Abstract
Jassid (Amarasca biguttula bigutula) is one of the most serious pests of Okra. It sucks the sap from underside of leaves and causes upward curling along the margin ultimately reducing the yield. An experiment was conducted in research field of Agriculture and Forestry University (AFU) in 2019 to analyze the efficacy of different botanical and chemical pesticides in the management of Okra Jassid. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with five treatments and four replications. The treatments were Chemical (Chloropyriphos 50% EC and Cypermethrin 5% EC) (2 ml/l), Neem (Azadirachta indica) extract (2 ml/l), Ganja (Cannabis sativa) extract (100 g/l), Jholmol (125 ml/l) and untreated control. The pest population was found lowest with the use of chemical pesticide (1.9, 12.24, 24.45 after the first, second and third spray respectively). The effect of neem, jholmol and ganja were statistically at par in suppressing Jassid population after the first spray. However, among biopesticides, Neem extract was significantly most effective after the second and third treatment. Cannabis extract was the least effective after the third treatment among the insecticides but significantly reduced the pest population than the controlled treatment. This research has given emphasizes on biopesticides as they are cheap, locally available, eco-friendly and avoid the problem of pesticide resistance, pest resurgence and pesticide residue. Neem extract was found somehow comparable to the chemical pesticide in reducing pest infestation. Thus, neem extract can be used as an alternative to chemical pesticides with other IPM approaches for the sustainable management of Okra Jassid.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Chemical pesticide yielded the lowest jassid population after each spray.
- Taxon
- Okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- chemical pesticidee0
- Interactor
- Amrasca biguttula biguttulaAmrasca biguttula biguttulat0pest
- Outcome
- pest populatione0
- Direction
- loweste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The pest population was found lowest with the use of chemical pesticide (1.9, 12.24, 24.45 after the first, second and third spray respectively).”
t0“Management of okra jassid (Amrasca biguttula biguttula) through the use of botanicals and chemical pesticides under field conditions in Chitwan, Nepal”
Claim · model-written summary
Chemical pesticide gave a jassid population of 1.9 after the first spray.
- Taxon
- Okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- chemical pesticidee0
- Interactor
- Amrasca biguttula biguttulaAmrasca biguttula biguttulat0pest
- Outcome
- pest populationt1
- Value
- 1.9e0
- Qualifier
- after the firste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“chemical pesticide (1.9, 12.24, 24.45 after the first, second and third spray respectively)”
t0“Management of okra jassid (Amrasca biguttula biguttula) through the use of botanicals and chemical pesticides under field conditions in Chitwan, Nepal”
t1“The pest population was found lowest”
Claim · model-written summary
Chemical pesticide gave a jassid population of 12.24 after the second spray.
- Taxon
- Okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- chemical pesticidee0
- Interactor
- Amrasca biguttula biguttulaAmrasca biguttula biguttulat0pest
- Outcome
- pest populationt1
- Value
- 12.24e0
- Qualifier
- seconde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“chemical pesticide (1.9, 12.24, 24.45 after the first, second and third spray respectively)”
t0“Management of okra jassid (Amrasca biguttula biguttula) through the use of botanicals and chemical pesticides under field conditions in Chitwan, Nepal”
t1“The pest population was found lowest”
Claim · model-written summary
Chemical pesticide gave a jassid population of 24.45 after the third spray.
- Taxon
- Okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- chemical pesticidee0
- Interactor
- Amrasca biguttula biguttulaAmrasca biguttula biguttulat0pest
- Outcome
- pest populationt1
- Value
- 24.45e0
- Qualifier
- third spraye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“chemical pesticide (1.9, 12.24, 24.45 after the first, second and third spray respectively)”
t0“Management of okra jassid (Amrasca biguttula biguttula) through the use of botanicals and chemical pesticides under field conditions in Chitwan, Nepal”
t1“The pest population was found lowest”
Claim · model-written summary
Neem, jholmol and ganja had statistically similar jassid suppression after the first spray.
- Taxon
- Okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Interactor
- Amrasca biguttula biguttulaAmrasca biguttula biguttulat0pest
- Outcome
- suppressing Jassid populatione0
- Direction
- statistically at pare0
- Qualifier
- after the first spraye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The effect of neem, jholmol and ganja were statistically at par in suppressing Jassid population after the first spray.”
t0“Management of okra jassid (Amrasca biguttula biguttula) through the use of botanicals and chemical pesticides under field conditions in Chitwan, Nepal”
Claim · model-written summary
Neem extract was the most effective biopesticide after the second and third sprays.
- Taxon
- Okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- Neem extracte0
- Interactor
- Amrasca biguttula biguttulaAmrasca biguttula biguttulat0pest
- Outcome
- most effectivee0
- Direction
- most effectivee0
- Qualifier
- after the second and third treatmente0
- Comparator
- biopesticidese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“among biopesticides, Neem extract was significantly most effective after the second and third treatment.”
t0“Management of okra jassid (Amrasca biguttula biguttula) through the use of botanicals and chemical pesticides under field conditions in Chitwan, Nepal”
Claim · model-written summary
Cannabis extract was least effective among insecticides after the third treatment.
- Taxon
- Okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- Cannabis extracte0
- Interactor
- Amrasca biguttula biguttulaAmrasca biguttula biguttulat0pest
- Outcome
- least effectivee0
- Direction
- least effectivee0
- Qualifier
- after the third treatmente0
- Comparator
- insecticidese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Cannabis extract was the least effective after the third treatment among the insecticides”
t0“Management of okra jassid (Amrasca biguttula biguttula) through the use of botanicals and chemical pesticides under field conditions in Chitwan, Nepal”
Claim · model-written summary
Cannabis extract significantly lowered the pest population compared with untreated control.
- Taxon
- Okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- Cannabis extractt1
- Interactor
- Amrasca biguttula biguttulaAmrasca biguttula biguttulat0pest
- Outcome
- pest populatione0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- controlled treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“significantly reduced the pest population than the controlled treatment”
t0“Management of okra jassid (Amrasca biguttula biguttula) through the use of botanicals and chemical pesticides under field conditions in Chitwan, Nepal”
t1“Cannabis extract was the least effective”
Claim · model-written summary
Neem extract was somewhat comparable to chemical pesticide in reducing pest infestation.
- Taxon
- Okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- Neem extracte0
- Interactor
- Amrasca biguttula biguttulaAmrasca biguttula biguttulat0pest
- Outcome
- pest infestatione0
- Direction
- reducinge0
- Comparator
- chemical pesticidee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Neem extract was found somehow comparable to the chemical pesticide in reducing pest infestation.”
t0“Management of okra jassid (Amrasca biguttula biguttula) through the use of botanicals and chemical pesticides under field conditions in Chitwan, Nepal”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend neem extract with other IPM approaches for sustainable okra jassid management.
- Taxon
- Okra
Abelmoschus esculentuse0 - Interactor
- Amrasca biguttula biguttulaAmrasca biguttula biguttulat0pest
- Outcome
- neem extract can be used as an alternative to chemical pesticides with other IPM approaches for the sustainable management of Okra Jasside0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“neem extract can be used as an alternative to chemical pesticides with other IPM approaches for the sustainable management of Okra Jassid.”
t0“Management of okra jassid (Amrasca biguttula biguttula) through the use of botanicals and chemical pesticides under field conditions in Chitwan, Nepal”
The same questions in other papers
Azadirachta indica · Amrasca biguttula biguttula · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
insecticide · Amrasca biguttula biguttula · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
botanical · Amrasca biguttula biguttula · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.