorescens @ 50 g/pot significantly reduced the nematode reproduction and multiplication and improved the plant growth parameters of rice (var. PB 1121).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–1091 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The treated nursery plus two deep summer ploughings produced the highest rice yield.

Treatment
treated nursery (neem cake @ 50g/pot+ P. fluorescens @ 50 g/pot) and two deep summer ploughinge0
Interactor
P. fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
51.25 q/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly highest and maximum yield (51.25 q/ha) was obtained in combination of treated nursery (neem cake @ 50g/pot+ P. fluorescens @ 50 g/pot) and two deep summer ploughing during the month of June also significantly reduced the nematode reproduction and multiplication.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1471 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biological Control of Rice Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne graminicola in Transplanted Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated nursery and ploughing treatment reduced nematode reproduction and multiplication.

Treatment
treated nursery (neem cake @ 50g/pot+ P. fluorescens @ 50 g/pot) and two deep summer ploughinge0
Interactor
Meloidogyne graminicolaMeloidogyne graminicolat0pest
Second interactor
P. fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
nematode reproduction and multiplicatione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · Second interactorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly highest and maximum yield (51.25 q/ha) was obtained in combination of treated nursery (neem cake @ 50g/pot+ P. fluorescens @ 50 g/pot) and two deep summer ploughing during the month of June also significantly reduced the nematode reproduction and multiplication.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1471 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biological Control of Rice Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne graminicola in Transplanted Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑

Pseudomonas fluorescens · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

31 papers: 30 positive, 1 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Azadirachta indica · Meloidogyne graminicola · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

carbosulfan · Meloidogyne graminicola · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Pseudomonas fluorescens · Meloidogyne graminicola · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Pseudomonas fluorescens · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

23 papers: 23 positive, 0 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

botanical · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

208 papers: 193 positive, 15 negative or no effect

192 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

204 papers more in this group

See all 208 papers →

botanical · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

211 papers: 133 positive, 78 negative or no effect

132 papers in the same direction as this paper · 78 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

207 papers more in this group

See all 211 papers →

tillage · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

729 papers: 587 positive, 142 negative or no effect

586 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 27 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

725 papers more in this group

See all 729 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.