Paper · 2000 · Journal of Plant Production

EVALUATION OF SOME NEW BREAD WHEAT GENOTYPES UNDER DIFFERENT IRRIGATION INTERVALS AND N-FERTILIZATION LEVELS IN SANDY SOILS.

Iman Sadek,

19
claims
44
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two field experiments were conducted at El-Bustan region (EL-Behaira Governorate) in 1998/1999 and 1999/2000 seasons to evaluate three new wheat genotypes of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum, L.) namely; Gemmeiza 5,Sakha 93 and Giza 168 compared to the two commercial cultivars Sakha 69 and Sids 1 in the sandy soils at three different nitrogen rates (72, 144 and 216 kg N/ha) with four sprinkler irrigation treatments viz., irrigation at 7-day intervals throughout the growing season + increasing the intervals from 7 to 14 days only at either of the three stages of crop growth i.e., from planting to booting, from booting to milk stage and from milk stage to maturity. Obtained results indicated that irrigation every seven days through the season resulted in the highest grain yield from all tested genotypes. Elongating the interval of irrigation from 7 to 14 days at any of the three growth stages resulted in significant reductions estimated by 19.6, 13.4 and 9.8%, respectively, indicating that the first stage from planting to booting was the most sensitive period for water stress. Yield components; number of spikes/m², number of kernels/spike and 1000-kernel weight were also depressed by elongating the irrigation intervals with reductions being more at the first stage. Grain yield and yield components of the different genotypes were significantly increased with each successive level of nitrogen application. In addition, differences in grain yield among the tested genotypes were significant. Gemmeiza 5 gave the highest grain yield (5.81 t/ha) but was not significantly different from that produced by Sakha 93. Giza 168 and Sids1 were next to follow whereas, Sakha 69 gave the lowest grain yield (4.61 t/ha).The interactions between the different treatments were significant and the highest yields were produced from cultivars Gemmeiza 5 and Sids 1 irrigated every 7 days throughout the season and fertilized with 216 kgN/ha. In addition, substantial difference among the genotypes in their response to increasing N fertilizer level was observed. Grain yield response index (GYRI) was highest for cultivar Gemmeiza 5 and lowest for Sakha69. Furthermore, GYRI and water-use efficiency(WUE) were highest when the shortest irrigation interval of 7 days was followed at both the first and the second growth stages and were declined with elongating the intervals at either one of them, particularly in the first stage. Likewise, WUE significantly increased with increasing N application. Moreover, significant genotypic variation for WUE was obtained and the highest values were achieved from the high-yielding genotypes. In conclusion, the new cultivars; Gemmeiza 5 followed by Sakha 93 and Giza168 along with the commercial cultivar Sids 1 are highly recommended to be grown in the sandy soil of new reclaimed area of El-Bustan region (El-Behaira Governorate) and for maximum yield, irrigation should be practiced every 7 days and N fertilizer should be applied at a rate of 216 kgN/ha.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seven-day irrigation throughout the season gave the highest grain yield across genotypes.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
irrigation every seven days through the seasone0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation every seven days through the season resulted in the highest grain yield from all tested genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–810 · show in text ↑
e1

“bread wheat (Triticum aestivum, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–193 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Extending irrigation from seven to fourteen days during planting to booting reduced grain yield by 19.6%.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume2
Organ / stage
planting to bootinge1
Treatment
Elongating the interval of irrigation from 7 to 14 dayse0
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
reductionse0
Value
19.6e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Elongating the interval of irrigation from 7 to 14 days at any of the three growth stages resulted in significant reductions estimated by 19.6, 13.4 and 9.8%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–983 · show in text ↑
e1

“from planting to booting, from booting to milk stage and from milk stage to maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–668 · show in text ↑
e2

“bread wheat (Triticum aestivum, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–193 · show in text ↑
e3

“irrigation every seven days through the season resulted in the highest grain yield from all tested genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–810 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Extending irrigation during booting to milk stage reduced grain yield by 13.4%.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume2
Organ / stage
booting to milk stagee1
Treatment
Elongating the interval of irrigation from 7 to 14 dayse0
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
reductionse0
Value
13.4e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Elongating the interval of irrigation from 7 to 14 days at any of the three growth stages resulted in significant reductions estimated by 19.6, 13.4 and 9.8%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–983 · show in text ↑
e1

“from planting to booting, from booting to milk stage and from milk stage to maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–668 · show in text ↑
e2

“bread wheat (Triticum aestivum, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–193 · show in text ↑
e3

“irrigation every seven days through the season resulted in the highest grain yield from all tested genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–810 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Extending irrigation during milk stage to maturity reduced grain yield by 9.8%.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume2
Organ / stage
milk stage to maturitye1
Treatment
Elongating the interval of irrigation from 7 to 14 dayse0
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
reductionse0
Value
9.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Elongating the interval of irrigation from 7 to 14 days at any of the three growth stages resulted in significant reductions estimated by 19.6, 13.4 and 9.8%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–983 · show in text ↑
e1

“from planting to booting, from booting to milk stage and from milk stage to maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–668 · show in text ↑
e2

“bread wheat (Triticum aestivum, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–193 · show in text ↑
e3

“irrigation every seven days through the season resulted in the highest grain yield from all tested genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–810 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer irrigation intervals depressed spikes per area, kernels per spike and thousand-kernel weight, especially early in growth.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
elongating the irrigation intervalse0
Outcome
number of spikes/m², number of kernels/spike and 1000-kernel weighte0
Direction
depressede0
Qualifier
reductions being more at the first stagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of spikes/m², number of kernels/spike and 1000-kernel weight were also depressed by elongating the irrigation intervals with reductions being more at the first stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1280 · show in text ↑
e1

“bread wheat (Triticum aestivum, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–193 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Each successive nitrogen level significantly increased grain yield and yield components.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
each successive level of nitrogen applicatione0
Outcome
Grain yield and yield componentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield and yield components of the different genotypes were significantly increased with each successive level of nitrogen application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1421 · show in text ↑
e1

“bread wheat (Triticum aestivum, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–193 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield differed significantly among genotypes.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume1
Material
the tested genotypese0
Outcome
grain yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“differences in grain yield among the tested genotypes were significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1436–1506 · show in text ↑
e1

“bread wheat (Triticum aestivum, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–193 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gemmeiza 5 had the highest grain yield at 5.81 t/ha, statistically indistinguishable from Sakha 93.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume1
Material
Gemmeiza 5e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5.81 t/hae0
Comparator
Sakha 93e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gemmeiza 5 gave the highest grain yield (5.81 t/ha) but was not significantly different from that produced by Sakha 93”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1508–1626 · show in text ↑
e1

“bread wheat (Triticum aestivum, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–193 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sakha 69 had the lowest grain yield at 4.61 t/ha.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume1
Material
Sakha 69e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Value
4.61 t/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sakha 69 gave the lowest grain yield (4.61 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1676–1724 · show in text ↑
e1

“bread wheat (Triticum aestivum, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–193 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment interactions were significant.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
different treatmentse0
Outcome
interactionse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interactions between the different treatments were significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1725–1791 · show in text ↑
e1

“bread wheat (Triticum aestivum, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–193 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highest yields occurred for Gemmeiza 5 and Sids 1 with seven-day irrigation and 216 kgN/ha fertilizer.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume1
Material
Gemmeiza 5 and Sids 1e0
Treatment
irrigated every 7 days throughout the season and fertilized with 216 kgN/hae0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest yields were produced from cultivars Gemmeiza 5 and Sids 1 irrigated every 7 days throughout the season and fertilized with 216 kgN/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1800–1941 · show in text ↑
e1

“bread wheat (Triticum aestivum, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–193 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes differed substantially in response to increasing nitrogen fertilizer.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume1
Material
the genotypese0
Treatment
increasing N fertilizer levele0
Outcome
responsee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“substantial difference among the genotypes in their response to increasing N fertilizer level was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1956–2062 · show in text ↑
e1

“bread wheat (Triticum aestivum, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–193 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield response index was highest for Gemmeiza 5 and lowest for Sakha69.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume1
Material
Gemmeiza 5e0
Outcome
Grain yield response index (GYRI)e0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
Sakha69e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield response index (GYRI) was highest for cultivar Gemmeiza 5 and lowest for Sakha69”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2064–2156 · show in text ↑
e1

“bread wheat (Triticum aestivum, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–193 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield response index and water-use efficiency were highest with seven-day irrigation at the first two stages and declined with longer intervals.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
shortest irrigation interval of 7 dayse0
Outcome
GYRI and water-use efficiency(WUE)e0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
elongating the intervalse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GYRI and water-use efficiency(WUE) were highest when the shortest irrigation interval of 7 days was followed at both the first and the second growth stages and were declined with elongating the intervals at either one of them”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2171–2396 · show in text ↑
e1

“bread wheat (Triticum aestivum, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–193 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen significantly increased water-use efficiency.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
increasing N applicatione0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WUE significantly increased with increasing N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2441–2498 · show in text ↑
e1

“bread wheat (Triticum aestivum, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–193 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water-use efficiency varied significantly among genotypes and was highest in high-yielding genotypes.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume1
Material
high-yielding genotypese0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant genotypic variation for WUE was obtained and the highest values were achieved from the high-yielding genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2510–2632 · show in text ↑
e1

“bread wheat (Triticum aestivum, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–193 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend Gemmeiza 5, Sakha 93, Giza168 and Sids 1 for reclaimed sandy soil in El-Bustan.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume1
Material
Gemmeiza 5 followed by Sakha 93 and Giza168 along with the commercial cultivar Sids 1e0
Outcome
recommended to be grown in the sandy soil of new reclaimed areae0
Setting
El-Bustan region (El-Behaira Governorate)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gemmeiza 5 followed by Sakha 93 and Giza168 along with the commercial cultivar Sids 1 are highly recommended to be grown in the sandy soil of new reclaimed area of El-Bustan region (El-Behaira Governorate)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2668–2873 · show in text ↑
e1

“bread wheat (Triticum aestivum, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–193 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

For maximum yield, the authors recommend seven-day irrigation.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume1
Outcome
irrigation should be practiced every 7 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for maximum yield, irrigation should be practiced every 7 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2878–2940 · show in text ↑
e1

“bread wheat (Triticum aestivum, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–193 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

For maximum yield, the authors recommend nitrogen at 216 kgN/ha.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume1
Outcome
N fertilizer should be applied at a rate of 216 kgN/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N fertilizer should be applied at a rate of 216 kgN/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2945–2999 · show in text ↑
e1

“bread wheat (Triticum aestivum, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–193 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

101 papers: 88 positive, 13 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

97 papers more in this group

See all 101 papers →

climate site · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 72 positive, 82 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 79 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

150 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.