Paper · 2012 · Biocontrol Science and Technology

Biological control of rice root-knot nematode,Meloidogyne graminicolathrough mixture ofPseudomonas fluorescensstrains

N. Seenivasan; P.M.M. David; P. Vivekanandan; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
57
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The plant growth promoting rhizobacterium, Pseudomonas fluorescens strains PF1, TDK1, and PY15 were evaluated individually and in combinations for their efficacy against root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne graminicola, in rice plants under in vitro, glass house and field conditions. Culture filtrates of these strains either individually or as mixture inhibited egg hatching and caused mortality of juveniles of M. graminicola in vitro. The efficacy was more pronounced when filtrates of the strain were used as mixtures than as individual strains. Mixtures of P. fluorescens strains signficantly reduced M. graminicola infestation when applied as bacterial suspensions through seed treatment. The higher activity of peroxidase and chitinase enzymes was observed in plants treated with P. fluorescens mixtures than the plants treated with individual strains, two strain mixtures and untreated control. In field trials on rice, talc formulations of the P. fluorescens strains individually as well as mixtures were evaluated as seed treatment, soil treatment and combination of both. A mixture of the three strains was the most effective when applied either as seed + soil treatment or as seed treatment alone. The introduced P. fluorescens strains survived endophytically on rice roots. The application of the P. fluorescens mixture PF1 + TDK1 + PY15 in seed + soil treatment resulted in higher grain yield which provided a 27.3% increase over the control followed by P. fluorescens mixture PF1 + TDK1 + PY15 in seed treatment alone, which increased the grain yield of rice by 24.7% compared to the control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Culture filtrates of the bacterial strains inhibited nematode egg hatching.

Treatment
Culture filtrates of these strainse0
Interactor
M. graminicolaMeloidogyne graminicolae0pathogen
Outcome
egg hatchinge0
Direction
inhibitede0
Setting
in vitroe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–26 · show in text ↑
e0

“Culture filtrates of these strains either individually or as mixture inhibited egg hatching and caused mortality of juveniles of M. graminicola in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–441 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The filtrates caused juvenile nematode mortality in vitro.

Treatment
Culture filtrates of these strainse0
Interactor
M. graminicolaMeloidogyne graminicolae0pathogen
Outcome
mortality of juveniles of M. graminicolae0
Direction
causede0
Setting
in vitroe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–26 · show in text ↑
e0

“Culture filtrates of these strains either individually or as mixture inhibited egg hatching and caused mortality of juveniles of M. graminicola in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–441 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixtures of filtrates were more effective than individual strains.

Treatment
filtrates of the strain were used as mixturese0
Outcome
efficacye0
Direction
more pronouncede0
Comparator
individual strainse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–26 · show in text ↑
e0

“The efficacy was more pronounced when filtrates of the strain were used as mixtures than as individual strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–553 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment with bacterial strain mixtures significantly reduced nematode infestation.

Treatment
bacterial suspensions through seed treatmente0
Interactor
M. graminicolaMeloidogyne graminicolae0pathogen
Second interactor
P. fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
M. graminicola infestatione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · Second interactorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–26 · show in text ↑
e0

“Mixtures of P. fluorescens strains signficantly reduced M. graminicola infestation when applied as bacterial suspensions through seed treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–698 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants treated with the three strain mixture had higher peroxidase and chitinase activity than the comparison groups.

Treatment
P. fluorescens mixturese0
Interactor
P. fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
activity of peroxidase and chitinase enzymese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
individual strains, two strain mixtures and untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–26 · show in text ↑
e0

“The higher activity of peroxidase and chitinase enzymes was observed in plants treated with P. fluorescens mixtures than the plants treated with individual strains, two strain mixtures and untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–906 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three strain mixture was most effective as combined seed and soil treatment or seed treatment alone.

Treatment
A mixture of the three strainse0
Outcome
most effectivee0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–26 · show in text ↑
e0

“A mixture of the three strains was the most effective when applied either as seed + soil treatment or as seed treatment alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1213 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Introduced bacterial strains survived inside rice roots.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Interactor
P. fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0symbiont
Outcome
survived endophytically on rice rootse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–26 · show in text ↑
e0

“The introduced P. fluorescens strains survived endophytically on rice roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1290 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined seed and soil treatment raised grain yield by 27.3% over control.

Treatment
P. fluorescens mixture PF1 + TDK1 + PY15 in seed + soil treatmente0
Interactor
P. fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
27.3%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–26 · show in text ↑
e0

“The application of the P. fluorescens mixture PF1 + TDK1 + PY15 in seed + soil treatment resulted in higher grain yield which provided a 27.3% increase over the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1460 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment alone raised rice grain yield by 24.7% over control.

Treatment
P. fluorescens mixture PF1 + TDK1 + PY15 in seed treatment alonee0
Interactor
P. fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
24.7%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–26 · show in text ↑
e0

“P. fluorescens mixture PF1 + TDK1 + PY15 in seed treatment alone, which increased the grain yield of rice by 24.7% compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1473–1611 · show in text ↑

Pseudomonas fluorescens · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

31 papers: 30 positive, 1 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Pseudomonas fluorescens · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

166 papers: 159 positive, 7 negative or no effect

158 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

162 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

seed treatment · Meloidogyne graminicola · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.