Paper · 2022 · Open Life Sciences

Agronomic and economic performance of mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) varieties in response to rates of blended NPS fertilizer in Kindo Koysha district, Southern Ethiopia

Mulu Baza; Dereje Shanka; Mesfin Bibiso

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
25
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Mung bean is one of Ethiopia’s most important pulse crops in the lowlands. The main constraints to mung bean productivity in Ethiopia are low soil fertility and improved varieties. During the 2018 cropping season, a field experiment was conducted in Kindo Koysha woreda with the objective of evaluating the effects of NPS fertilizer rates on yield and yield attributing traits of four mung bean varieties. Treatments consisted of factorial combinations of four mung bean varieties (N26, Shewarobit, NVL-1, and Chinese) with four NPS fertilizer rates (0, 50, 100, and 150 kg ha −1 ) laid out in randomized complete block design with three replications. The combination of the N26 variety with 150 kg NPS produced the highest number of pods per plant (15.46), seeds per pod (10.93), grain yield (1240.70 kg ha −1 ), and biomass (3177.40 kg ha −1 ). Moreover, the combination of 100 kg NPS ha −1 with the variety N26 also generated the highest net return (31,734.30 Birr ha −1 ) with a marginal rate of return of 771.71%. Thus, it may be tentatively stated that the usage of 100 kg NPS ha −1 with the variety N26 was determined to be optimum for the development of mung bean in the study region.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N26 with 150 kg NPS had the highest pod count, 15.46 per plant.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Material
N26e0
Treatment
150 kg NPSe0
Outcome
number of pods per plante0
Direction
higheste0
Value
15.46e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combination of the N26 variety with 150 kg NPS produced the highest number of pods per plant (15.46)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–765 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N26 with 150 kg NPS had the highest seeds per pod, 10.93.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Material
N26e0
Treatment
150 kg NPSe0
Outcome
seeds per pode0
Direction
higheste0
Value
10.93e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combination of the N26 variety with 150 kg NPS produced the highest number of pods per plant (15.46), seeds per pod (10.93)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–788 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N26 with 150 kg NPS had the highest grain yield, 1240.70 kg ha −1.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Material
N26e0
Treatment
150 kg NPSe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1240.70 kg ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combination of the N26 variety with 150 kg NPS produced the highest number of pods per plant (15.46), seeds per pod (10.93), grain yield (1240.70 kg ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–821 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N26 with 150 kg NPS had the highest biomass, 3177.40 kg ha −1.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Material
N26e0
Treatment
150 kg NPSe0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3177.40 kg ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combination of the N26 variety with 150 kg NPS produced the highest number of pods per plant (15.46), seeds per pod (10.93), grain yield (1240.70 kg ha −1 ), and biomass (3177.40 kg ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–854 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N26 with 100 kg NPS per hectare gave the highest net return of 31,734.30 Birr ha −1.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Material
N26e0
Treatment
100 kg NPS ha −1e0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
31,734.30 Birr ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination of 100 kg NPS ha −1 with the variety N26 also generated the highest net return (31,734.30 Birr ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–984 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N26 with 100 kg NPS per hectare had a marginal return rate of 771.71%.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Material
N26e0
Treatment
100 kg NPS ha −1e0
Outcome
marginal rate of returne0
Value
771.71%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination of 100 kg NPS ha −1 with the variety N26 also generated the highest net return (31,734.30 Birr ha −1 ) with a marginal rate of return of 771.71%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–1026 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–66 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors tentatively recommend N26 with 100 kg NPS per hectare as optimum in the study region.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Material
N26e0
Treatment
100 kg NPS ha −1e0
Outcome
optimum for the development of mung beane0
Setting
study regione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the usage of 100 kg NPS ha −1 with the variety N26 was determined to be optimum for the development of mung bean in the study region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1200 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–66 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 32 positive, 4 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

26 papers: 26 positive, 0 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.