Abstract
Abstract Mung bean is one of Ethiopia’s most important pulse crops in the lowlands. The main constraints to mung bean productivity in Ethiopia are low soil fertility and improved varieties. During the 2018 cropping season, a field experiment was conducted in Kindo Koysha woreda with the objective of evaluating the effects of NPS fertilizer rates on yield and yield attributing traits of four mung bean varieties. Treatments consisted of factorial combinations of four mung bean varieties (N26, Shewarobit, NVL-1, and Chinese) with four NPS fertilizer rates (0, 50, 100, and 150 kg ha −1 ) laid out in randomized complete block design with three replications. The combination of the N26 variety with 150 kg NPS produced the highest number of pods per plant (15.46), seeds per pod (10.93), grain yield (1240.70 kg ha −1 ), and biomass (3177.40 kg ha −1 ). Moreover, the combination of 100 kg NPS ha −1 with the variety N26 also generated the highest net return (31,734.30 Birr ha −1 ) with a marginal rate of return of 771.71%. Thus, it may be tentatively stated that the usage of 100 kg NPS ha −1 with the variety N26 was determined to be optimum for the development of mung bean in the study region.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
N26 with 150 kg NPS had the highest pod count, 15.46 per plant.
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatat0 - Material
- N26e0
- Treatment
- 150 kg NPSe0
- Outcome
- number of pods per plante0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 15.46e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The combination of the N26 variety with 150 kg NPS produced the highest number of pods per plant (15.46)”
t0“mung bean (Vigna radiata L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
N26 with 150 kg NPS had the highest seeds per pod, 10.93.
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatat0 - Material
- N26e0
- Treatment
- 150 kg NPSe0
- Outcome
- seeds per pode0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 10.93e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The combination of the N26 variety with 150 kg NPS produced the highest number of pods per plant (15.46), seeds per pod (10.93)”
t0“mung bean (Vigna radiata L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
N26 with 150 kg NPS had the highest grain yield, 1240.70 kg ha −1.
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatat0 - Material
- N26e0
- Treatment
- 150 kg NPSe0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 1240.70 kg ha −1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The combination of the N26 variety with 150 kg NPS produced the highest number of pods per plant (15.46), seeds per pod (10.93), grain yield (1240.70 kg ha −1 )”
t0“mung bean (Vigna radiata L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
N26 with 150 kg NPS had the highest biomass, 3177.40 kg ha −1.
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatat0 - Material
- N26e0
- Treatment
- 150 kg NPSe0
- Outcome
- biomasse0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 3177.40 kg ha −1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The combination of the N26 variety with 150 kg NPS produced the highest number of pods per plant (15.46), seeds per pod (10.93), grain yield (1240.70 kg ha −1 ), and biomass (3177.40 kg ha −1 )”
t0“mung bean (Vigna radiata L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
N26 with 100 kg NPS per hectare gave the highest net return of 31,734.30 Birr ha −1.
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatat0 - Material
- N26e0
- Treatment
- 100 kg NPS ha −1e0
- Outcome
- net returne0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 31,734.30 Birr ha −1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“the combination of 100 kg NPS ha −1 with the variety N26 also generated the highest net return (31,734.30 Birr ha −1 )”
t0“mung bean (Vigna radiata L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
N26 with 100 kg NPS per hectare had a marginal return rate of 771.71%.
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatat0 - Material
- N26e0
- Treatment
- 100 kg NPS ha −1e0
- Outcome
- marginal rate of returne0
- Value
- 771.71%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“the combination of 100 kg NPS ha −1 with the variety N26 also generated the highest net return (31,734.30 Birr ha −1 ) with a marginal rate of return of 771.71%”
t0“mung bean (Vigna radiata L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors tentatively recommend N26 with 100 kg NPS per hectare as optimum in the study region.
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatat0 - Material
- N26e0
- Treatment
- 100 kg NPS ha −1e0
- Outcome
- optimum for the development of mung beane0
- Setting
- study regione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“the usage of 100 kg NPS ha −1 with the variety N26 was determined to be optimum for the development of mung bean in the study region”
t0“mung bean (Vigna radiata L.)”
The same questions in other papers
nanoparticle · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
32 papers more in this group
See all 36 papers →nanoparticle · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
25 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.