Paper · 2006 · Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)

Effect of salicylic acid applied through rooting medium on drought tolerance of wheat

Muhammad Waseem; Habib‐ur‐Rehman Athar; Muhammad Ashraf

12
claims
28
verbatim quotes
100
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to assess whether exogenously applied SA through the rooting medium could mitigate the adverse effects of water stress on plant growth, photosynthesis and nutrient status of two wheat genotypes. For this purpose, salicylic acid @ 0, 5, and 10 mg L-1 was applied through the rooting medium to plants of two wheat lines growing in plastic beakers (250 mL) filled with Hoagland's nutrient solution containing 0 or 19 % PEG8000 to represent two water regimes of control (0 MPa) and-0.6 MPa respectively. Different levels of SA applied through the rooting medium increased photosynthetic rate in both cultivars under non-stress conditions but only in S-24 under water stress conditions. Exogenous application of 5 or 10 mg L-1 SA caused an increase in stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, and sub-stomatal of water stressed plants of cv. S-24 whereas it was true for droughted plants of MH-97 only when 5 mg L-1 SA applied. Cultivar S-24 was generally higher in N and P contents of shoot and root than that in genotype MH-97 under both normal and water stress conditions. A decrease in shoot and root N contents of both genotypes and shoot and root P contents of genotype S-24 only was observed in stressed plants when 5 mg L-1 of SA was applied through the rooting medium, whereas the same was true for root P and shoot Ca2+ contents in the non-stressed plants of both cultivars. Application of salicylic acid through the rooting medium significantly reduced the root K+ of two cultivars under both normal and water deficit conditions. Although, exogenously applied SA through the rooting medium had growth promoting effects under non-stress conditions, it did not mitigate the adverse effects of drought stress on growth of both cultivars, though genotype MH-97 showed some recovery under water stress conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salicylic acid applied through the rooting medium increased photosynthetic rate in both cultivars under non-stress conditions.

Treatment
SA applied through the rooting mediume1
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
under non-stress conditionse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“drought tolerance of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“Different levels of SA applied through the rooting medium increased photosynthetic rate in both cultivars under non-stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salicylic acid applied through the rooting medium increased photosynthetic rate only in S-24 under water stress conditions.

Material
S-24e2
Treatment
SA applied through the rooting mediume1
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
under water stress conditionse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“drought tolerance of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“Different levels of SA applied through the rooting medium increased photosynthetic rate in both cultivars under non-stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–661 · show in text ↑
e2

“but only in S-24 under water stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–708 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exogenous application of 5 or 10 mg L-1 SA increased stomatal conductance, transpiration rate and sub-stomatal conductance of water-stressed cv. S-24 plants.

Material
cv. S-24e3
Treatment
Exogenous application of 5 or 10 mg L-1 SAe3
Outcome
stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, and sub-stomatale3
Direction
increasee3
Qualifier
water stressed plantse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“drought tolerance of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–85 · show in text ↑
e3

“Exogenous application of 5 or 10 mg L-1 SA caused an increase in stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, and sub-stomatal of water stressed plants of cv. S-24”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–870 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In droughted MH-97 plants, 5 mg L-1 SA increased stomatal conductance, transpiration rate and sub-stomatal conductance, but only at that concentration.

Material
MH-97e4
Treatment
5 mg L-1 SA appliede4
Outcome
stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, and sub-stomatale3
Direction
increasee3
Qualifier
droughted plantse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“drought tolerance of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–85 · show in text ↑
e3

“Exogenous application of 5 or 10 mg L-1 SA caused an increase in stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, and sub-stomatal of water stressed plants of cv. S-24”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–870 · show in text ↑
e4

“whereas it was true for droughted plants of MH-97 only when 5 mg L-1 SA applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–950 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar S-24 had generally higher shoot and root N and P contents than genotype MH-97 under both normal and water stress conditions.

Material
S-24e5
Organ / stage
shoot and roote5
Outcome
N and P contents of shoot and roote5
Direction
highere5
Qualifier
under both normal and water stress conditionse5
Comparator
genotype MH-97e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“drought tolerance of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–85 · show in text ↑
e5

“Cultivar S-24 was generally higher in N and P contents of shoot and root than that in genotype MH-97 under both normal and water stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1098 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under stress with 5 mg L-1 SA, shoot and root N contents of both genotypes decreased.

Material
both genotypese6
Treatment
5 mg L-1 of SA was applied through the rooting mediume6
Outcome
shoot and root N contentse6
Direction
decreasee6
Qualifier
in stressed plantse6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“drought tolerance of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–85 · show in text ↑
e6

“A decrease in shoot and root N contents of both genotypes and shoot and root P contents of genotype S-24 only was observed in stressed plants when 5 mg L-1 of SA was applied through the rooting medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1300 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under stress with 5 mg L-1 SA, shoot and root P contents of genotype S-24 only decreased.

Material
genotype S-24e6
Treatment
5 mg L-1 of SA was applied through the rooting mediume6
Outcome
shoot and root P contentse6
Direction
decreasee6
Qualifier
in stressed plantse6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“drought tolerance of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–85 · show in text ↑
e6

“A decrease in shoot and root N contents of both genotypes and shoot and root P contents of genotype S-24 only was observed in stressed plants when 5 mg L-1 of SA was applied through the rooting medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1300 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under non-stress conditions with 5 mg L-1 SA, root P and shoot Ca2+ contents of both cultivars decreased.

Material
both cultivarse7
Treatment
5 mg L-1 of SA was applied through the rooting mediume6
Outcome
root P and shoot Ca2+ contentse7
Direction
decreasee6
Qualifier
in the non-stressed plantse7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“drought tolerance of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–85 · show in text ↑
e6

“A decrease in shoot and root N contents of both genotypes and shoot and root P contents of genotype S-24 only was observed in stressed plants when 5 mg L-1 of SA was applied through the rooting medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1300 · show in text ↑
e7

“whereas the same was true for root P and shoot Ca2+ contents in the non-stressed plants of both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1407 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salicylic acid applied through the rooting medium significantly reduced root K+ of two cultivars under both normal and water deficit conditions.

Material
two cultivarse1
Treatment
Application of salicylic acid through the rooting mediume1
Outcome
root K+e1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
under both normal and water deficit conditionse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“drought tolerance of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of salicylic acid through the rooting medium significantly reduced the root K+ of two cultivars under both normal and water deficit conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1409–1563 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exogenously applied salicylic acid through the rooting medium promoted growth under non-stress conditions.

Treatment
exogenously applied SA through the rooting mediume1
Outcome
growthe1
Direction
promotinge1
Qualifier
under non-stress conditionse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“drought tolerance of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“Although, exogenously applied SA through the rooting medium had growth promoting effects under non-stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1565–1681 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salicylic acid applied through the rooting medium did not mitigate the adverse effects of drought stress on growth of both cultivars.

Material
both cultivarse2
Treatment
exogenously applied SA through the rooting mediume1
Outcome
adverse effects of drought stress on growthe2
Direction
did not mitigatee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“drought tolerance of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“Although, exogenously applied SA through the rooting medium had growth promoting effects under non-stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1565–1681 · show in text ↑
e2

“it did not mitigate the adverse effects of drought stress on growth of both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1683–1768 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype MH-97 showed some recovery under water stress conditions.

Material
genotype MH-97e1
Outcome
recoverye1
Qualifier
under water stress conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“drought tolerance of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“though genotype MH-97 showed some recovery under water stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1770–1842 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · physiology: gas exchange · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

salicylic acid · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

39 papers: 38 positive, 1 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

salicylic acid · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

104 papers: 95 positive, 9 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

100 papers more in this group

See all 104 papers →

salicylic acid · physiology: ion balance · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

salicylic acid · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

in vitro · physiology: ion balance · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

in vitro · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

in vitro · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 12 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.