Paper · 2022 · Plant Disease

First Report of Mesocriconema xenoplax from Apricots (Prunus armeniaca) in Ontario, Canada

Jerry Akanwari; Tahera Sultana; Elyse Aubry; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Plant-parasitic nematodes have been causing more economic losses and related damages to fruit crops in the Province of Ontario than previous estimates. We have been conducting surveys since 2019 for the presence of plant-parasitic nematodes in different orchards in the Niagara region. Collected soil samples were extracted for nematodes following Jenkins (1964). Among the plant-parasitic nematodes identified, we detected ring nematodes (Mesocriconema species) in 87% of the soil samples collected from different apricots fields, ranging from 20 to 200 ring nematode per kg of soil. The apricot cultivar was Haroblush and did not show any symptoms of nematode infestation. The morphometric measurements (mean in μm ± standard deviation, range) of the ring nematodes (adult females), n = 27), body length = (605 +/- 23, 550 - 650), stylet = (75 +/- 8, 65 - 79), a (total body length divided by maximum body diameter = 12 +/- 1.5, 10.2 - 13.9), b (total body length divided by pharyngeal length = 3.6 +/- 0.5, 3.2 - 3.9), c = 20, V (percentage of length from anterior end to vulva position in total body length) = 92 +/- 1.3,91 - 93), R (total body annules = 105 +/- 5, 100 - 110), Rvan (total annules between vulva and anus = 2), and Ran (total annules between anus and tail terminus = 5). Lips sclerotized, with conspicuous and elevated labial disc surrounding the oral aperture, sub-lateral lobes also conspicuous. The stylet was long and robust. Excretory pore was located between 30-31 annuli from the anterior end. The vulva located either between 6 and 7, but mostly between 7 and 8 annuli from the posterior end. The juveniles were similar to the females in body shape with: sub-lateral lobes present, stylet 55-60 µm long, total annuls 80-90, and fine longitudinal lines were observed. Based on the morphology (Figure 1) and morphometric characteristics, the nematode species was identified as Mesocriconema xenoplax, which was consistent with the description by Raski (1952). To further confirm, DNA was extracted from a total of 20 nematodes (females and juveniles), the D2-D3 expansion segment of 28S rDNA amplified using the primer pair: D2A: 5´-ACAAGTACCGTGAGGGAAAGT TG-3', D3B: 5'-TCCTCGGAAGGAACCAGCTACTA-3' (Nunn, 1992). The PCR product was purified and sequenced. The resulting sequence was deposited into the GenBank database and assigned with accession number ON130754. A BLAST search in the NCBI database revealed 99% similarity to sequences of M. xenoplax with accession numbers MH819082.1 and FN433854.1 from South Africa and California, respectively. Eight Haroblush plants were each inoculated with 100 ring nematodes/kg in 5-gallon pots. Haroblush without nematode were maintained as control. The nematode reproduction and symptoms were assessed after 6 and 24 months. The plants did not show below or aboveground symptoms after 6 months. However, root growth reduction, necrosis and death of feeder roots were observed after 24 months when compared to the control. Nematodes extracted from the soil had a mean of 512±48 and 1593±162 ring nematode/kg after 6 and 24 months, respectively, an indication of susceptibility. Mesocriconema xenoplax can cause 85% reduction in root biomass, and yield losses can occur at higher infestations (Pinkerton et al., 2004). Regardless, the potential impact and distribution of this nematode on apricots growth and yield in Ontario are not documented yet. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of the ring nematode M. xenoplax on apricots from Ontario, Canada.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ring nematodes were detected in 87% of apricot field soil samples at 20 to 200 per kg.

Taxon
apricotsPrunus armeniacae0
Interactor
Mesocriconema speciesMesocriconemae0pest
Outcome
ring nematodese0
Value
87%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we detected ring nematodes (Mesocriconema species) in 87% of the soil samples collected from different apricots fields, ranging from 20 to 200 ring nematode per kg of soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–584 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Haroblush showed no nematode infestation symptoms in surveyed fields.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacae0
Material
Haroblushe0
Outcome
symptoms of nematode infestatione0
Direction
did not showe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The apricot cultivar was Haroblush and did not show any symptoms of nematode infestation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–674 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Morphology identified the apricot ring nematode as Mesocriconema xenoplax.

Taxon
ApricotsPrunus armeniacat0
Interactor
Mesocriconema xenoplaxMesocriconema xenoplaxe0pest
Outcome
nematode species was identified as Mesocriconema xenoplaxe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the nematode species was identified as Mesocriconema xenoplax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1864–1925 · show in text ↑
t0

“First Report of Mesocriconema xenoplax from Apricots (Prunus armeniaca) in Ontario, Canada”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The nematode sequence was 99% similar to M. xenoplax references.

Taxon
ApricotsPrunus armeniacat0
Interactor
M. xenoplaxe0pest
Outcome
similarity to sequences of M. xenoplaxe0
Value
99%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A BLAST search in the NCBI database revealed 99% similarity to sequences of M. xenoplax with accession numbers MH819082.1 and FN433854.1 from South Africa and California, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2389–2573 · show in text ↑
t0

“First Report of Mesocriconema xenoplax from Apricots (Prunus armeniaca) in Ontario, Canada”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated Haroblush had no visible symptoms after six months.

Taxon
ApricotsPrunus armeniacat0
Material
Haroblushe1
Treatment
inoculated with 100 ring nematodes/kge1
Interactor
ring nematodese1pest
Outcome
below or aboveground symptomse0
Direction
did not showe0
Comparator
without nematodee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plants did not show below or aboveground symptoms after 6 months.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2794–2863 · show in text ↑
t0

“First Report of Mesocriconema xenoplax from Apricots (Prunus armeniaca) in Ontario, Canada”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–90 · show in text ↑
e1

“Eight Haroblush plants were each inoculated with 100 ring nematodes/kg in 5-gallon pots. Haroblush without nematode were maintained as control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2574–2717 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated Haroblush developed reduced root growth, necrosis and feeder root death after 24 months.

Taxon
ApricotsPrunus armeniacat0
Treatment
inoculated with 100 ring nematodes/kge1
Interactor
ring nematodese1pest
Outcome
root growth reduction, necrosis and death of feeder rootse0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root growth reduction, necrosis and death of feeder roots were observed after 24 months when compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2873–2990 · show in text ↑
t0

“First Report of Mesocriconema xenoplax from Apricots (Prunus armeniaca) in Ontario, Canada”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–90 · show in text ↑
e1

“Eight Haroblush plants were each inoculated with 100 ring nematodes/kg in 5-gallon pots. Haroblush without nematode were maintained as control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2574–2717 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil nematode counts reached 512±48 per kg after six months.

Taxon
ApricotsPrunus armeniacat0
Interactor
ring nematodee0pest
Outcome
Nematodes extracted from the soile0
Value
512±48e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nematodes extracted from the soil had a mean of 512±48 and 1593±162 ring nematode/kg after 6 and 24 months, respectively, an indication of susceptibility.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2991–3145 · show in text ↑
t0

“First Report of Mesocriconema xenoplax from Apricots (Prunus armeniaca) in Ontario, Canada”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil nematode counts reached 1593±162 per kg after 24 months.

Taxon
ApricotsPrunus armeniacat0
Interactor
ring nematodee0pest
Outcome
Nematodes extracted from the soile0
Value
1593±162 ring nematode/kge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nematodes extracted from the soil had a mean of 512±48 and 1593±162 ring nematode/kg after 6 and 24 months, respectively, an indication of susceptibility.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2991–3145 · show in text ↑
t0

“First Report of Mesocriconema xenoplax from Apricots (Prunus armeniaca) in Ontario, Canada”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors report M. xenoplax on apricots in Ontario for the first time.

Taxon
apricotsPrunus armeniacae0
Interactor
M. xenoplaxe0pest
Outcome
first report of the ring nematode M. xenoplax on apricotse0
Setting
Ontario, Canadae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this is the first report of the ring nematode M. xenoplax on apricots from Ontario, Canada.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3447–3538 · show in text ↑

inoculation · disease · Prunus armeniaca (apricot)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 1 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.