Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Organic, Inorganic and Integrated Nutrient Sources on the Yield and Its Attributes of Two Basmati Rice Varieties viz Type-3 and Taraori Grown in Tarai Regions of Uttarakhand India

Dipti Bisarya; D. K. Singh; M. K. Nautiyal; et al.

8
claims
22
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at the organic block of breeder seed production center, G.B.P.U.A&T, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, India during the kharif season of 2015 and 2016 to study the effect of different organic, inorganic and integrated nutrient sources on the growth, yield and yield attributes of two basmati rice varieties. The experiments were laid out in Split plot design replicated thrice with eight treatments as main plots viz., T1: GM+FYM (AWD), T2: Organic (AWD), T3: FYM+VC (AWD), T4: SRI with FYM (AWD), T5: DSR + Soybean (LSI), T6: Organic control (CF), T7: Chemical control (CF), T8: Integrated (CF) and two varieties Type-3 and Taraori in the sub plots. The plant height at maturity was highest in treatment T8 which was at par with T7 in both the years. The organic treatments T1 and T3 were at par with T7 and T8 in terms of productive tillers/m−2, grain weight/panicle and thousand grain weight. However number of filled grains/panicle was non-significant in both the years. The grain yield ranged from 2.63-3.00 t/ha and the treatments T1, T3, T7 and T8 were at par in the in both the years 2015 and 2016. Further the results suggest that the organic manures such as vermicompost, FYM and green manures have equal potential in comparison to chemical and integrated fertilizers for rice production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height at maturity was highest under integrated nutrient treatment T8, at par with chemical control T7, in both years.

Taxon
basmati ricee0
Treatment
Integrated (CF)e6
Outcome
plant height at maturitye1
Direction
higheste1
Qualifier
in both the yearse1
Comparator
Chemical control (CF)e6
Setting
Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, Indiae0

Verbatim

e1

“The plant height at maturity was highest in treatment T8 which was at par with T7 in both the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–773 · show in text ↑
e6

“T1: GM+FYM (AWD), T2: Organic (AWD), T3: FYM+VC (AWD), T4: SRI with FYM (AWD), T5: DSR + Soybean (LSI), T6: Organic control (CF), T7: Chemical control (CF), T8: Integrated (CF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–618 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted at the organic block of breeder seed production center, G.B.P.U.A&T, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, India during the kharif season of 2015 and 2016 to study the effect of different organic, inorganic and integrated nutrient sources on the growth, yield and yield attributes of two basmati rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–329 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic treatment T1 was at par with T7 and T8 in productive tillers, grain weight per panicle and thousand grain weight.

Taxon
basmati ricee0
Treatment
GM+FYM (AWD)e6
Outcome
productive tillers/m−2, grain weight/panicle and thousand grain weighte2
Direction
at pare2
Comparator
T7 and T8e2

Verbatim

e2

“The organic treatments T1 and T3 were at par with T7 and T8 in terms of productive tillers/m−2, grain weight/panicle and thousand grain weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–917 · show in text ↑
e6

“T1: GM+FYM (AWD), T2: Organic (AWD), T3: FYM+VC (AWD), T4: SRI with FYM (AWD), T5: DSR + Soybean (LSI), T6: Organic control (CF), T7: Chemical control (CF), T8: Integrated (CF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–618 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted at the organic block of breeder seed production center, G.B.P.U.A&T, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, India during the kharif season of 2015 and 2016 to study the effect of different organic, inorganic and integrated nutrient sources on the growth, yield and yield attributes of two basmati rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–329 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic treatment T3 was at par with T7 and T8 in productive tillers, grain weight per panicle and thousand grain weight.

Taxon
basmati ricee0
Treatment
FYM+VC (AWD)e6
Outcome
productive tillers/m−2, grain weight/panicle and thousand grain weighte2
Direction
at pare2
Comparator
T7 and T8e2

Verbatim

e2

“The organic treatments T1 and T3 were at par with T7 and T8 in terms of productive tillers/m−2, grain weight/panicle and thousand grain weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–917 · show in text ↑
e6

“T1: GM+FYM (AWD), T2: Organic (AWD), T3: FYM+VC (AWD), T4: SRI with FYM (AWD), T5: DSR + Soybean (LSI), T6: Organic control (CF), T7: Chemical control (CF), T8: Integrated (CF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–618 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted at the organic block of breeder seed production center, G.B.P.U.A&T, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, India during the kharif season of 2015 and 2016 to study the effect of different organic, inorganic and integrated nutrient sources on the growth, yield and yield attributes of two basmati rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–329 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic treatment T1 gave grain yield at par with T7 and T8 in both years.

Taxon
basmati ricee0
Treatment
GM+FYM (AWD)e6
Outcome
grain yielde4
Direction
at pare5
Qualifier
in both the years 2015 and 2016e5
Comparator
T7 and T8e5

Verbatim

e4

“The grain yield ranged from 2.63-3.00 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1040 · show in text ↑
e5

“the treatments T1, T3, T7 and T8 were at par in the in both the years 2015 and 2016”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1128 · show in text ↑
e6

“T1: GM+FYM (AWD), T2: Organic (AWD), T3: FYM+VC (AWD), T4: SRI with FYM (AWD), T5: DSR + Soybean (LSI), T6: Organic control (CF), T7: Chemical control (CF), T8: Integrated (CF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–618 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted at the organic block of breeder seed production center, G.B.P.U.A&T, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, India during the kharif season of 2015 and 2016 to study the effect of different organic, inorganic and integrated nutrient sources on the growth, yield and yield attributes of two basmati rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–329 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic treatment T3 gave grain yield at par with T7 and T8 in both years.

Taxon
basmati ricee0
Treatment
FYM+VC (AWD)e6
Outcome
grain yielde4
Direction
at pare5
Qualifier
in both the years 2015 and 2016e5
Comparator
T7 and T8e5

Verbatim

e4

“The grain yield ranged from 2.63-3.00 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1040 · show in text ↑
e5

“the treatments T1, T3, T7 and T8 were at par in the in both the years 2015 and 2016”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1128 · show in text ↑
e6

“T1: GM+FYM (AWD), T2: Organic (AWD), T3: FYM+VC (AWD), T4: SRI with FYM (AWD), T5: DSR + Soybean (LSI), T6: Organic control (CF), T7: Chemical control (CF), T8: Integrated (CF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–618 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted at the organic block of breeder seed production center, G.B.P.U.A&T, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, India during the kharif season of 2015 and 2016 to study the effect of different organic, inorganic and integrated nutrient sources on the growth, yield and yield attributes of two basmati rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–329 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Number of filled grains per panicle was non-significant under the nutrient sources in both years.

Taxon
basmati ricee0
Treatment
different organic, inorganic and integrated nutrient sourcese0
Outcome
number of filled grains/paniclee3
Direction
non-significante3
Qualifier
in both the yearse3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e3

“However number of filled grains/panicle was non-significant in both the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–996 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted at the organic block of breeder seed production center, G.B.P.U.A&T, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, India during the kharif season of 2015 and 2016 to study the effect of different organic, inorganic and integrated nutrient sources on the growth, yield and yield attributes of two basmati rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–329 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield ranged from 2.63 to 3.00 t/ha across treatments.

Taxon
basmati ricee0
Outcome
grain yielde4
Value
2.63-3.00 t/hae4
Setting
Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, Indiae0

Verbatim

e4

“The grain yield ranged from 2.63-3.00 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1040 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted at the organic block of breeder seed production center, G.B.P.U.A&T, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, India during the kharif season of 2015 and 2016 to study the effect of different organic, inorganic and integrated nutrient sources on the growth, yield and yield attributes of two basmati rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–329 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manures (vermicompost, FYM and green manures) have equal potential to chemical and integrated fertilizers for rice production.

Treatment
vermicompost, FYM and green manurese7
Outcome
rice productione7
Direction
equale7
Comparator
chemical and integrated fertilizerse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“the organic manures such as vermicompost, FYM and green manures have equal potential in comparison to chemical and integrated fertilizers for rice production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1320 · show in text ↑

transgenic · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

102 papers: 81 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 81 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

264 papers in the same direction as this paper · 906 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,167 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

271 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,183 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.