Paper · 2022 · PLANT ARCHIVES

RESPONSE OF PEARLMILLET CULTIVARS TO DIFFERENT MOISTURE CONSERVATION PRACTICES UNDER RAINFED CONDITION ON LIGHT TEXTURED SOIL OF CENTRAL UTTAR PRADESH, INDIA

P.K. Rajput; Yogesh Kumar; A.K. Katiyar; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during kharif seasons of 2018 and 2019 at Soil Conservation and Water Management Farm of C.S. Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur, to study the performance of pearlmillet cultivars under varying moisture conservation practices in terms of production, total water use, water use efficiency and root development under rainfed condition. Results revealed that among cultivars, 'Krishna-834' considered to be the most promising in terms of yield, WUE, root development, net return and B:C ratio. One weeding and hoeing + organic residue mulch @ 4 t ha-1 on soil surface at 25 DAS brought out significantly higher production as compared to ridging and furrowing as well as one weeding and hoeing practices. The roots plant-1 , dry weight of roots plant-1, soil moisture status, WUE and net return were also the highest, where mulching practice was taken as moisture conservation practice.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Krishna-834 was most promising for yield, water use efficiency, root development and financial returns.

Taxon
PEARLMILLETCenchrus americanust0
Material
Krishna-834e0
Outcome
yield, WUE, root developmente0
Qualifier
net return and B:C ratioe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“'Krishna-834' considered to be the most promising in terms of yield, WUE, root development, net return and B:C ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–541 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEARLMILLET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weeding, hoeing and residue mulch at 25 DAS gave significantly higher production than ridging and furrowing.

Taxon
PEARLMILLETCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
One weeding and hoeing + organic residue mulch @ 4 t ha-1 on soil surface at 25 DASe0
Outcome
productione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
ridging and furrowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“One weeding and hoeing + organic residue mulch @ 4 t ha-1 on soil surface at 25 DAS brought out significantly higher production as compared to ridging and furrowing as well as one weeding and hoeing practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–751 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEARLMILLET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weeding, hoeing and residue mulch at 25 DAS gave significantly higher production than weeding and hoeing alone.

Taxon
PEARLMILLETCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
One weeding and hoeing + organic residue mulch @ 4 t ha-1 on soil surface at 25 DASe0
Outcome
productione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
one weeding and hoeing practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“One weeding and hoeing + organic residue mulch @ 4 t ha-1 on soil surface at 25 DAS brought out significantly higher production as compared to ridging and furrowing as well as one weeding and hoeing practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–751 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEARLMILLET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching gave the highest roots per plant and root dry weight.

Taxon
PEARLMILLETCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
mulching practicee0
Outcome
roots plant-1 , dry weight of roots plant-1e0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The roots plant-1 , dry weight of roots plant-1, soil moisture status, WUE and net return were also the highest, where mulching practice was taken as moisture conservation practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEARLMILLET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching gave the highest soil moisture status and water use efficiency.

Taxon
PEARLMILLETCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
mulching practicee0
Outcome
soil moisture status, WUEe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The roots plant-1 , dry weight of roots plant-1, soil moisture status, WUE and net return were also the highest, where mulching practice was taken as moisture conservation practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEARLMILLET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching gave the highest net return.

Taxon
PEARLMILLETCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
mulching practicee0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The roots plant-1 , dry weight of roots plant-1, soil moisture status, WUE and net return were also the highest, where mulching practice was taken as moisture conservation practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEARLMILLET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–23 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results differ

19 papers: 17 positive, 2 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

herbicide · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 34 positive, 5 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

mulching · growth · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mulching · physiology: water · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.