Abstract
Abstract Irrigation did not influence total yield, growth, or longevity of ‘Elberta’ or ‘Redhaven’ peach trees. Yields were depressed when N was reduced to 0.2 kg/tree (approx 1/2 recommended rate) with both cultivars. Increasing N above the recommended rate did not influence yield. Highest yields were obtained with lightest pruning level but fruit size was reduced. Random tree loss occurred with all treatments but was highest with low N rates.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation did not influence total yield, growth or longevity of peach trees.
- Taxon
- Peach Trees
Prunus persicat0 - Treatment
- Irrigatione0
- Outcome
- total yield, growth, or longevitye0
- Direction
- did not influencee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Peach Trees”
e0“Irrigation did not influence total yield, growth, or longevity of”
Claim · model-written summary
Yields of both cultivars were depressed when N was reduced to 0.2 kg/tree, about half the recommended rate.
- Taxon
- Peach Trees
Prunus persicat0 - Material
- both cultivarse1
- Treatment
- N was reduced to 0.2 kg/treee1
- Outcome
- Yieldse1
- Direction
- depressede1
- Value
- 0.2 kg/treee1
- Comparator
- recommended ratee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Peach Trees”
e1“Yields were depressed when N was reduced to 0.2 kg/tree (approx 1/2 recommended rate) with both cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing N above the recommended rate did not influence yield.
- Taxon
- Peach Trees
Prunus persicat0 - Treatment
- Increasing N above the recommended ratee2
- Outcome
- yielde2
- Direction
- did not influencee2
- Comparator
- recommended ratee2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Peach Trees”
e2“Increasing N above the recommended rate did not influence yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Highest yields were obtained with the lightest pruning level.
- Taxon
- Peach Trees
Prunus persicat0 - Treatment
- lightest pruning levele3
- Outcome
- yieldse3
- Direction
- Higheste3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Peach Trees”
e3“Highest yields were obtained with lightest pruning level but fruit size was reduced”
Claim · model-written summary
The lightest pruning level reduced fruit size.
- Taxon
- Peach Trees
Prunus persicat0 - Treatment
- lightest pruning levele3
- Outcome
- fruit sizee3
- Direction
- reducede3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Peach Trees”
e3“Highest yields were obtained with lightest pruning level but fruit size was reduced”
Claim · model-written summary
Random tree loss was highest with low N rates.
- Taxon
- Peach Trees
Prunus persicat0 - Treatment
- low N ratese4
- Outcome
- Random tree losse4
- Direction
- higheste4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Peach Trees”
e4“Random tree loss occurred with all treatments but was highest with low N rates”
Claim · model-written summary
Random tree loss occurred with all treatments.
- Taxon
- Peach Trees
Prunus persicat0 - Treatment
- all treatmentse4
- Outcome
- Random tree losse4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Peach Trees”
e4“Random tree loss occurred with all treatments but was highest with low N rates”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · pest · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →light · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →pruning · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results
62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
93 papers more in this group
See all 97 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.