Abstract
Abstract Foliar application of diphenylamine as a spray or dust on apple and as a dust on bean, muskmelon, petunia and tobacco plants afforded highly significant protection against visible injury when the plants were exposed to ozone in a modified growth chamber. Concentrations of diphenylamine of about 1% as a dust and 500-1000 ppm as a spray were effective.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Diphenylamine significantly protected apple against visible ozone injury.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticae0 - Treatment
- diphenylamine as a spray or duste0
- Outcome
- visible injurye0
- Direction
- protectione0
- Setting
- modified growth chambere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Foliar application of diphenylamine as a spray or dust on apple and as a dust on bean, muskmelon, petunia and tobacco plants afforded highly significant protection against visible injury when the plants were exposed to ozone in a modified growth chamber.”
Claim · model-written summary
Diphenylamine significantly protected bean against visible ozone injury.
- Taxon
- beane0
- Treatment
- as a duste0
- Outcome
- visible injurye0
- Direction
- protectione0
- Setting
- modified growth chambere0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Foliar application of diphenylamine as a spray or dust on apple and as a dust on bean, muskmelon, petunia and tobacco plants afforded highly significant protection against visible injury when the plants were exposed to ozone in a modified growth chamber.”
Claim · model-written summary
Diphenylamine significantly protected muskmelon against visible ozone injury.
- Taxon
- muskmelon
.jpg?width=60)
Cucumis meloe0 - Treatment
- as a duste0
- Outcome
- visible injurye0
- Direction
- protectione0
- Setting
- modified growth chambere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Foliar application of diphenylamine as a spray or dust on apple and as a dust on bean, muskmelon, petunia and tobacco plants afforded highly significant protection against visible injury when the plants were exposed to ozone in a modified growth chamber.”
Claim · model-written summary
Diphenylamine significantly protected petunia against visible ozone injury.
_flowers_in_Westgate_Gardens%2C_Canterbury.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
PetuniaNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_flowers_in_Westgate_Gardens%2C_Canterbury.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Foliar application of diphenylamine as a spray or dust on apple and as a dust on bean, muskmelon, petunia and tobacco plants afforded highly significant protection against visible injury when the plants were exposed to ozone in a modified growth chamber.”
Claim · model-written summary
Diphenylamine significantly protected tobacco against visible ozone injury.
- Taxon
- tobacco
Nicotiana tabacume0 - Treatment
- as a duste0
- Outcome
- visible injurye0
- Direction
- protectione0
- Setting
- modified growth chambere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Foliar application of diphenylamine as a spray or dust on apple and as a dust on bean, muskmelon, petunia and tobacco plants afforded highly significant protection against visible injury when the plants were exposed to ozone in a modified growth chamber.”
The same questions in other papers
diphenylamine · crop injury · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →application · crop injury · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.