Abstract
Percent of bud fertility, growth and fruiting of Thompson Seedless grapevines in response to foliar application with GAl, urea and potassium sulphate were studied during 2001 and 2002 seasons. Results showed that bud fertility % was minimized in vines when sprayed with GAJ and/or urea, while maximized in vines sprayed with potassium sulphate. Growth parameters were greaUy promoted by GAJ, urea and potassium sulphate together. Wood ripening was maximized in vines sprayed with potassium sulphate. Yet, this treatments had no considerable effect on number of clusters/vine, while obviously Improved the yield (kg) compared with the control. Weight and dimensions of cluster and berry were positively affected by foliar application of GA), urea and potassium sulphate. Application with GAJ and potassium sulphate were responsible for obtaining unfavorable and favorable effects on berry quality. The maximum total carbohydrates was recorded in vines sprayed with potassium sulphate and urea. Thus, spraying Thompson seedless grapevines twice with GAJ, urea and potassium sulphate were considered of promising treatment.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
GAJ and/or urea spray minimized bud fertility in Thompson Seedless grapevines.
VitisNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“bud fertility % was minimized in vines when sprayed with GAJ and/or urea”
t0“GRAPEVINE”
Claim · model-written summary
GAJ spray minimized bud fertility in grapevines.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“bud fertility % was minimized in vines when sprayed with GAJ and/or urea”
t0“GRAPEVINE”
Claim · model-written summary
Potassium sulphate spray maximized grapevine bud fertility.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“bud fertility % was minimized in vines when sprayed with GAJ and/or urea, while maximized in vines sprayed with potassium sulphate”
t0“GRAPEVINE”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined GAJ, urea, and potassium sulphate promoted grapevine growth parameters.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Growth parameters were greaUy promoted by GAJ, urea and potassium sulphate together.”
t0“GRAPEVINE”
Claim · model-written summary
Potassium sulphate spray maximized grapevine wood ripening.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Wood ripening was maximized in vines sprayed with potassium sulphate.”
t0“GRAPEVINE”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment had no considerable effect on grapevine cluster number.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“this treatments had no considerable effect on number of clusters/vine”
t0“GRAPEVINE”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment improved grapevine yield relative to the control.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Yet, this treatments had no considerable effect on number of clusters/vine, while obviously Improved the yield (kg) compared with the control.”
t0“GRAPEVINE”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar GA), urea and potassium sulphate positively affected cluster and berry weight and dimensions.
- Treatment
- foliar application of GA), urea and potassium sulphatee0
- Outcome
- Weight and dimensions of cluster and berrye0
- Direction
- positively affectede0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Weight and dimensions of cluster and berry were positively affected by foliar application of GA), urea and potassium sulphate.”
t0“GRAPEVINE”
Claim · model-written summary
GAJ application had unfavorable effects on grape berry quality.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application with GAJ and potassium sulphate were responsible for obtaining unfavorable and favorable effects on berry quality.”
t0“GRAPEVINE”
Claim · model-written summary
Potassium sulphate application had favorable effects on grape berry quality.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application with GAJ and potassium sulphate were responsible for obtaining unfavorable and favorable effects on berry quality.”
t0“GRAPEVINE”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined potassium sulphate and urea gave the maximum total carbohydrates in grapevines.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum total carbohydrates was recorded in vines sprayed with potassium sulphate and urea.”
t0“GRAPEVINE”
The same questions in other papers
Gibberellic acid · molecular: metabolites · VitisResults differ
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
26 papers more in this group
See all 30 papers →potassium sulfate · growth · VitisPositive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
potassium sulfate · quality: sugar starch · VitisResults agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · VitisPositive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · VitisPositive and negative results
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →nitrogen · growth · VitisPositive and negative results
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →application · molecular: metabolites · VitisPositive and negative results
45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
47 papers more in this group
See all 51 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.