Paper · 2022 · Vestnik of Kazan state agrarin university

INFLUENCE OF BIOTRAN ON THE PRODUCTIVITY AND QUALITY OF SPRING WHEAT GRAIN IN THE MIDDLE VOLGA REGION

Galina Saydyasheva; Kseniya Zayceva

8
claims
20
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An experiment to study the effect of plant growth regulators Biotran and Energia M on spring wheat yield was carried out in Ulyanovsk region at the experimental site of Ulyanovsk Research Institute of Agriculture - a branch of the Samsra Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences in 2019-2021. The influence of the studied preparations on the yield data and quality indicators of spring wheat grain was studied. It was established that the use of growth regulators studied in the experiment had a positive effect on the grain yield and its quality. The effective doses of the studied preparations were determined. The following were used in the experiment: growth stimulants - Energy M (standard), Biotran and a complex mineral fertilizer (Azofoska at a dose of 15 kg AI). Spring wheat cultivar Simbirtsit was sown as the studied crop. The soil of the experimental plot is represented by leached, heavy loamy chernozem. The scheme of the experiment involved the study of the following options: mineral fertilizers (factor A) - without fertilizers (0), azophoska during sowing (N15P15K15); growth regulators for pre-sowing treatment of seeds and single treatment of vegetative plants (factor B) - without treatment (0), Energy M (standard) 4 g/t + 10.0 g/ha, Biotran 5 g/t + 5.0 g/ha ha, Biotran 5 g/t + 10.0 g/ha. Pre-sowing treatment of seeds was carried out manually by the method of semidry dressing the day before sowing, with dosages recommended by the manufacturer. Spraying was carried out manually with a knapsack sprayer during the budding phase of spring wheat. The results of the research found that the increase in spring wheat yield was the largest in the variant with the use of the Biotran growth regulator at a dosage of 5 g/t (presowing seed treatment) + 10 g/ha (spraying) in all years of the experiment. On average, for three years in this variant, the yield was 1.85 t/ha against the background without the use of fertilizers and 1.94 t/ha against the fertilized background. Under the influence of the studied growth regulators, the technological and biochemical parameters of grain improved: the protein content in the grain increased by 0.3-1.4%, gluten by 0.2-1.9%, nature by 1-12 g/l.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth regulators improved spring wheat grain yield.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
growth regulatorse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
positive effecte0
Setting
Ulyanovsk regione1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of growth regulators studied in the experiment had a positive effect on the grain yield and its quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–558 · show in text ↑
t0

“SPRING WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring wheat yield was carried out in Ulyanovsk region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 86–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth regulators improved spring wheat grain quality.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
growth regulatorse0
Outcome
qualitye0
Direction
positive effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of growth regulators studied in the experiment had a positive effect on the grain yield and its quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–558 · show in text ↑
t0

“SPRING WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biotran at 5 g/t seed treatment plus 10 g/ha spray produced the largest yield increase across years.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
Biotran growth regulator at a dosage of 5 g/t (presowing seed treatment) + 10 g/ha (spraying)e0
Outcome
spring wheat yielde0
Direction
largeste0
Qualifier
all years of the experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the increase in spring wheat yield was the largest in the variant with the use of the Biotran growth regulator at a dosage of 5 g/t (presowing seed treatment) + 10 g/ha (spraying) in all years of the experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1622–1832 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

This Biotran regimen yielded 1.85 t/ha without fertilizer.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
yielde0
Value
1.85 t/hae0
Qualifier
without the use of fertilizerse0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yield was 1.85 t/ha against the background without the use of fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1879–1956 · show in text ↑
t0

“SPRING WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

This Biotran regimen yielded 1.94 t/ha with fertilizer.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
yielde1
Value
1.94 t/hae0
Qualifier
fertilized backgrounde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1.94 t/ha against the fertilized background”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1961–2004 · show in text ↑
t0

“SPRING WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“the yield was 1.85 t/ha against the background without the use of fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1879–1956 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth regulators increased grain protein by 0.3–1.4%.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
studied growth regulatorse1
Outcome
protein content in the graine0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.3-1.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the protein content in the grain increased by 0.3-1.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2124–2178 · show in text ↑
t0

“SPRING WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under the influence of the studied growth regulators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2006–2058 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth regulators increased grain gluten by 0.2–1.9%.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
studied growth regulatorse1
Outcome
glutene0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
0.2-1.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“gluten by 0.2-1.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2180–2198 · show in text ↑
t0

“SPRING WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under the influence of the studied growth regulators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2006–2058 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth regulators increased grain nature by 1–12 g/l.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
studied growth regulatorse1
Outcome
naturee0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
1-12 g/le0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nature by 1-12 g/l”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2200–2218 · show in text ↑
t0

“SPRING WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under the influence of the studied growth regulators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2006–2058 · show in text ↑

class · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

class · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

117 papers: 100 positive, 17 negative or no effect

99 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

113 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

301 papers: 270 positive, 31 negative or no effect

269 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

297 papers more in this group

See all 301 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

class · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.