Paper · 1971 · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry

Influence of level and type of pruning on yield and growth respnses of young Golden Queen peach trees

Heek LAG van

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Two-year-old Goldet1 Queen peach trees were pruned under five pruning systems ranging froin the conventional severe pruning, to very light pruning and yields and tree size were measured until the trees were seven years old. The lighter pruned trees cropped earlier and carried more fruit. Over the full period the lightest pruned trees carried 55.5 tonnes more than the heaviest pruned trees. After five years of differential pruning, all trees were approximately the same size and they were all then pruned and thinned at the same (very light) level for a further two years. There were no residual effects on yield or growth from the earlier treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lighter pruned trees cropped earlier.

Taxon
peach treesPrunus persicat0
Treatment
lighter prunede0
Outcome
cropped earliere0
Direction
earliere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lighter pruned trees cropped earlier and carried more fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–288 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lighter pruned trees carried more fruit.

Taxon
peach treesPrunus persicat0
Treatment
lighter prunede0
Outcome
fruite0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lighter pruned trees cropped earlier and carried more fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–288 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lightest pruning produced 55.5 tonnes more fruit than heaviest pruning across the full period.

Taxon
peach treesPrunus persicat0
Treatment
lightest prunede0
Outcome
carriede0
Direction
moree0
Value
55.5 tonnese0
Comparator
heaviest pruned treese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Over the full period the lightest pruned trees carried 55.5 tonnes more than the heaviest pruned trees.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–392 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tree size was approximately equal after five years of differential pruning.

Taxon
peach treesPrunus persicat0
Outcome
same sizee0
Direction
approximately the samee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After five years of differential pruning, all trees were approximately the same size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–477 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earlier pruning treatments left no residual yield effect after common management.

Taxon
peach treesPrunus persicat0
Treatment
earlier treatmentse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no residual effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no residual effects on yield or growth from the earlier treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–654 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earlier pruning treatments left no residual growth effect after common management.

Taxon
peach treesPrunus persicat0
Treatment
earlier treatmentse0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
no residual effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no residual effects on yield or growth from the earlier treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–654 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–101 · show in text ↑

light · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

pruning · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

97 papers: 63 positive, 34 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.