Paper · 2014 · International Journal of Agriculture and Biology

Influence of organic nitrogen on the snap bean grown in sandy soil.

M. N. Feleafel; Zohair Mahmoud Mirdad

9
claims
13
verbatim quotes
21
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Reverse all the legumes crops, the nitrogen (N) fertilizer requirement of snap bean plant is high, due to it is weak in the fixation of atmospheric N. Using organic fertilizers; chicken manure and biofertilizer, can serve as an alternative to use mineral N fertilizer. Two greenhouse experiments were carried out in factorial randomized complete block design with three replicates. Each experiment included eight treatments; four rates of chicken manure (CM) as a source of organic N; 0 (CM0), 50 (CM1), 100 (CM2) and 200 (CM3) kg N ha -1 applied singly or in combined with biofertilizer (Halex-2). The application of CM2, significantly, increased the number of leaves and branches, leaf area index and pods number per plant, as well as pods yield, dry mass and N uptake ha -1 compared with CM0. Moreover, inoculating seed of snap bean by biofertilizer significantly increased all studied parameters of snap bean plants. The dry matter and N uptake were mainly distributed in pods, followed by leaves, and stems. The pods yield of snap bean plants was highly positively correlated with the number of branches and leaves, leaf area index, flower clusters number, dry mass, number of green pods, pod weight and N uptake characters, orderly. Generally, the best significant vigorous of the growth and yield traits of snap bean plants, was achieved with the dual treatment of CM2 (100 kg N ha -1 ) and inoculate the seed with biofertilizer, which considered as one of the effective agriculture practices in organic farming and environmentally safe procedure. © 2014 Friends Science Publishers

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CM2 increased leaves, branches and leaf area index versus CM0.

Taxon
snap beant0
Treatment
CM2e0
Outcome
number of leaves and branches, leaf area indexe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
CM0e0

Verbatim

e0

“The application of CM2, significantly, increased the number of leaves and branches, leaf area index and pods number per plant, as well as pods yield, dry mass and N uptake ha -1 compared with CM0.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–795 · show in text ↑
t0

“snap bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CM2 increased pod number, pod yield and dry mass versus CM0.

Taxon
snap beant0
Treatment
CM2e0
Outcome
pods number per plant, as well as pods yield, dry masse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
CM0e0

Verbatim

e0

“The application of CM2, significantly, increased the number of leaves and branches, leaf area index and pods number per plant, as well as pods yield, dry mass and N uptake ha -1 compared with CM0.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–795 · show in text ↑
t0

“snap bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CM2 increased nitrogen uptake versus CM0.

Taxon
snap beant0
Treatment
CM2e0
Outcome
N uptake ha -1e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
CM0e0

Verbatim

e0

“The application of CM2, significantly, increased the number of leaves and branches, leaf area index and pods number per plant, as well as pods yield, dry mass and N uptake ha -1 compared with CM0.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–795 · show in text ↑
t0

“snap bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer seed inoculation increased all studied snap bean parameters.

Taxon
snap beane0
Treatment
inoculating seed of snap bean by biofertilizere0
Outcome
all studied parameterse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“inoculating seed of snap bean by biofertilizer significantly increased all studied parameters of snap bean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–919 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter and nitrogen uptake were mainly in pods, followed by leaves and stems.

Taxon
snap beant0
Organ / stage
podse0
Outcome
dry matter and N uptakee0

Verbatim

e0

“The dry matter and N uptake were mainly distributed in pods, followed by leaves, and stems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1012 · show in text ↑
t0

“snap bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–46 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod yield was highly positively correlated with branches, leaves and leaf area index.

Taxon
snap beane0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
pods yielde0
Direction
positively correlatede0

Verbatim

e0

“The pods yield of snap bean plants was highly positively correlated with the number of branches and leaves, leaf area index, flower clusters number, dry mass, number of green pods, pod weight and N uptake characters, orderly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1238 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod yield was highly positively correlated with flower clusters, dry mass and green pod number.

Taxon
snap beane0
Organ / stage
flower clusterse0
Outcome
pods yielde0
Direction
positively correlatede0

Verbatim

e0

“The pods yield of snap bean plants was highly positively correlated with the number of branches and leaves, leaf area index, flower clusters number, dry mass, number of green pods, pod weight and N uptake characters, orderly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1238 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod yield was highly positively correlated with pod weight and nitrogen uptake.

Taxon
snap beane0
Organ / stage
pode0
Outcome
pods yielde0
Direction
positively correlatede0

Verbatim

e0

“The pods yield of snap bean plants was highly positively correlated with the number of branches and leaves, leaf area index, flower clusters number, dry mass, number of green pods, pod weight and N uptake characters, orderly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1238 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CM2 combined with seed biofertilizer inoculation gave the best growth and yield traits.

Taxon
snap beane0
Treatment
dual treatment of CM2 (100 kg N ha -1 ) and inoculate the seed with biofertilizere0
Outcome
growth and yield traitse0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the best significant vigorous of the growth and yield traits of snap bean plants, was achieved with the dual treatment of CM2 (100 kg N ha -1 ) and inoculate the seed with biofertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1435 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

156 papers: 131 positive, 25 negative or no effect

130 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

152 papers more in this group

See all 156 papers →

inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

195 papers: 153 positive, 42 negative or no effect

152 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

191 papers more in this group

See all 195 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.