Abstract
Authors investigated the expression of the primigenic dominance in the flowering and fruit from open and self pollination of four apple cultivars ('Gala Royal', 'Golden Smoothee', Pink Lady' and 'Vista Bella') during two consecutive years in Western Hungary on three different growth inducing rootstocks (M. 9, MM. 106 and seedling). There were not significant differences in the effect of the rootstocks on the flowering order in a flower cluster. Significant difference in the fruit set in open pollination was found among individual flowers in a cluster, mostly between the king bloom and the second flower. The rate of the fruit set from self-pollination was very low without any significant difference among individual flowers in the cluster.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Rootstocks did not significantly differ in their effect on flowering order within a cluster.
- Taxon
- apple cultivars
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- rootstockse0
- Outcome
- flowering order in a flower clustere0
- Direction
- not significant differencese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There were not significant differences in the effect of the rootstocks on the flowering order in a flower cluster.”
t0“apple cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit set under open pollination differed significantly among flowers in a cluster, mainly king bloom versus second flower.
- Taxon
- apple cultivarsMalus domesticat0
- Organ / stage
- king bloome0
- Outcome
- fruit set in open pollinatione0
- Comparator
- second flowere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Significant difference in the fruit set in open pollination was found among individual flowers in a cluster, mostly between the king bloom and the second flower.”
t0“apple cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit set from self-pollination was very low.
- Taxon
- apple cultivarsMalus domesticat0
- Outcome
- rate of the fruit set from self-pollinatione0
- Direction
- very lowe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The rate of the fruit set from self-pollination was very low without any significant difference among individual flowers in the cluster.”
t0“apple cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Self-pollinated fruit set did not differ significantly among flowers in a cluster.
- Taxon
- apple cultivarsMalus domesticat0
- Outcome
- difference among individual flowers in the clustere0
- Direction
- without any significant differencee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“without any significant difference among individual flowers in the cluster.”
t0“apple cultivars”
The same questions in other papers
grafting · phenology · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.