Paper · 1971 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Hastening the Fruiting of Apple Seedlings1

Roger D. Way

14
claims
26
verbatim quotes
15
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract An analysis of the initial fruiting in nearly 50,000 apple seedlings grown over a 29-year period showed that 12% had fruited by their 8th year from seed. For 18 carefully studied crosses, 82% of the seedlings had flowered by their 11th year. Parent cultivars producing the most precocious progenies were ‘Fyan’, ‘Haralson’, ‘Red Melba’, ‘Golden Delicious’, and ‘Idared’. Early fruiting of seedlings was enhanced by large seedling size and wide spacing in the row, but season of transplanting had no significant effect. Fruiting of apple seedlings was hastened by 2 methods of trunk ringing: scoring with a knife or saw and spraying trunks with 2- sec -butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol (Dow General). Ringing caused precocious bearing in 4-year-old seedlings but 3-year-old seedlings were too young to be stimulated by ringing and a large portion of 5-year-old seedlings bore without ringing. Seedling fruiting was advanced about 1¼ years by grafting onto established 10-year-old trees having M.IX roots. This small advance was not enough to justify the considerable effort required to do the grafting. The presence of a fruiting branch of the stock tree did not hasten fruiting of seedling scions grafted onto the stock tree.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twelve percent of seedlings fruited by year eight.

Outcome
fruited by their 8th yeare0
Value
12%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“12% had fruited by their 8th year from seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–161 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eighty two percent of seedlings in 18 crosses flowered by year eleven.

Outcome
flowered by their 11th yeare0
Value
82%e0
Qualifier
18 carefully studied crossese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For 18 carefully studied crosses, 82% of the seedlings had flowered by their 11th year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–249 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five named parent cultivars produced the most precocious progeny.

Material
‘Fyan’, ‘Haralson’, ‘Red Melba’, ‘Golden Delicious’, and ‘Idared’e0
Outcome
most precocious progeniese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Parent cultivars producing the most precocious progenies were ‘Fyan’, ‘Haralson’, ‘Red Melba’, ‘Golden Delicious’, and ‘Idared’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–378 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Large seedling size enhanced early fruiting.

Material
large seedling sizee0
Outcome
Early fruitinge0
Direction
enhancede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Early fruiting of seedlings was enhanced by large seedling size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–443 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wide row spacing enhanced early fruiting.

Treatment
wide spacing in the rowe0
Outcome
Early fruitinge0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Early fruiting of seedlings was enhanced by large seedling size and wide spacing in the row”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–471 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplanting season had no significant effect on early fruiting.

Treatment
season of transplantinge0
Outcome
Fruitingt0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“season of transplanting had no significant effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–526 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fruiting of Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trunk scoring hastened fruiting.

Treatment
scoring with a knife or sawe0
Outcome
Fruitinge0
Direction
hastenede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruiting of apple seedlings was hastened by 2 methods of trunk ringing: scoring with a knife or saw and spraying trunks with 2- sec -butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol (Dow General)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–698 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trunk spraying with Dow General hastened fruiting.

Treatment
spraying trunks with 2- sec -butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol (Dow General)e0
Outcome
Fruitinge0
Direction
hastenede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruiting of apple seedlings was hastened by 2 methods of trunk ringing: scoring with a knife or saw and spraying trunks with 2- sec -butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol (Dow General)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–698 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ringing induced precocious bearing in four year old seedlings.

Treatment
Ringinge0
Outcome
precocious bearinge0
Qualifier
4-year-old seedlingse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ringing caused precocious bearing in 4-year-old seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–757 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three year old seedlings were too young to respond to ringing.

Treatment
ringinge0
Outcome
too young to be stimulatede0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“3-year-old seedlings were too young to be stimulated by ringing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–825 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Many five year old seedlings bore without ringing.

Outcome
bore without ringinge0
Qualifier
5-year-old seedlingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a large portion of 5-year-old seedlings bore without ringing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–890 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting advanced fruiting about 1¼ years.

Treatment
grafting onto established 10-year-old trees having M.IX rootse0
Outcome
Seedling fruitinge0
Direction
advancede0
Value
1¼ yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedling fruiting was advanced about 1¼ years by grafting onto established 10-year-old trees having M.IX roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1002 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors judged grafting effort unjustified by the small advance.

Outcome
not enough to justify the considerable effort required to do the graftinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This small advance was not enough to justify the considerable effort required to do the grafting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1100 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A fruiting branch on the stock tree did not hasten scion fruiting.

Treatment
presence of a fruiting branch of the stock treee0
Outcome
fruiting of seedling scionse0
Direction
did not hastene0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The presence of a fruiting branch of the stock tree did not hasten fruiting of seedling scions grafted onto the stock tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1224 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑

grafting · phenology · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

application · phenology · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 10 positive, 6 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

climate site · phenology · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.