Paper · 2000 · DergiPark (Istanbul University)

Herbicide-induced Resistance to Fusarium Wilt in Cotton and Gossypol Production of Host Cells

Yeter Canihoş; Şener Kurt; Hülya Özgönen

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Pretreating cotton seeds with some herbicidies used in cotton-growing areas of the Çukurova region markedly increased cotton resistance to Fusarium wilt caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum. Haloxyfob and linuron reduced the mycelial growth of the pathogen in both solid and liquid cultures. However, prometryn was more effective in plant development than linuron and haloxyfob. Synthesis of Phytoalexin gossypol was significantly produced in inoculated cotton plants compared with uninoculated control plants. Maximum amounts of gossypol production were obtained in herbicide-treated and inoculated cotton plants. Gossypol extracted from herbicide-treated plants markedly reduced the mycelial growth of the pathogen in vitro.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide pretreatment increased cotton resistance to Fusarium wilt.

Treatment
some herbicidiese0
Interactor
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectumFusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectume0pathogen
Outcome
cotton resistance to Fusarium wilte0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
Çukurova regione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pretreating cotton seeds with some herbicidies used in cotton-growing areas of the Çukurova region markedly increased cotton resistance to Fusarium wilt caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–201 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Haloxyfob reduced pathogen mycelial growth in culture.

Treatment
Haloxyfobe0
Outcome
mycelial growth of the pathogene0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
solid and liquid culturese0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Haloxyfob and linuron reduced the mycelial growth of the pathogen in both solid and liquid cultures.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–302 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Linuron reduced pathogen mycelial growth in culture.

Treatment
linurone0
Outcome
mycelial growth of the pathogene0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
solid and liquid culturese0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Haloxyfob and linuron reduced the mycelial growth of the pathogen in both solid and liquid cultures.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–302 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prometryn supported plant development more effectively than linuron.

Treatment
prometryne0
Outcome
plant developmente0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
linurone0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“prometryn was more effective in plant development than linuron and haloxyfob.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–389 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prometryn supported plant development more effectively than haloxyfob.

Treatment
prometryne0
Outcome
plant developmente0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
haloxyfobe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“prometryn was more effective in plant development than linuron and haloxyfob.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–389 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated cotton produced significantly more gossypol than uninoculated controls.

Treatment
inoculatede0
Outcome
Phytoalexin gossypole0
Comparator
uninoculated control plantse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Synthesis of Phytoalexin gossypol was significantly produced in inoculated cotton plants compared with uninoculated control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–521 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide treated and inoculated cotton had maximum gossypol production.

Treatment
herbicide-treated and inoculatede0
Outcome
Maximum amounts of gossypol productione0
Direction
Maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum amounts of gossypol production were obtained in herbicide-treated and inoculated cotton plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–625 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gossypol extracted from treated cotton reduced pathogen mycelial growth in vitro.

Treatment
Gossypol extracted from herbicide-treated plantse0
Outcome
mycelial growth of the pathogene0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
in vitroe0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Gossypol extracted from herbicide-treated plants markedly reduced the mycelial growth of the pathogen in vitro.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–737 · show in text ↑

prometryn · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

gossypol · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

herbicide · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.