Paper · 2022 · Proceedings of the Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences

COPPER CONTENT IN ROOTS AND SHOOTS OF CEREALS UNDERDIFFERENT TYPES OF SALYCILIC ACID TREATMENT

Наталья Мстиславовна Казнина; Анна Анатольевна Игнатенко; Юлия Валерьевна Батова; et al.

7
claims
17
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Copper is involved in a number of metabolic reactions that ensure the vital activity of plants; therefore, its deficiency leads to disruption of physiological processes and a decrease of its productivity. In order to increase the contentof cupper in plants, a searching for ways to provide better absorption of copper by roots and enhance its transport to aboveground organs.The use of growth regulators for these purposes, including salicylic acid (SA), seems to be very promising.In this work, we studied the effect of two types of SA treatment (presowingseeds treatment and spraying of plants) on the copper content in the roots and shoots of barley and wheat under optimal conditions of mineral nutrition or under deficiency of this micronutrient in the substrate.The copper content in plants and substrate was determined by the ICP-MS method using a induced plasma mass spectrometer. To assess the intensity of copper influx into plants, the copper biological uptake coefficient was calculated; the intensity of metal ions transport into the shoots was judged on the translocation coefficient. It was found that spraying of plants with SA practically does not affect the amount of copper in the roots and shoots of cereals. In contrast, presowing seed SA treatment contributed to an increase in its content in plants, which was ensure by a more intensive uptake ions by roots, as well as a decrease in the activity of the root barrier and an increase in copper translocation into shoots. It is also important to note that these effects were more pronounced under copper deficiency in the substrate.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salicylic acid spraying practically did not affect root copper content.

Treatment
spraying of plants with SAe0
Outcome
amount of copper in the rootse0
Direction
does not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spraying of plants with SA practically does not affect the amount of copper in the roots and shoots of cereals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1227 · show in text ↑
e1

“roots and shoots of barley and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–662 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salicylic acid spraying practically did not affect shoot copper content.

Treatment
spraying of plants with SAe0
Outcome
amount of copper in the roots and shootse0
Direction
does not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spraying of plants with SA practically does not affect the amount of copper in the roots and shoots of cereals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1227 · show in text ↑
e1

“roots and shoots of barley and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–662 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Presowing seed SA treatment increased copper content in plants.

Treatment
presowing seed SA treatmente0
Outcome
content in plantse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“presowing seed SA treatment contributed to an increase in its content in plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1321 · show in text ↑
e1

“roots and shoots of barley and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–662 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Presowing seed SA treatment intensified ion uptake by roots.

Treatment
presowing seed SA treatmente2
Outcome
uptake ions by rootse0
Qualifier
more intensivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which was ensure by a more intensive uptake ions by roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1380 · show in text ↑
e1

“roots and shoots of barley and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–662 · show in text ↑
e2

“presowing seed SA treatment contributed to an increase in its content in plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1321 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Presowing seed SA treatment decreased root barrier activity.

Treatment
presowing seed SA treatmente2
Outcome
activity of the root barriere0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a decrease in the activity of the root barrier”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1439 · show in text ↑
e1

“roots and shoots of barley and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–662 · show in text ↑
e2

“presowing seed SA treatment contributed to an increase in its content in plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1321 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Presowing seed SA treatment increased copper translocation into shoots.

Treatment
presowing seed SA treatmente2
Outcome
copper translocation into shootse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increase in copper translocation into shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1491 · show in text ↑
e1

“roots and shoots of barley and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–662 · show in text ↑
e2

“presowing seed SA treatment contributed to an increase in its content in plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1321 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

These effects were more pronounced under copper deficient substrate conditions.

Outcome
these effectse0
Direction
more pronouncede0
Setting
copper deficiency in the substratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these effects were more pronounced under copper deficiency in the substrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1527–1602 · show in text ↑
e1

“roots and shoots of barley and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–662 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · nutrient: content · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

salicylic acid · molecular: metabolites · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

salicylic acid · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

salicylic acid · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 34 positive, 1 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 21 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

275 papers: 257 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

271 papers more in this group

See all 275 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.