Paper · 1977 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Influence of Shade and Fertilizer on Light Compensation Point of Ficus benjamina L.1

R. C. Collard; J. N. Joiner; C. A. Conover; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
26
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Light and fertilizer significantly affected light compensation point (LCP) in Ficus benjamina in a 3 × 4 factorial experiment with 0%, 30%, 55% and 80% light exclusion and of 784, 1568 and 2352 kg N+K/ha/year. Increasing shade levels decreased LCP and at each shade level increasing fertilizer rates increased LCP. Fertilizer was less effective than shade in altering LCP. The highest LCP at 0% shade and 784 kg N+K/ha/year was nearly 3 times higher than the lowest LCP at 80% shade and 784 kg N+K/ha/year. Increasing shade and fertilizer levels increased chlorophyll content, plant size and visible quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing shade decreased light compensation point.

Taxon
Ficus benjaminaFicus benjaminae1
Treatment
shadee0
Outcome
LCPe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus benjamina
Ficus benjamina · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing shade levels decreased LCP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–256 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ficus benjamina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing fertilizer increased light compensation point at each shade level.

Taxon
Ficus benjaminaFicus benjaminae1
Treatment
fertilizer ratese0
Outcome
LCPe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus benjamina
Ficus benjamina · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at each shade level increasing fertilizer rates increased LCP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–322 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ficus benjamina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer altered LCP less than shade.

Taxon
Ficus benjaminaFicus benjaminae1
Treatment
Fertilizere0
Outcome
LCPe0
Direction
less effectivee0
Comparator
shadee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus benjamina
Ficus benjamina · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizer was less effective than shade in altering LCP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–380 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ficus benjamina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–102 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest LCP was nearly three times the lowest LCP.

Taxon
Ficus benjaminaFicus benjaminae1
Outcome
LCPe0
Direction
highere0
Value
nearly 3 timese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus benjamina
Ficus benjamina · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest LCP at 0% shade and 784 kg N+K/ha/year was nearly 3 times higher than the lowest LCP at 80% shade and 784 kg N+K/ha/year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–514 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ficus benjamina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing shade increased chlorophyll content, plant size and visible quality.

Taxon
Ficus benjaminaFicus benjaminae1
Treatment
shadee0
Outcome
chlorophyll content, plant size and visible qualitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus benjamina
Ficus benjamina · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing shade and fertilizer levels increased chlorophyll content, plant size and visible quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–616 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ficus benjamina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing fertilizer increased chlorophyll content, plant size and visible quality.

Taxon
Ficus benjaminaFicus benjaminae1
Treatment
fertilizere0
Outcome
chlorophyll content, plant size and visible qualitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus benjamina
Ficus benjamina · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing shade and fertilizer levels increased chlorophyll content, plant size and visible quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–616 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ficus benjamina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–102 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Ficus benjamina (weeping fig)Results differ

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.