Abstract
Three experiments were conducted to explore the use of diphenylamine to prevent fruit injury resulting from fumigation with methyl bromide. Two were conducted in Western Australia on Granny Smith apples and one in Tasmania on Granny Smith and Crofton apples. The results showed clearly that diphenylamine either as a dip or as a wrap prevented methyl bromide injury, but oil-impregnated wraps did not.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
A diphenylamine dip prevented methyl bromide injury in apples.
- Taxon
- apples
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- diphenylamine either as a dipe0
- Outcome
- methyl bromide injurye0
- Direction
- preventede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“diphenylamine either as a dip or as a wrap prevented methyl bromide injury”
t0“apples”
Claim · model-written summary
A diphenylamine wrap prevented methyl bromide injury in apples.
- Taxon
- applesMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- diphenylamine either as a dip or as a wrape0
- Outcome
- methyl bromide injurye0
- Direction
- preventede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“diphenylamine either as a dip or as a wrap prevented methyl bromide injury”
t0“apples”
Claim · model-written summary
Oil impregnated wraps did not prevent methyl bromide injury in apples.
- Taxon
- applesMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- oil-impregnated wrapse0
- Direction
- did note0
Not reportedComparatorOutcome
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“but oil-impregnated wraps did not”
t0“apples”
The same questions in other papers
diphenylamine · crop injury · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.