Abstract
A field trail was conducted at Cental Research Farm, SHUATS, Naini, Prayagraj, U.P. during kharif season of 2021 in Randomised Block Design with eight treatments were evaluated against, Spodoptera frugiperda i.e., Spinetoram 11.7%SC @0.9ml/lit, Chlorantraniliprole 18.5%SC @0.4ml/lit, Flubendiamide 39.35%SC @0.24ml/lit, Emamectin benzoate 5%SG @0.4g/lit, Neem oil 2% @5mi/lit, NPV @0.5ml/lit, Novaluron 10%EC @1ml/lit and control plot. First and second spray were carried with 15 days interval, the results revealed that, among the different treatments Spinetoram 11.7%SC, (4.93) was most effective treatment over the control followed by Chlorantraniliprole 18.5%SC (6.24), Flubendiamide 39.35% SC (6.42), Emamectin benzoate 5%SG (6.90), Novaluron 10%EC (8.13), NPV (8.28) and Neem oil 2% (8.37). Spinetoram 11.7%SC showing a highest yield of (41.10q/ha) against the control yielding up to (22.31q/ha) at the same time among the treatments studied, the best and most economical treatment was Spinetoram 11.7%SC (1:1.79), followed by Chlorantraniliprole 18.5%SC (1:1.78), Flubendiamide 39.35%SC (1:1.77), Emamectin benzoate 5%SG (1:1.74), Novaluron 10%EC (1:1.68), NPV (1:1.60) and Neem oil 2% (1:1.44) when compared to control plot (1:1.25).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
Spinetoram 11.7%SC was the most effective treatment against Spodoptera frugiperda compared with the control.
- Treatment
- Spinetoram 11.7%SCe1
- Interactor
- Spodoptera frugiperda
.jpg?width=60)
Spodoptera frugiperdat0pest - Outcome
- most effective treatmente1
- Direction
- most effectivee1
- Value
- 4.93e1
- Comparator
- controle1
Zea maysOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“against Fall Army Worm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) on Maize (Zea mays L.)”
e1“Spinetoram 11.7%SC, (4.93) was most effective treatment over the control followed by Chlorantraniliprole 18.5%SC (6.24), Flubendiamide 39.35% SC (6.42), Emamectin benzoate 5%SG (6.90), Novaluron 10%EC (8.13), NPV (8.28) and Neem oil 2% (8.37)”
Claim · model-written summary
Spinetoram 11.7%SC gave the highest yield, 41.10 q/ha, against the control yielding up to 22.31 q/ha.
- Treatment
- Spinetoram 11.7%SCe2
- Outcome
- yielde2
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 41.10q/hae2
- Qualifier
- yielding up to (22.31q/ha)e2
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“against Fall Army Worm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) on Maize (Zea mays L.)”
e2“Spinetoram 11.7%SC showing a highest yield of (41.10q/ha) against the control yielding up to (22.31q/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
Spinetoram 11.7%SC was the best and most economical treatment, with a benefit-cost ratio of 1:1.79.
- Treatment
- Spinetoram 11.7%SCe3
- Outcome
- most economical treatmente3
- Direction
- beste3
- Value
- 1:1.79e3
- Qualifier
- 1:1.25e3
- Comparator
- control plote3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“against Fall Army Worm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) on Maize (Zea mays L.)”
e3“the best and most economical treatment was Spinetoram 11.7%SC (1:1.79), followed by Chlorantraniliprole 18.5%SC (1:1.78), Flubendiamide 39.35%SC (1:1.77), Emamectin benzoate 5%SG (1:1.74), Novaluron 10%EC (1:1.68), NPV (1:1.60) and Neem oil 2% (1:1.44) when compared to control plot (1:1.25)”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorantraniliprole 18.5%SC followed spinetoram in effectiveness against Spodoptera frugiperda (score 6.24).
- Treatment
- Chlorantraniliprole 18.5%SCe1
- Interactor
- Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdat0pest
- Outcome
- effectivee1
- Direction
- followed bye1
- Value
- 6.24e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“against Fall Army Worm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) on Maize (Zea mays L.)”
e1“Spinetoram 11.7%SC, (4.93) was most effective treatment over the control followed by Chlorantraniliprole 18.5%SC (6.24), Flubendiamide 39.35% SC (6.42), Emamectin benzoate 5%SG (6.90), Novaluron 10%EC (8.13), NPV (8.28) and Neem oil 2% (8.37)”
Claim · model-written summary
Flubendiamide 39.35% SC followed in effectiveness against Spodoptera frugiperda (score 6.42).
- Treatment
- Flubendiamide 39.35% SCe1
- Interactor
- Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdat0pest
- Outcome
- effectivee1
- Direction
- followed bye1
- Value
- 6.42e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“against Fall Army Worm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) on Maize (Zea mays L.)”
e1“Spinetoram 11.7%SC, (4.93) was most effective treatment over the control followed by Chlorantraniliprole 18.5%SC (6.24), Flubendiamide 39.35% SC (6.42), Emamectin benzoate 5%SG (6.90), Novaluron 10%EC (8.13), NPV (8.28) and Neem oil 2% (8.37)”
Claim · model-written summary
Emamectin benzoate 5%SG followed in effectiveness against Spodoptera frugiperda (score 6.90).
- Treatment
- Emamectin benzoate 5%SGe1
- Interactor
- Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdat0pest
- Outcome
- effectivee1
- Direction
- followed bye1
- Value
- 6.90e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“against Fall Army Worm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) on Maize (Zea mays L.)”
e1“Spinetoram 11.7%SC, (4.93) was most effective treatment over the control followed by Chlorantraniliprole 18.5%SC (6.24), Flubendiamide 39.35% SC (6.42), Emamectin benzoate 5%SG (6.90), Novaluron 10%EC (8.13), NPV (8.28) and Neem oil 2% (8.37)”
Claim · model-written summary
Novaluron 10%EC followed in effectiveness against Spodoptera frugiperda (score 8.13).
- Treatment
- Novaluron 10%ECe1
- Interactor
- Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdat0pest
- Outcome
- effectivee1
- Direction
- followed bye1
- Value
- 8.13e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“against Fall Army Worm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) on Maize (Zea mays L.)”
e1“Spinetoram 11.7%SC, (4.93) was most effective treatment over the control followed by Chlorantraniliprole 18.5%SC (6.24), Flubendiamide 39.35% SC (6.42), Emamectin benzoate 5%SG (6.90), Novaluron 10%EC (8.13), NPV (8.28) and Neem oil 2% (8.37)”
Claim · model-written summary
NPV followed in effectiveness against Spodoptera frugiperda (score 8.28).
- Treatment
- NPVe1
- Interactor
- Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdat0pest
- Outcome
- effectivee1
- Direction
- followed bye1
- Value
- 8.28e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“against Fall Army Worm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) on Maize (Zea mays L.)”
e1“Spinetoram 11.7%SC, (4.93) was most effective treatment over the control followed by Chlorantraniliprole 18.5%SC (6.24), Flubendiamide 39.35% SC (6.42), Emamectin benzoate 5%SG (6.90), Novaluron 10%EC (8.13), NPV (8.28) and Neem oil 2% (8.37)”
Claim · model-written summary
Neem oil 2% followed in effectiveness against Spodoptera frugiperda (score 8.37).
- Treatment
- Neem oil 2%e1
- Interactor
- Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdat0pest
- Outcome
- effectivee1
- Direction
- followed bye1
- Value
- 8.37e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“against Fall Army Worm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) on Maize (Zea mays L.)”
e1“Spinetoram 11.7%SC, (4.93) was most effective treatment over the control followed by Chlorantraniliprole 18.5%SC (6.24), Flubendiamide 39.35% SC (6.42), Emamectin benzoate 5%SG (6.90), Novaluron 10%EC (8.13), NPV (8.28) and Neem oil 2% (8.37)”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorantraniliprole 18.5%SC had a benefit-cost ratio of 1:1.78.
- Treatment
- Chlorantraniliprole 18.5%SCe3
- Outcome
- most economicale3
- Direction
- followed bye3
- Value
- 1:1.78e3
- Comparator
- control plote3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“against Fall Army Worm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) on Maize (Zea mays L.)”
e3“the best and most economical treatment was Spinetoram 11.7%SC (1:1.79), followed by Chlorantraniliprole 18.5%SC (1:1.78), Flubendiamide 39.35%SC (1:1.77), Emamectin benzoate 5%SG (1:1.74), Novaluron 10%EC (1:1.68), NPV (1:1.60) and Neem oil 2% (1:1.44) when compared to control plot (1:1.25)”
Claim · model-written summary
Flubendiamide 39.35%SC had a benefit-cost ratio of 1:1.77.
- Treatment
- Flubendiamide 39.35%SCe3
- Outcome
- most economicale3
- Direction
- followed bye3
- Value
- 1:1.77e3
- Comparator
- control plote3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“against Fall Army Worm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) on Maize (Zea mays L.)”
e3“the best and most economical treatment was Spinetoram 11.7%SC (1:1.79), followed by Chlorantraniliprole 18.5%SC (1:1.78), Flubendiamide 39.35%SC (1:1.77), Emamectin benzoate 5%SG (1:1.74), Novaluron 10%EC (1:1.68), NPV (1:1.60) and Neem oil 2% (1:1.44) when compared to control plot (1:1.25)”
Claim · model-written summary
Emamectin benzoate 5%SG had a benefit-cost ratio of 1:1.74.
- Treatment
- Emamectin benzoate 5%SGe3
- Outcome
- most economicale3
- Direction
- followed bye3
- Value
- 1:1.74e3
- Comparator
- control plote3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“against Fall Army Worm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) on Maize (Zea mays L.)”
e3“the best and most economical treatment was Spinetoram 11.7%SC (1:1.79), followed by Chlorantraniliprole 18.5%SC (1:1.78), Flubendiamide 39.35%SC (1:1.77), Emamectin benzoate 5%SG (1:1.74), Novaluron 10%EC (1:1.68), NPV (1:1.60) and Neem oil 2% (1:1.44) when compared to control plot (1:1.25)”
Claim · model-written summary
Novaluron 10%EC had a benefit-cost ratio of 1:1.68.
- Treatment
- Novaluron 10%ECe3
- Outcome
- most economicale3
- Direction
- followed bye3
- Value
- 1:1.68e3
- Comparator
- control plote3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“against Fall Army Worm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) on Maize (Zea mays L.)”
e3“the best and most economical treatment was Spinetoram 11.7%SC (1:1.79), followed by Chlorantraniliprole 18.5%SC (1:1.78), Flubendiamide 39.35%SC (1:1.77), Emamectin benzoate 5%SG (1:1.74), Novaluron 10%EC (1:1.68), NPV (1:1.60) and Neem oil 2% (1:1.44) when compared to control plot (1:1.25)”
Claim · model-written summary
NPV had a benefit-cost ratio of 1:1.60.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“against Fall Army Worm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) on Maize (Zea mays L.)”
e3“the best and most economical treatment was Spinetoram 11.7%SC (1:1.79), followed by Chlorantraniliprole 18.5%SC (1:1.78), Flubendiamide 39.35%SC (1:1.77), Emamectin benzoate 5%SG (1:1.74), Novaluron 10%EC (1:1.68), NPV (1:1.60) and Neem oil 2% (1:1.44) when compared to control plot (1:1.25)”
Claim · model-written summary
Neem oil 2% had a benefit-cost ratio of 1:1.44.
- Treatment
- Neem oil 2%e3
- Outcome
- most economicale3
- Direction
- followed bye3
- Value
- 1:1.44e3
- Comparator
- control plote3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“against Fall Army Worm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) on Maize (Zea mays L.)”
e3“the best and most economical treatment was Spinetoram 11.7%SC (1:1.79), followed by Chlorantraniliprole 18.5%SC (1:1.78), Flubendiamide 39.35%SC (1:1.77), Emamectin benzoate 5%SG (1:1.74), Novaluron 10%EC (1:1.68), NPV (1:1.60) and Neem oil 2% (1:1.44) when compared to control plot (1:1.25)”
The same questions in other papers
emamectin benzoate · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
27 papers more in this group
See all 31 papers →chlorantraniliprole · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
44 papers more in this group
See all 48 papers →novaluron · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →flubendiamide · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Spinetoram · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
11 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →Spinetoram · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
27 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
24 papers more in this group
See all 28 papers →botanical · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
49 papers more in this group
See all 53 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.