Paper · 2022 · International Journal of Agronomy

Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) Response to Deficit Irrigation and Nitrogen Fertilizer and Relationships between Yield, Yield Component, and Protein Content

Melaku Fisseha Teferi; Bizuayehu Tesfaye; Abraham Woldemichael; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted at Adami Tulu, Ethiopia, for two successive dry seasons to investigate how nitrogen levels and deficit irrigation affect the yield and its related components, and the protein content of snap beans. The treatments were deficit irrigation with three levels (50, 75, and 100% ETc) and application of nitrogen with four levels (0, 46, 92, and 138 kg·N·ha−1), which were set up as split-plot arrangement, with irrigation being as the main plot and nitrogen levels as subplot, replicated thrice. Results showed that the pod yield had a substantial impact ( <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M1"><a:mi>p</a:mi><a:mo><</a:mo><a:mn>0.01</a:mn></a:math> ) on the interaction between the two factors; i.e., interaction of 100% ETc and 92 kg nitrogen levels per hectare recorded the highest pod yield (22.69 t·ha−1), but treatment combinations of 50% ETc and no nitrogen application produced the lowest amount of overall pod yield (6.922 tons per hectare). However, the results showed that the application of 75% ETc in combination with 92 kg nitrogen per hectare recorded the highest protein concentration (17.718%) but statistically equivalent to 138 kg nitrogen per hectare combined with the same deficit irrigation level, while the lowest protein concentration (12.24%) was recorded at 50 ETc combined with no fertilizer. Hence, the use of 75% ETc along with 92 kg nitrogen levels per hectare could be optimal in balancing quality and pod output of green beans at Adami Tulu and surrounding areas.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation and nitrogen interaction significantly affected pod yield.

Taxon
snap beanse2
Treatment
100% ETc and 92 kg nitrogen levels per hectaree0
Outcome
pod yielde1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“the interaction between the two factors; i.e., interaction of 100% ETc and 92 kg nitrogen levels per hectare recorded the highest pod yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–844 · show in text ↑
e1

“the pod yield had a substantial impact”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–581 · show in text ↑
e2

“snap beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full irrigation plus 92 kg nitrogen per hectare gave the highest pod yield, 22.69 t·ha−1.

Taxon
snap beanse1
Treatment
100% ETc and 92 kg nitrogen levels per hectaree0
Outcome
pod yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
22.69 t·ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“interaction of 100% ETc and 92 kg nitrogen levels per hectare recorded the highest pod yield (22.69 t·ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–859 · show in text ↑
e1

“snap beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Half irrigation without nitrogen gave the lowest pod yield, 6.922 tons per hectare.

Taxon
snap beanse1
Treatment
50% ETc and no nitrogen applicatione0
Outcome
overall pod yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Value
6.922 tons per hectaree0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“50% ETc and no nitrogen application produced the lowest amount of overall pod yield (6.922 tons per hectare)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–999 · show in text ↑
e1

“snap beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 75% ETc, 92 kg nitrogen per hectare gave the highest protein concentration, 17.718%.

Taxon
snap beanse1
Treatment
75% ETc in combination with 92 kg nitrogen per hectaree0
Outcome
protein concentratione0
Direction
higheste0
Value
17.718%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“75% ETc in combination with 92 kg nitrogen per hectare recorded the highest protein concentration (17.718%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1160 · show in text ↑
e1

“snap beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% ETc plus 138 kg nitrogen treatment was statistically equivalent for protein concentration.

Taxon
snap beanse2
Treatment
138 kg nitrogen per hectare combined with the same deficit irrigation levele0
Outcome
protein concentratione1
Direction
statistically equivalente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“statistically equivalent to 138 kg nitrogen per hectare combined with the same deficit irrigation level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1268 · show in text ↑
e1

“protein concentration (17.718%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1160 · show in text ↑
e2

“snap beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Half ETc without fertilizer gave the lowest protein concentration, 12.24%.

Taxon
snap beanse1
Treatment
50 ETc combined with no fertilizere0
Outcome
protein concentratione0
Direction
loweste0
Value
12.24%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest protein concentration (12.24%) was recorded at 50 ETc combined with no fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1369 · show in text ↑
e1

“snap beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–229 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 75% ETc plus 92 kg nitrogen per hectare to balance quality and pod output.

Taxon
green beanse0
Treatment
75% ETc along with 92 kg nitrogen levels per hectaree0
Outcome
balancing quality and pod outpute0
Setting
Adami Tulue0

Verbatim

e0

“the use of 75% ETc along with 92 kg nitrogen levels per hectare could be optimal in balancing quality and pod output of green beans at Adami Tulu and surrounding areas.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1545 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: protein · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 25 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

156 papers: 131 positive, 25 negative or no effect

130 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

152 papers more in this group

See all 156 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.