Paper · 2020 · Journal of Applied Microbiology

Biomanagement of rice root‐knot nematode Meloidogyne graminicola using five indigenous microbial isolates under pot and field trials

M.R. Khan; Z. Haque; F. Ahamad; et al.

14
claims
39
verbatim quotes
29
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

AIMS: To ascertain the effectiveness of Aspergillus niger, Trichoderma harzianum, Pochonia chlamydosporia, Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas fluorescens against rice root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne graminicola, and to optimize their application methods. METHODS AND RESULTS: The relative effectiveness of five indigenous biocontrol agents (BCA) against M. graminicola on rice cv. PS-5 was tested initially in pot culture. The BCAs, A. niger, P. chlamydosporia and P. fluorescens proved more effective, and significantly reduced the nematode disease. It is hypothesized that success of a biocontrol module may vary with the BCA and application methods. Hence, the effectiveness of the above three BCAs as well as seven different treatment schemes were evaluated in naturally infested farmer's fields during 2 consecutive years. In nematode-infested plots without any BCA treatments, terminal galls formed on the roots, and plants suffered a 19-31% decrease in the growth and yield. The treatments with P. chlamydosporia or A. niger through root-dip (RD) plus one soil application (SA) at 15 days after planting were found to be highly effective against the nematode. CONCLUSIONS: Relatively greater nematode control was achieved with RD plus two SAs (15 + 30 DAP) but statistically the effect was on par with RD + one SA at 15 DAP. These treatments significantly reduced galling (22-25%), egg mass production (21-29%) and reproduction factor (63-70%) of M. graminicola, and subsequently increased the grain yield (11-21%). SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Application methods enhanced the effectiveness of BCAs against M. graminicola. The RD plus one SA at 15 DAP proved to be most effective treatment to control root-knot disease in rice. Use of multiple treatments (root dip and SA) appears cumbersome, but in view of effectiveness and limitation of chemical control in rice paddies, farmers may adopt the above module that may lead to 11-21% yield improvement.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A. niger significantly reduced nematode disease in rice pot culture.

Material
PS-5e1
Treatment
A. nigere0
Interactor
Meloidogyne graminicolaMeloidogyne graminicolae2pathogen
Second interactor
A. nigerAspergillus nigere0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
nematode diseasee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus niger
Aspergillus niger · Second interactorNo machine-readable author provided. Y tambe assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The BCAs, A. niger, P. chlamydosporia and P. fluorescens proved more effective, and significantly reduced the nematode disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–548 · show in text ↑
e1

“on rice cv. PS-5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–384 · show in text ↑
e2

“rice root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne graminicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–209 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

P. chlamydosporia significantly reduced nematode disease in rice pot culture.

Material
PS-5e1
Treatment
P. chlamydosporiae0
Interactor
Meloidogyne graminicolaMeloidogyne graminicolae2pathogen
Second interactor
P. chlamydosporiaPochonia chlamydosporiae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
nematode diseasee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The BCAs, A. niger, P. chlamydosporia and P. fluorescens proved more effective, and significantly reduced the nematode disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–548 · show in text ↑
e1

“on rice cv. PS-5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–384 · show in text ↑
e2

“rice root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne graminicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–209 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

P. fluorescens significantly reduced nematode disease in rice pot culture.

Material
PS-5e1
Treatment
P. fluorescense0
Interactor
Meloidogyne graminicolaMeloidogyne graminicolae2pathogen
Second interactor
P. fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
nematode diseasee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · Second interactorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The BCAs, A. niger, P. chlamydosporia and P. fluorescens proved more effective, and significantly reduced the nematode disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–548 · show in text ↑
e1

“on rice cv. PS-5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–384 · show in text ↑
e2

“rice root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne graminicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–209 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In untreated infested plots, root galls formed and rice growth and yield declined by 19-31%.

Interactor
Meloidogyne graminicolaMeloidogyne graminicolae2pathogen
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
19-31%e0
Qualifier
terminal galls formed on the rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In nematode-infested plots without any BCA treatments, terminal galls formed on the roots, and plants suffered a 19-31% decrease in the growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–979 · show in text ↑
e1

“on rice cv. PS-5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–384 · show in text ↑
e2

“rice root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne graminicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–209 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root-dip plus one soil application of P. chlamydosporia at 15 days after planting was highly effective against the nematode.

Treatment
P. chlamydosporiae0
Interactor
Meloidogyne graminicolaMeloidogyne graminicolae2pathogen
Second interactor
P. chlamydosporiaPochonia chlamydosporiae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
effective against the nematodee0
Direction
highly effectivee0
Qualifier
root-dip (RD) plus one soil application (SA) at 15 days after plantinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments with P. chlamydosporia or A. niger through root-dip (RD) plus one soil application (SA) at 15 days after planting were found to be highly effective against the nematode”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1164 · show in text ↑
e1

“on rice cv. PS-5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–384 · show in text ↑
e2

“rice root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne graminicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–209 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root-dip plus one soil application of A. niger at 15 days after planting was highly effective against the nematode.

Treatment
A. nigere0
Interactor
Meloidogyne graminicolaMeloidogyne graminicolae2pathogen
Second interactor
A. nigerAspergillus nigere0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
effective against the nematodee0
Direction
highly effectivee0
Qualifier
root-dip (RD) plus one soil application (SA) at 15 days after plantinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus niger
Aspergillus niger · Second interactorNo machine-readable author provided. Y tambe assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments with P. chlamydosporia or A. niger through root-dip (RD) plus one soil application (SA) at 15 days after planting were found to be highly effective against the nematode”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1164 · show in text ↑
e1

“on rice cv. PS-5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–384 · show in text ↑
e2

“rice root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne graminicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–209 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root-dip plus two soil applications achieved relatively greater nematode control than one soil application, but the difference was statistically on par.

Treatment
RD plus two SAs (15 + 30 DAP)e0
Interactor
Meloidogyne graminicolaMeloidogyne graminicolae2pathogen
Outcome
nematode controle0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
RD + one SA at 15 DAPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relatively greater nematode control was achieved with RD plus two SAs (15 + 30 DAP) but statistically the effect was on par with RD + one SA at 15 DAP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1329 · show in text ↑
e1

“on rice cv. PS-5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–384 · show in text ↑
e2

“rice root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne graminicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–209 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The biocontrol treatments reduced M. graminicola galling by 22-25%.

Treatment
These treatmentse0
Interactor
M. graminicolaMeloidogyne graminicolae0pathogen
Outcome
gallinge0
Direction
reducede0
Value
22-25%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These treatments significantly reduced galling (22-25%), egg mass production (21-29%) and reproduction factor (63-70%) of M. graminicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1467 · show in text ↑
e1

“on rice cv. PS-5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–384 · show in text ↑
e2

“P. chlamydosporia or A. niger through root-dip (RD) plus one soil application (SA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1083 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The biocontrol treatments reduced M. graminicola egg mass production by 21-29%.

Treatment
These treatmentse0
Interactor
M. graminicolaMeloidogyne graminicolae0pathogen
Outcome
egg mass productione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
21-29%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These treatments significantly reduced galling (22-25%), egg mass production (21-29%) and reproduction factor (63-70%) of M. graminicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1467 · show in text ↑
e1

“on rice cv. PS-5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–384 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The biocontrol treatments reduced M. graminicola reproduction factor by 63-70%.

Treatment
These treatmentse0
Interactor
M. graminicolaMeloidogyne graminicolae0pathogen
Outcome
reproduction factore0
Direction
reducede0
Value
63-70%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These treatments significantly reduced galling (22-25%), egg mass production (21-29%) and reproduction factor (63-70%) of M. graminicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1467 · show in text ↑
e1

“on rice cv. PS-5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–384 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The biocontrol treatments increased rice grain yield by 11-21%.

Treatment
treatmentse3
Interactor
M. graminicolaMeloidogyne graminicolae2pathogen
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
11-21%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and subsequently increased the grain yield (11-21%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1469–1520 · show in text ↑
e1

“on rice cv. PS-5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–384 · show in text ↑
e2

“effectiveness of BCAs against M. graminicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1593–1637 · show in text ↑
e3

“These treatments significantly reduced galling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1377 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application methods enhanced biocontrol agent effectiveness against M. graminicola.

Interactor
M. graminicolaMeloidogyne graminicolae0pathogen
Outcome
effectiveness of BCAs against M. graminicolae0
Direction
enhancede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application methods enhanced the effectiveness of BCAs against M. graminicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1560–1637 · show in text ↑
e1

“on rice cv. PS-5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–384 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that root-dip plus one soil application at 15 DAP was the most effective rice root-knot control treatment.

Interactor
M. graminicolaMeloidogyne graminicolae1pathogen
Outcome
RD plus one SA at 15 DAP proved to be most effective treatment to control root-knot diseasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The RD plus one SA at 15 DAP proved to be most effective treatment to control root-knot disease in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1639–1742 · show in text ↑
e1

“effectiveness of BCAs against M. graminicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1593–1637 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest farmers adopt the combined root-dip and soil-application module for rice nematode control.

Interactor
M. graminicolaMeloidogyne graminicolae2pathogen
Outcome
farmers may adopt the above modulee0
Value
11-21%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“farmers may adopt the above module that may lead to 11-21% yield improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1890–1966 · show in text ↑
e1

“chemical control in rice paddies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1856–1888 · show in text ↑
e2

“effectiveness of BCAs against M. graminicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1593–1637 · show in text ↑

Pseudomonas fluorescens · Meloidogyne graminicola · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.