Paper · 2023 · Acta Agrobotanica

Toxic effects of the crude methanolic extract of Austroplenckia populnea leaves and fractions on the growth of Spodoptera frugiperda

Walter Pires Junior; Lauanny Eloá Silva Arin Silva Arin; Antônio Carlos Severo Menezes; et al.

5
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The aim of the current study is to assess the toxicity of Austroplenckia populnea leaf extracts towards the Spodoptera frugiperda population in laboratory conditions. Initially, a crude methanolic extract was obtained from dried leaves of A. populnea. This extract was fractionated using hexane, ethyl acetate, and then methanol. Neonate S. frugiperda larvae were isolated in plastic containers and fed (once) on corn leaf fragments treated with crude and fractions of the investigated plant extracts. The life cycle of the larvae treated with the extracts was monitored. In addition to the intake of leaves treated with the plant extracts, such variables as larval and pupal mortality rate, larval and pupal weight, and larval, pupal, and adult stage duration were evaluated. The crude, hexane, and methanol extract fractions exerted an antixenosis effect on the feeding behaviour of neonate S. frugiperda larvae. A significant antibiosis effect was observed for the hexane fraction of the A. populnea extract, since all of its concentrations promoted a S. frugiperda larval mortality rate differing from that observed for the control. The pupal mortality rate was low, but it did not differ significantly from the mortality rate observed for the control treatment, which was nil. The larvicidal effect of the A. populnea leaf extract, mainly of its hexane fraction, has indicated its potential to be used in integrated S. frugiperda management programs.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude extract deterred neonate larval feeding.

Treatment
crudee0
Interactor
S. frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdae0pest
Outcome
feeding behaviour of neonate S. frugiperda larvaee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The crude, hexane, and methanol extract fractions exerted an antixenosis effect on the feeding behaviour of neonate S. frugiperda larvae.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–914 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn leaf fragments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–432 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hexane fraction deterred neonate larval feeding.

Treatment
hexanee0
Interactor
S. frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdae0pest
Outcome
feeding behaviour of neonate S. frugiperda larvaee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The crude, hexane, and methanol extract fractions exerted an antixenosis effect on the feeding behaviour of neonate S. frugiperda larvae.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–914 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn leaf fragments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–432 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methanol fraction deterred neonate larval feeding.

Treatment
methanole0
Interactor
S. frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdae0pest
Outcome
feeding behaviour of neonate S. frugiperda larvaee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The crude, hexane, and methanol extract fractions exerted an antixenosis effect on the feeding behaviour of neonate S. frugiperda larvae.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–914 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn leaf fragments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–432 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All concentrations of hexane fraction changed larval mortality relative to control.

Treatment
hexane fractiont1
Interactor
S. frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdae0pest
Outcome
S. frugiperda larval mortality ratee0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all of its concentrations promoted a S. frugiperda larval mortality rate differing from that observed for the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1136 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn leaf fragments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–432 · show in text ↑
t1

“hexane fraction of the A. populnea extract”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1010 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pupal mortality did not differ significantly from the nil control.

Treatment
plant extractst1
Interactor
S. frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdae1pest
Outcome
pupal mortality ratee0
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pupal mortality rate was low, but it did not differ significantly from the mortality rate observed for the control treatment, which was nil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1281 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn leaf fragments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–432 · show in text ↑
t1

“intake of leaves treated with the plant extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–639 · show in text ↑
e1

“Neonate S. frugiperda larvae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–358 · show in text ↑

methanol · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

hexane · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 49 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.