Paper · 2022 · Journal of Integrative Agriculture

Nonphytotoxic copper oxide nanoparticles are powerful “nanoweapons” that trigger resistance in tobacco against the soil-borne fungal pathogen Phytophthora nicotianae

Juan-ni CHEN; Lin-tong WU; Kun SONG; et al.

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
61
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Investigations into the potential application of nanoparticles acting as nanofungicides in sustainable agriculture are rapidly expanding due to the high antimicrobial properties of these compounds, which do not risk inducing pathogen resistance to fungicides. A detailed understanding of the impact of copper oxide nanoparticles (CuO NPs) on soil-borne phytopathogenic fungi is yet to be obtained. This study aimed to explore the in vitro antifungal activity and control efficacy of CuO NPs applied via irrigation with respect to tobacco black shank (TBS) disease caused by Phytophthora nicotianae. The results revealed that CuO NPs greatly interfered with the reproductive growth process of this fungus, repressing hyphal growth, spore germination and sporangium production. Additionally, morphological damage, intracellular ROS accumulation and increased SOD enzyme activity in hyphae were the antifungicidal mechanisms of these NPs. In pot experiments, treatment with CuO NPs at 100 mg L-1 significantly suppressed TBS development, compared with the effect on control plants, and the control efficacy reached 33.69% without inducing phytotoxicity. Exposure to CuO NPs significantly activated a series of defense enzymes, and resistance genes in tobacco can further explain the mechanisms by which CuO NPs suppressed fungal infection. The Cu content in both the leaves and roots of P. nicotianae-infested plants increased by 50.03 and 27.25%, respectively, after treatment with 100 mg L-1 CuO NPs, compared with that of healthy plants. In particular, a higher Cu content was observed in infected roots than in leaves. Therefore, this study showed the potential of CuO NPs applied as nanofungicides and as nanoinducers of fungus resistance genes for the management of TBS through inhibition of pathogen infection and stimulation of plant defenses.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CuO nanoparticles repressed Phytophthora nicotianae hyphal growth.

Treatment
CuO NPse0
Interactor
Phytophthora nicotianaePhytophthora nicotianaet0pathogene0
Outcome
hyphal growthe0
Direction
repressinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora nicotianae
Phytophthora nicotianae · InteractorSupattra Intavimolsri Department of Agriculture, Thailand · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CuO NPs greatly interfered with the reproductive growth process of this fungus, repressing hyphal growth, spore germination and sporangium production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–774 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco against the soil-borne fungal pathogen Phytophthora nicotianae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–165 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CuO nanoparticles repressed Phytophthora nicotianae spore germination.

Treatment
CuO NPse0
Interactor
Phytophthora nicotianaePhytophthora nicotianaet0pathogene0
Outcome
spore germinatione0
Direction
repressinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora nicotianae
Phytophthora nicotianae · InteractorSupattra Intavimolsri Department of Agriculture, Thailand · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CuO NPs greatly interfered with the reproductive growth process of this fungus, repressing hyphal growth, spore germination and sporangium production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–774 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco against the soil-borne fungal pathogen Phytophthora nicotianae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–165 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CuO nanoparticles repressed Phytophthora nicotianae sporangium production.

Treatment
CuO NPse0
Interactor
Phytophthora nicotianaePhytophthora nicotianaet0pathogene0
Outcome
sporangium productione0
Direction
repressinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora nicotianae
Phytophthora nicotianae · InteractorSupattra Intavimolsri Department of Agriculture, Thailand · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CuO NPs greatly interfered with the reproductive growth process of this fungus, repressing hyphal growth, spore germination and sporangium production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–774 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco against the soil-borne fungal pathogen Phytophthora nicotianae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–165 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CuO nanoparticles significantly suppressed tobacco black shank development with 33.69% efficacy.

Treatment
CuO NPs at 100 mg L-1e0
Outcome
TBS developmente0
Direction
suppressede0
Value
33.69%e0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment with CuO NPs at 100 mg L-1 significantly suppressed TBS development, compared with the effect on control plants, and the control efficacy reached 33.69% without inducing phytotoxicity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1149 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–102 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CuO nanoparticle treatment did not induce tobacco phytotoxicity.

Outcome
without inducing phytotoxicitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“without inducing phytotoxicity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1149 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CuO nanoparticle exposure significantly activated tobacco defense enzymes.

Treatment
CuO NPse0
Outcome
defense enzymese0
Direction
activatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exposure to CuO NPs significantly activated a series of defense enzymes, and resistance genes in tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1255 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CuO nanoparticle exposure significantly activated tobacco resistance genes.

Treatment
CuO NPse0
Outcome
resistance genese0
Direction
activatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exposure to CuO NPs significantly activated a series of defense enzymes, and resistance genes in tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1255 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cu in leaves of infected treated plants increased 50.03% relative to healthy plants.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
100 mg L-1 CuO NPse0
Interactor
P. nicotianaePhytophthora nicotianaee0pathogen
Outcome
Cu contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
50.03e0
Comparator
healthy plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora nicotianae
Phytophthora nicotianae · InteractorSupattra Intavimolsri Department of Agriculture, Thailand · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Cu content in both the leaves and roots of P. nicotianae-infested plants increased by 50.03 and 27.25%, respectively, after treatment with 100 mg L-1 CuO NPs, compared with that of healthy plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1337–1536 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–102 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cu in roots of infected treated plants increased 27.25% relative to healthy plants.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
100 mg L-1 CuO NPse0
Interactor
P. nicotianaePhytophthora nicotianaee0pathogen
Outcome
Cu contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
27.25%e0
Comparator
healthy plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora nicotianae
Phytophthora nicotianae · InteractorSupattra Intavimolsri Department of Agriculture, Thailand · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Cu content in both the leaves and roots of P. nicotianae-infested plants increased by 50.03 and 27.25%, respectively, after treatment with 100 mg L-1 CuO NPs, compared with that of healthy plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1337–1536 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–102 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infected roots had more copper than leaves.

Organ / stage
infected rootse0
Outcome
Cu contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a higher Cu content was observed in infected roots than in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1553–1618 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–102 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · growth · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nanoparticle · molecular: expression · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.