Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

i Impact of cropping system, fertility level and moisture-conservation practice on i productivity, nutrient uptake, water use and profitability of pearlmillet (Pennisetum glaucum) under rainfed conditions

J.P. TETARWAL AN K.S. RANA

4
claims
6
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted on a sandy loam soil at Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi during rainy (kharif) season of 2003 and 2004. The treatment combinations comprised two cropping systems [pearlmillet sole (50 cm row spacing) and pearlmillet paired row (30170 cm row spacing) + one row of mothbean] and three fertility levels (control, 40 kg N + 20 kg P20gha and 80 kg N + 40 kg P20,/ha) in main plots; and four moisture-conservation practices (no mulch, dust mulch + straw mulch, kaolin + straw mulch and farmyard ma- nure (FYM) Q 5 tlha + dust mulch + straw mulch) in subplots. Split-plot design was followed with three replica- tions. The planting of one row of mothbean between paired rows of pearlmillet proved superior to sole pearlmillet in respect of pearlmillet-equivalent.yield (29.60 qlha), water use and economics. Application of 80 kg N + 40 kg P,OJha as also FYM Q 5 tlha + dust mulch + straw mulch recorded significantly higher pearlmillet- equivalent yield, nutrient uptake, water use and economics compared with the rest of the treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mothbean between paired pearlmillet rows gave superior pearlmillet-equivalent yield of 29.60 qlha.

Taxon
pearlmilletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
planting of one row of mothbean between paired rows of pearlmillete0
Interactor
mothbeanVigna aconitifoliae0other
Outcome
pearlmillet-equivalent.yielde0
Direction
superiore0
Value
29.60 qlhae0
Comparator
sole pearlmillete0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna aconitifolia
Vigna aconitifolia · InteractorLalitstar at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The planting of one row of mothbean between paired rows of pearlmillet proved superior to sole pearlmillet in respect of pearlmillet-equivalent.yield (29.60 qlha), water use and economics.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–850 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mothbean intercropping was superior for water use and economics.

Taxon
pearlmilletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
planting of one row of mothbean between paired rows of pearlmillete0
Interactor
mothbeanVigna aconitifoliae0other
Outcome
water use and economicse0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
sole pearlmillete0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna aconitifolia
Vigna aconitifolia · InteractorLalitstar at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The planting of one row of mothbean between paired rows of pearlmillet proved superior to sole pearlmillet in respect of pearlmillet-equivalent.yield (29.60 qlha), water use and economics.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–850 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest stated fertilizer level gave significantly higher yield, nutrient uptake, water use and economics.

Taxon
pearlmilletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
80 kg N + 40 kg P,OJhae0
Outcome
pearlmillet- equivalent yield, nutrient uptake, water use and economicse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
the rest of the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 80 kg N + 40 kg P,OJha as also FYM Q 5 tlha + dust mulch + straw mulch recorded significantly higher pearlmillet- equivalent yield, nutrient uptake, water use and economics compared with the rest of the treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1080 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearlmillet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 147–158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM plus dust and straw mulch gave significantly higher yield, nutrient uptake, water use and economics.

Taxon
pearlmilletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
FYM Q 5 tlha + dust mulch + straw mulche0
Outcome
pearlmillet- equivalent yield, nutrient uptake, water use and economicse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
the rest of the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 80 kg N + 40 kg P,OJha as also FYM Q 5 tlha + dust mulch + straw mulch recorded significantly higher pearlmillet- equivalent yield, nutrient uptake, water use and economics compared with the rest of the treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1080 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearlmillet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 147–158 · show in text ↑

Vigna aconitifolia · physiology: water · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Vigna aconitifolia · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · physiology: water · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results differ

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: water · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

mulching · physiology: water · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

organic · physiology: water · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.