Paper · 2022 · International Journal of Agronomy

Post-Veraison Water Stress and Pruning Level on Merlot Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.): Effects on Berry Development and Composition

Dargie Tsegay Berhe

16
claims
32
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The grapevine berry development and composition at harvest are major determinant of productivity and wine quality. The increase in grapevine productivity by applying proper pruning and watering may affect fruit traits of the grapevine development notably berry size, weight, and volume as well as the berry composition mainly the total soluble solids (TSSs), titratable acidity (TA), pH of the grapes, total anthocyanins, and phenolic content and concentration. In this context, this study aimed to explore the response of berry development and composition to the interactive effect of pruning level and post-veraison water stress. Four pruning levels (severe, standard, light, and minimal) in combination with four post-veraison water stresses (none, light, moderate, and intense) were tested. The interactive effect of pruning level and post-veraison water stress has significantly altered all parameters, except berry weight which was influenced by the main effect of the two factors. Generally, post-veraison water stress reduced berry volume, weight, yield, and TA, but increased the TSS, pH, total anthocyanins, and phenols. Increasing in the pruning level also reduced berry yield per vine, TSS, and pH, but increased the berry volume, weight, TA, total anthocyanins, and phenols. Specifically, the highest berry volume, weight, and TA were registered in severely pruned grapevines with adequate water supply. Conversely, the minimally pruned grapevines with intense water stress had the highest TSS and pH of grape juice. The total anthocyanins and phenols were advanced by the increment from minimal to severe pruning levels but depressed when the water stress extended from none to an intense level. In the other hand, the maximum total anthocyanins and phenols in terms of concentration and content were observed in severely pruned grapevines under intense water stress. Interestingly, higher berry yield per grapevine was scored in minimally pruned grapevines with adequate water supply, possibly due to the increased number of nodes per vine. TSS had a strong negative relationship with berry volume, weight, yield, and TA, while pH had a strong positive relationship with TSS. Total anthocyanins and phenols were also inversely correlated with berry yield per grapevine. The results showed that the combined effect of pruning levels and water stress is a powerful tool to balance berry development and composition. As Merlot is a typical red wine grapevine, it is important to increase the berry composition even though there could be a reduction in its berry development variables including berry yield per vine.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-veraison water stress reduced berry volume, weight and yield in Merlot grapevine.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Material
Merlott0
Treatment
post-veraison water stresse1
Outcome
berry volume, weight, yielde1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Merlot Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“post-veraison water stress reduced berry volume, weight, yield, and TA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1069 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-veraison water stress reduced titratable acidity (TA) of Merlot grape berries.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Material
Merlott0
Treatment
post-veraison water stresse1
Outcome
TAe1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Merlot Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“post-veraison water stress reduced berry volume, weight, yield, and TA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1069 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-veraison water stress increased total soluble solids (TSS) and pH of Merlot grape berries.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Material
Merlott0
Treatment
post-veraison water stresse1
Outcome
TSS, pHe1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Merlot Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“post-veraison water stress reduced berry volume, weight, yield, and TA, but increased the TSS, pH, total anthocyanins, and phenols”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-veraison water stress increased total anthocyanins and phenols of Merlot grape berries.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Material
Merlott0
Treatment
post-veraison water stresse1
Outcome
total anthocyanins, and phenolse1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Merlot Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“post-veraison water stress reduced berry volume, weight, yield, and TA, but increased the TSS, pH, total anthocyanins, and phenols”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing the pruning level reduced berry yield per vine, TSS and pH.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Material
Merlott0
Treatment
Increasing in the pruning levele1
Outcome
berry yield per vine, TSS, and pHe1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Merlot Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing in the pruning level also reduced berry yield per vine, TSS, and pH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1209 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing the pruning level increased berry volume, weight and TA.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Material
Merlott0
Treatment
Increasing in the pruning levele1
Outcome
berry volume, weight, TAe1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Merlot Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing in the pruning level also reduced berry yield per vine, TSS, and pH, but increased the berry volume, weight, TA, total anthocyanins, and phenols”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1286 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing the pruning level increased total anthocyanins and phenols.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Material
Merlott0
Treatment
Increasing in the pruning levele1
Outcome
total anthocyanins, and phenolse1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Merlot Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing in the pruning level also reduced berry yield per vine, TSS, and pH, but increased the berry volume, weight, TA, total anthocyanins, and phenols”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1286 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest berry volume, weight and TA were found in severely pruned grapevines with adequate water supply.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Material
Merlott0
Treatment
severely pruned grapevines with adequate water supplye1
Outcome
berry volume, weight, and TAe1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Merlot Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest berry volume, weight, and TA were registered in severely pruned grapevines with adequate water supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1415 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimally pruned grapevines under intense water stress had the highest TSS and pH of grape juice.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Material
Merlott0
Treatment
minimally pruned grapevines with intense water stresse1
Outcome
TSS and pH of grape juicee1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Merlot Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“the minimally pruned grapevines with intense water stress had the highest TSS and pH of grape juice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1429–1528 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum total anthocyanins and phenols, in concentration and content, were observed in severely pruned grapevines under intense water stress.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Material
Merlott0
Treatment
severely pruned grapevines under intense water stresse1
Outcome
total anthocyanins and phenolse1
Direction
maximume1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Merlot Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“the maximum total anthocyanins and phenols in terms of concentration and content were observed in severely pruned grapevines under intense water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1729–1880 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Berry yield per grapevine was higher in minimally pruned grapevines with adequate water supply, possibly due to a larger number of nodes per vine.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Material
Merlott0
Treatment
minimally pruned grapevines with adequate water supplye1
Outcome
berry yield per grapevinee1
Direction
highere1
Qualifier
possibly due to the increased number of nodes per vinee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Merlot Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“higher berry yield per grapevine was scored in minimally pruned grapevines with adequate water supply, possibly due to the increased number of nodes per vine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1897–2054 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interactive effect of pruning level and post-veraison water stress significantly altered all measured parameters except berry weight, which responded to the main effects of the two factors.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Material
Merlott0
Treatment
interactive effect of pruning level and post-veraison water stresse1
Outcome
all parameterse1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Merlot Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“The interactive effect of pruning level and post-veraison water stress has significantly altered all parameters, except berry weight which was influenced by the main effect of the two factors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–986 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TSS had a strong negative relationship with berry volume, weight, yield and TA.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Material
Merlott0
Outcome
TSSe1
Direction
negative relationshipe1
Qualifier
berry volume, weight, yield, and TAe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Merlot Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“TSS had a strong negative relationship with berry volume, weight, yield, and TA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2056–2135 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

pH had a strong positive relationship with TSS.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Material
Merlott0
Outcome
pHe1
Direction
positive relationshipe1
Qualifier
TSSe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Merlot Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“pH had a strong positive relationship with TSS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2143–2189 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total anthocyanins and phenols were inversely correlated with berry yield per grapevine.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Material
Merlott0
Outcome
Total anthocyanins and phenolse1
Direction
inversely correlatede1
Qualifier
berry yield per grapevinee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Merlot Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“Total anthocyanins and phenols were also inversely correlated with berry yield per grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2191–2283 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that combining pruning levels and water stress is a powerful tool to balance berry development and composition.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Material
Merlott0
Outcome
balance berry development and compositione1
Direction
powerful toole1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Merlot Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“the combined effect of pruning levels and water stress is a powerful tool to balance berry development and composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2309–2427 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results differ

19 papers: 3 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

irrigation · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 24 positive, 17 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

pruning · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

95 papers: 41 positive, 54 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.