Abstract
Yield response of sugar beet to P rates (30 and 45 kg P2O5 /fed), N rates (60 and 90 kg N/fed) and timing of N application viz., all amount 0f N at sowing, split application in two equal doses, at sowing and at thinning or in three equal doses 1/3 at sowing + 1/3 at thinning + 1/3 one month after thinning. The main results obtained from this study revealed that: - Application of 45 kg P2O5 /fed increased root size, in terms of length and diameter as well as root weight and produced the highest yield of roots, sugar and tops /fed, while juice quality traits (TSS, sucrose and purity %) were not affected by P rates. - Increasing N rate up to 90 kg N/fed improved size and weight of the individual root and increased root yield by 3.4 tons, sugar yield by 460 kg and top yield by 1.41 ton/fed. On the other hand, higher N rate depressed beet quality. - Split application of N in three equal doses improved size and weight of individual root and produced the highest yield of roots, sugar and tops/fed, while juice quality traits, in terms of sucrose and purity % were not affected by timing of N application. - The interaction between P and N rates was significant with respect to root diameter, root weight and root yield/fed. - The interaction between N rates and times of N application was significant with respect to length and weight of the root, TSS and top yield. - The second order interaction had a significant effect on root weight. The highest yields of roots and sugar /fed resulted from 45 kg P2O5 /fed + 90 kg N/fed applied in three equal doses 1/3 at sowing + 1/3 at thinning + 1/3 one month after thinning.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
45 kg P2O5 /fed increased root length, diameter and weight.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEET
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- 45 kg P2O5 /fede0
- Outcome
- root size, in terms of length and diameter as well as root weighte0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of 45 kg P2O5 /fed increased root size, in terms of length and diameter as well as root weight”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
45 kg P2O5 /fed produced the highest root, sugar and top yields.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 45 kg P2O5 /fede0
- Outcome
- yield of roots, sugar and tops /fede0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of 45 kg P2O5 /fed increased root size, in terms of length and diameter as well as root weight and produced the highest yield of roots, sugar and tops /fed”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphorus rates did not affect TSS, sucrose or purity percentage.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- P ratese0
- Outcome
- TSS, sucrose and purity %e0
- Direction
- not affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“juice quality traits (TSS, sucrose and purity %) were not affected by P rates”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing nitrogen to 90 kg N/fed improved individual root size and weight.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- N rate up to 90 kg N/fede0
- Outcome
- size and weight of the individual roote0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Increasing N rate up to 90 kg N/fed improved size and weight of the individual root”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing nitrogen raised root yield by 3.4 tons.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- N rate up to 90 kg N/fede1
- Outcome
- root yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 3.4 tonse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“increased root yield by 3.4 tons”
t0“EFFECT OF PHOSPHORUS AND NITROGEN RATES AND TIME OF NITROGEN APPLICATION ON YIELD AND JUICE QUALITY OF SUGAR BEET”
e1“Increasing N rate up to 90 kg N/fed improved size and weight of the individual root”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing nitrogen raised sugar yield by 460 kg.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- N rate up to 90 kg N/fede1
- Outcome
- sugar yielde0
- Direction
- increaseinferrede0
- Value
- 460 kge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“sugar yield by 460 kg”
t0“EFFECT OF PHOSPHORUS AND NITROGEN RATES AND TIME OF NITROGEN APPLICATION ON YIELD AND JUICE QUALITY OF SUGAR BEET”
e1“Increasing N rate up to 90 kg N/fed improved size and weight of the individual root”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing nitrogen raised top yield by 1.41 ton/fed.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- N rate up to 90 kg N/fede1
- Outcome
- top yielde0
- Direction
- increaseinferrede0
- Value
- 1.41 ton/fede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“top yield by 1.41 ton/fed”
t0“EFFECT OF PHOSPHORUS AND NITROGEN RATES AND TIME OF NITROGEN APPLICATION ON YIELD AND JUICE QUALITY OF SUGAR BEET”
e1“Increasing N rate up to 90 kg N/fed improved size and weight of the individual root”
Claim · model-written summary
Higher nitrogen rate depressed beet quality.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- higher N ratee0
- Outcome
- beet qualitye0
- Direction
- depressede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“higher N rate depressed beet quality”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
Three equal nitrogen doses improved individual root size and weight.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- Split application of N in three equal dosese0
- Outcome
- size and weight of individual roote0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Split application of N in three equal doses improved size and weight of individual root”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
Three equal nitrogen doses yielded the highest roots, sugar and tops per fed.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- N in three equal dosese1
- Outcome
- yield of roots, sugar and tops/fede0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“produced the highest yield of roots, sugar and tops/fed”
t0“EFFECT OF PHOSPHORUS AND NITROGEN RATES AND TIME OF NITROGEN APPLICATION ON YIELD AND JUICE QUALITY OF SUGAR BEET”
e1“Split application of N in three equal doses improved size and weight of individual root”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen timing did not affect sucrose or purity percentage.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- timing of N applicatione0
- Outcome
- sucrose and purity %e0
- Direction
- not affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“sucrose and purity % were not affected by timing of N application”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphorus by nitrogen rate interaction significantly affected root diameter, weight and yield.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- P and N ratese0
- Outcome
- root diameter, root weight and root yield/fede0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“interaction between P and N rates was significant with respect to root diameter, root weight and root yield/fed”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen rate by timing interaction significantly affected root length and weight, TSS and top yield.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- N rates and times of N applicatione0
- Outcome
- length and weight of the root, TSS and top yielde0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“interaction between N rates and times of N application was significant with respect to length and weight of the root, TSS and top yield”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
The second order interaction significantly affected root weight.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- second order interactione0
- Outcome
- root weighte0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“second order interaction had a significant effect on root weight”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest root and sugar yields came from 45 kg P2O5 /fed plus 90 kg N/fed applied in three doses.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 45 kg P2O5 /fed + 90 kg N/fed applied in three equal doses 1/3 at sowing + 1/3 at thinning + 1/3 one month after thinninge0
- Outcome
- yields of roots and sugar /fede0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“highest yields of roots and sugar /fed resulted from 45 kg P2O5 /fed + 90 kg N/fed applied in three equal doses 1/3 at sowing + 1/3 at thinning + 1/3 one month after thinning”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
The same questions in other papers
phosphorus · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ
29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
34 papers more in this group
See all 38 papers →nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ
65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
99 papers more in this group
See all 103 papers →pruning · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →phosphorus · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →phosphorus · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →nitrogen · quality: general · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
62 papers more in this group
See all 66 papers →nitrogen · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
104 papers more in this group
See all 108 papers →8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.