Paper · 2022 · Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection

Field evaluation of microbial insecticides against fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (smith) and corn earworm, helicoverpa zea (boddie) (lepidoptera: Noctuidae), in maize

Walther J. Torres-Cab; Esau Ruiz-Sanchez; Arturo Reyes-Ramírez; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Commercial formulations of two entomopathogenic fungi (Metarhizium anisopliae Metschnikoff and Beauveria bassiana Balsamo) and two strains of Bacillus thuringiensis (B. thuringiensis var. kurstaki and B. thuringiensis var. aizawai) were evaluated against S. frugiperda and H. zea in two fields in the Yucatan Peninsula. In both locations, M. anisopliae and B. bassiana had similar efficacy (Davis and Williams scale for final damage of 1.2–1.3 at Becal and 1.7–2.6 at Muna) to that of emamectin benzoate (damage level 1.4 in Becal and 2.0 in Muna) on suppressing leaf damage by S. frugiperda. These fungal-based insecticides also caused a decrease in the ear damage by H. zea. Grain yield of plots treated with these fungal-based insecticides (5900–7500 kg ha−1) was similar to that treated with emamectin benzoate (7400–7500 kg ha−1).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M. anisopliae had similar efficacy to emamectin benzoate against S. frugiperda leaf damage.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
M. anisopliaee0
Interactor
S. frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdae0pest
Second interactor
M. anisopliaeMetarhizium anisopliaee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
leaf damage by S. frugiperdae0
Direction
similar efficacye0
Value
1.2–1.3e0
Comparator
emamectin benzoatee0
Setting
Becale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Metarhizium anisopliae
Metarhizium anisopliae · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryChengshu Wang and Yuxian Xia · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both locations, M. anisopliae and B. bassiana had similar efficacy (Davis and Williams scale for final damage of 1.2–1.3 at Becal and 1.7–2.6 at Muna) to that of emamectin benzoate (damage level 1.4 in Becal and 2.0 in Muna) on suppressing leaf damage by S. frugiperda.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–592 · show in text ↑
t0

“in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 165–173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. bassiana had similar efficacy to emamectin benzoate against S. frugiperda leaf damage.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
B. bassianae0
Interactor
S. frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdae0pest
Second interactor
B. bassianaBeauveria bassianae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
leaf damage by S. frugiperdae0
Direction
similar efficacye0
Value
1.2–1.3e0
Comparator
emamectin benzoatee0
Setting
Becale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Beauveria bassiana
Beauveria bassiana · Second interactorBealeiderman · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both locations, M. anisopliae and B. bassiana had similar efficacy (Davis and Williams scale for final damage of 1.2–1.3 at Becal and 1.7–2.6 at Muna) to that of emamectin benzoate (damage level 1.4 in Becal and 2.0 in Muna) on suppressing leaf damage by S. frugiperda.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–592 · show in text ↑
t0

“in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 165–173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal insecticides decreased H. zea ear damage.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
fungal-based insecticidese0
Interactor
H. zeae0pest
Outcome
ear damage by H. zeae0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These fungal-based insecticides also caused a decrease in the ear damage by H. zea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–676 · show in text ↑
t0

“in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 165–173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield under fungal insecticides was similar to emamectin benzoate.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
fungal-based insecticidese0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
similare0
Value
5900–7500 kg ha−1e0
Qualifier
7400–7500 kg ha−1e0
Comparator
emamectin benzoatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield of plots treated with these fungal-based insecticides (5900–7500 kg ha−1) was similar to that treated with emamectin benzoate (7400–7500 kg ha−1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–835 · show in text ↑
t0

“in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 165–173 · show in text ↑

Beauveria bassiana · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Metarhizium anisopliae · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

insecticide · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

62 papers: 48 positive, 14 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

58 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.