Paper · 2004 · Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science

Integrated Nutrient Management For Sustainable Rice Production

AR Khan; D Chandra; P Nanda; et al.

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
25
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The concerns for sustainable soil productivity and ecological stability in relation to the use of chemical fertilizers have become an important issue. The fertilizer consumption of the nation is 74 kg/ha whereas it is 13 kg/ha in northeastern region (as high as 44.4 kg/ha in Manipur and as low as 1.7 kg/ha in Arunachal Pradesh). The marginal farmers in northeastern region are more than 60% of the farming community who are unable to use the inorganic fertilizer and hence the productivity of rice has been very poor (less than 1 tonne/ha) in the region. Organic manures are reported to enhance the fertilizer efficiency and reduce the requirement of inorganic fertilizers. Traditional green manures (Sesbania aculeate), organic manures (FYM) and problematic weeds (Ipomoea Carnea and Gliricidia maculata) may serve as alternative source of nutrients to the plants and may supplement any chemical fertilizers. Most of the green manure plants contain from 0.3 to 0.8% nitrogen (Khan et al., 2000 Khan AR Ghorai AK Singh SR 2000 Improvement of crop and soil sustainability through green manuring in a rainfed lowland rice ecosystem Agrochimica 44 21 29 [Google Scholar]). Integrating fertilizer nitrogen with legume green manure as alternative source of nutrients can aid development of sustainable agricultural management system. A series of experiments was conducted from 1993 to 1999 for integrated nutrient management by using the different sources of organic manures, green manures and chemical fertilizers and their combinations to study the effect on productivity of rice (cultivars CR-1009 and CR-1018, ‘Gayatri’) under rainfed lowland and varying irrigation regimes. The experiment was conducted during kharif season at Water Technology Deras Research Farm, Mendhasal (Bhubaneswar). Green—manuring with Sesbania aculeata increased rice yield by 7 q/ha. An increase of 3 q/ha was observed in comparison to beushening (Beushening is a cross ploughing in standing water under lowland rice ecosystem when rice plants are approximately 45 days old) without fertilizer and green manure treatment—which is a farmer's practice in this coastal region. Grain yield was higher in continuous submerged (5 ± 2 cm) treatments in comparison to intermittent irrigation (where irrigation was given to a depth of 7 cm and was reflooded after 2 days of disappearance of ponded water) treatments. However, the treatments of inorganic fertilizer (urea) in split dose gave a better yield under intermittent irrigation. Both sources of nitrogen i.e. organic or inorganic or their combination proved better than control (no nitrogen). Application of organic manures like Sesbania aculeate and Ipomoea carnea or their combination with urea was found superior to other green and organic manures. Gliricidia maculata gave higher grain yield in comparison to control (no nitrogen).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesbania aculeata green manure increased rice yield by 7 q/ha.

Treatment
Green—manuring with Sesbania aculeatae0
Outcome
rice yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7 q/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Green—manuring with Sesbania aculeata increased rice yield by 7 q/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1792–1860 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield was 3 q/ha above beushening without fertilizer and green manure.

Treatment
Green—manuring with Sesbania aculeatae1
Outcome
rice yielde1
Direction
increasee0
Value
3 q/hae0
Comparator
beusheninge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An increase of 3 q/ha was observed in comparison to beushening (Beushening is a cross ploughing in standing water under lowland rice ecosystem when rice plants are approximately 45 days old) without fertilizer and green manure treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1862–2098 · show in text ↑
e1

“Green—manuring with Sesbania aculeata increased rice yield by 7 q/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1792–1860 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous submergence gave higher grain yield than intermittent irrigation.

Treatment
continuous submerged (5 ± 2 cm)e0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
intermittent irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield was higher in continuous submerged (5 ± 2 cm) treatments in comparison to intermittent irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2152–2261 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Split-dose urea gave better yield under intermittent irrigation.

Treatment
inorganic fertilizer (urea) in split dosee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
under intermittent irrigatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatments of inorganic fertilizer (urea) in split dose gave a better yield under intermittent irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2395–2504 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic nitrogen was better than no nitrogen.

Treatment
organice0
Outcome
proved bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
control (no nitrogen)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both sources of nitrogen i.e. organic or inorganic or their combination proved better than control (no nitrogen)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2506–2618 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inorganic nitrogen was better than no nitrogen.

Treatment
inorganice0
Outcome
proved bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
control (no nitrogen)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both sources of nitrogen i.e. organic or inorganic or their combination proved better than control (no nitrogen)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2506–2618 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined organic and inorganic nitrogen was better than no nitrogen.

Treatment
their combinatione0
Outcome
proved bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
control (no nitrogen)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both sources of nitrogen i.e. organic or inorganic or their combination proved better than control (no nitrogen)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2506–2618 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesbania aculeate manure was superior to other green and organic manures.

Treatment
Sesbania aculeatee0
Outcome
found superiore0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
other green and organic manurese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of organic manures like Sesbania aculeate and Ipomoea carnea or their combination with urea was found superior to other green and organic manures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2620–2777 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ipomoea carnea manure was superior to other green and organic manures.

Treatment
Ipomoea carneae0
Outcome
found superiore0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
other green and organic manurese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of organic manures like Sesbania aculeate and Ipomoea carnea or their combination with urea was found superior to other green and organic manures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2620–2777 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combination with urea was superior to other green and organic manures.

Treatment
their combination with ureae0
Outcome
found superiore0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
other green and organic manurese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of organic manures like Sesbania aculeate and Ipomoea carnea or their combination with urea was found superior to other green and organic manures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2620–2777 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gliricidia maculata increased grain yield over no nitrogen.

Treatment
Gliricidia maculatae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
control (no nitrogen)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gliricidia maculata gave higher grain yield in comparison to control (no nitrogen)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2779–2861 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–51 · show in text ↑

Sesbania bispinosa · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

40 papers: 40 positive, 0 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

flooding · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

286 papers: 193 positive, 93 negative or no effect

192 papers in the same direction as this paper · 82 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

282 papers more in this group

See all 286 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.