Paper · 2013 · Sindh University Research Journal

FIELD EVALUATION OF BIO-PESTICIDES AGAINST JASSID, AMRASCA BIGUTTULA BIGUTTULA (ISHIDA) IN OKRA CROP

Bhai Khan Solangi; Riffat Sultana; V. Suthar; et al.

11
claims
44
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field studies on evaluation of biopesticides against jassid, Amrasca biguttula biguttula (Ishida) in okra crop was carried out at the experimental area of Habib Farm, District Hyderabad, during the year 2012. The crop was sown on well preapred seedbed keeping 45 cm distance between ridge to ridge, after thinning a plant to plant distance of 22.5 cm in CRB design. During the present study four replications and five treatments i.e. T1 (Neem Powder), T2 (Tobacco leaves), T3 (Neem Oil), T4 (Neem oil + Beneficial micro-organism B.M), T5 (Control) were used. The pre-treatment observations were taken 24 hours before spray whereas post-treatment observations were taken at the intervals of 24, 48 and 72 hours and after one and two weeks. Relative neem oil + BM displayed greater reduction of jassid population (78.47%), followed by neem oil (76.57%), whereas, neem powder (65.46%) and tabacco leaves (63.16%) were less effective in reducing the population of jassid in field. However, during 2nd and 3rd spray the efficacy of all products remained the same altough it was higher as compared to 1st spray. The average performance of three sprays was maximum in case of (Neem oil + B.M ) (81.28%), followed by neem oil (79.40%), neem powder (72.93%) and tabacco leaves (69.00%) respectively. The present study strongly suggests that the use of bio-pesticides may be helpfull to reduce the effect of pesticides in the environment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem oil plus beneficial microorganisms reduced jassid population by 78.47%.

Treatment
neem oil + BMe0
Interactor
Amrasca biguttula biguttulaAmrasca biguttula biguttulae3pest
Outcome
jassid populatione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
78.47%e0
Comparator
Controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“neem oil + BM displayed greater reduction of jassid population (78.47%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–819 · show in text ↑
e1

“okra crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–110 · show in text ↑
e2

“T5 (Control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–547 · show in text ↑
e3

“Amrasca biguttula biguttula (Ishida)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem oil reduced jassid population by 76.57%.

Treatment
neem oile0
Interactor
Amrasca biguttula biguttulaAmrasca biguttula biguttulae4pest
Outcome
jassid populatione1
Direction
reductione1
Value
76.57%e0
Comparator
Controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by neem oil (76.57%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–850 · show in text ↑
e1

“reduction of jassid population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–810 · show in text ↑
e2

“okra crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–110 · show in text ↑
e3

“T5 (Control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–547 · show in text ↑
e4

“Amrasca biguttula biguttula (Ishida)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem powder reduced jassid population by 65.46%.

Treatment
neem powdere0
Interactor
Amrasca biguttula biguttulaAmrasca biguttula biguttulae3pest
Outcome
population of jasside0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
65.46%e0
Comparator
Controle2
Setting
fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“neem powder (65.46%) and tabacco leaves (63.16%) were less effective in reducing the population of jassid in field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–975 · show in text ↑
e1

“okra crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–110 · show in text ↑
e2

“T5 (Control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–547 · show in text ↑
e3

“Amrasca biguttula biguttula (Ishida)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tobacco leaves reduced jassid population by 63.16%.

Treatment
tabacco leavese0
Interactor
Amrasca biguttula biguttulaAmrasca biguttula biguttulae3pest
Outcome
population of jasside0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
63.16%e0
Comparator
Controle2
Setting
fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“neem powder (65.46%) and tabacco leaves (63.16%) were less effective in reducing the population of jassid in field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–975 · show in text ↑
e1

“okra crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–110 · show in text ↑
e2

“T5 (Control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–547 · show in text ↑
e3

“Amrasca biguttula biguttula (Ishida)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Efficacy of all products was the same during second and third sprays.

Interactor
jasside2pest
Outcome
efficacy of all productse0
Direction
remained the samee0
Qualifier
during 2nd and 3rd spraye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“during 2nd and 3rd spray the efficacy of all products remained the same”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1057 · show in text ↑
e1

“okra crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–110 · show in text ↑
e2

“population of jassid in field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–975 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Product efficacy during the second and third sprays was higher than during the first spray.

Interactor
jasside2pest
Outcome
efficacy of all productse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
1st spraye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“during 2nd and 3rd spray the efficacy of all products remained the same altough it was higher as compared to 1st spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1104 · show in text ↑
e1

“okra crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–110 · show in text ↑
e2

“population of jassid in field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–975 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across three sprays, neem oil plus beneficial microorganisms had 81.28% average performance.

Treatment
Neem oil + B.Me0
Interactor
jasside3pest
Outcome
average performance of three sprayse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
81.28%e0
Comparator
Controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average performance of three sprays was maximum in case of (Neem oil + B.M ) (81.28%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1195 · show in text ↑
e1

“okra crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–110 · show in text ↑
e2

“T5 (Control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–547 · show in text ↑
e3

“population of jassid in field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–975 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across three sprays, neem oil had 79.40% average performance.

Treatment
neem oile0
Interactor
jasside4pest
Outcome
average performance of three sprayse1
Value
79.40%e0
Comparator
Controle3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by neem oil (79.40%), neem powder (72.93%) and tabacco leaves (69.00%) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1289 · show in text ↑
e1

“The average performance of three sprays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1145 · show in text ↑
e2

“okra crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–110 · show in text ↑
e3

“T5 (Control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–547 · show in text ↑
e4

“population of jassid in field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–975 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across three sprays, neem powder had 72.93% average performance.

Treatment
neem powdere0
Interactor
jasside4pest
Outcome
average performance of three sprayse1
Value
72.93%e0
Comparator
Controle3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by neem oil (79.40%), neem powder (72.93%) and tabacco leaves (69.00%) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1289 · show in text ↑
e1

“The average performance of three sprays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1145 · show in text ↑
e2

“okra crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–110 · show in text ↑
e3

“T5 (Control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–547 · show in text ↑
e4

“population of jassid in field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–975 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across three sprays, tobacco leaves had 69.00% average performance.

Treatment
tabacco leavese0
Interactor
jasside4pest
Outcome
average performance of three sprayse1
Value
69.00%e0
Comparator
Controle3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by neem oil (79.40%), neem powder (72.93%) and tabacco leaves (69.00%) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1289 · show in text ↑
e1

“The average performance of three sprays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1145 · show in text ↑
e2

“okra crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–110 · show in text ↑
e3

“T5 (Control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–547 · show in text ↑
e4

“population of jassid in field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–975 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend biopesticides to reduce environmental effects of pesticides.

Outcome
the use of bio-pesticides may be helpfull to reduce the effect of pesticides in the environmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of bio-pesticides may be helpfull to reduce the effect of pesticides in the environment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1332–1427 · show in text ↑
e1

“okra crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–110 · show in text ↑

Azadirachta indica · Amrasca biguttula biguttula · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · Amrasca biguttula biguttula · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.