Paper · 2022 · Agronomy

Rice (Oryza sativa L.)–Baby Corn (Zea mays L.) Cropping System Response to Different Summer Green Manuring and Nutrient Management

Vikash Kumar; Manoj Kumar Singh; Nikhil Raghuvanshi; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
6
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The nutrient and biomass supply capacity of green manure (GM) and its complimentary and synergistic relationship with chemical nutrients is needed for a sustainable rice–baby corn cropping system in the eastern part of North India. A two-year field study was performed to assess the effect of GM and nitrogen management (NM) on yield attributes (YA), the yield of rice, and their residual (R) effect with the half-recommended dose of fertilizers on the succeeding baby corn crop. The combination of GM and N levels had significant effects on rice yield, which also influenced the succeeding baby corn crop. A higher number of tillers/m2, panicle length (cm), number of grains/panicles, panicle weight (g), grain yield (Mg/ha), straw yield (Mg/ha), and biological yield (Mg/ha) were found with Sesbania aculeata incorporated at 45 DAS (SA), which was statistically on par with water hyacinth 5 t/ha dry weight basis (WH) during both years of the field study. Among the rates of nitrogen fertilizers, 100% RDN (50% N through FYM + 50% N through inorganic) (RDN100) was the best treatment with a corresponding increase in all YA and yields of rice. It has been proven that integrated nitrogen management (INM), or the use of organic material along with fertilizer, is an effective way of managing nitrogen. In the present investigation, green manuring and integrated nitrogen management on rice sustainably increased the yield attributes and yield of the succeeding baby corn. These results illustrated the complementary effects of summer green manuring in conjunction with INM in maximizing the yield attributes and yields of rice, its residual effect on succeeding baby corn, and the economics of the system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Green manure and nitrogen levels significantly affected rice yield and the succeeding baby corn crop.

Outcome
rice yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combination of GM and N levels had significant effects on rice yield, which also influenced the succeeding baby corn crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–606 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)–Baby Corn (Zea mays L.) Cropping System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesbania aculeata incorporation at 45 DAS gave higher rice yield attributes and yields, statistically on par with water hyacinth.

Treatment
Sesbania aculeata incorporated at 45 DASe0
Outcome
number of tillers/m2, panicle length (cm), number of grains/panicles, panicle weight (g), grain yield (Mg/ha), straw yield (Mg/ha), and biological yield (Mg/ha)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
water hyacinth 5 t/ha dry weight basise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A higher number of tillers/m2, panicle length (cm), number of grains/panicles, panicle weight (g), grain yield (Mg/ha), straw yield (Mg/ha), and biological yield (Mg/ha) were found with Sesbania aculeata incorporated at 45 DAS (SA), which was statistically on par with water hyacinth 5 t/ha dry weight basis (WH) during both years of the field study.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% RDN treatment produced the best rice yield attributes and yields.

Treatment
100% RDN (50% N through FYM + 50% N through inorganic)e0
Outcome
YA and yields of ricee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100% RDN (50% N through FYM + 50% N through inorganic) (RDN100) was the best treatment with a corresponding increase in all YA and yields of rice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1145 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green manuring and integrated nitrogen management of rice increased yield attributes and yield of succeeding baby corn.

Taxon
Baby Cornt0
Treatment
green manuring and integrated nitrogen management on ricee0
Outcome
yield attributes and yield of the succeeding baby corne0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“green manuring and integrated nitrogen management on rice sustainably increased the yield attributes and yield of the succeeding baby corn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1473 · show in text ↑
t0

“Baby Corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–46 · show in text ↑

Oryza sativa · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 63 positive, 3 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

Sesbania bispinosa · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

40 papers: 40 positive, 0 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.